Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of sentinel lymph node size and shape as a predictor of occult metastasis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate sentinel lymph node size as a predictor of metastasis in N0 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma treated by individual sentinel node biopsy (SNB) guided neck dissection. In addition, to evaluate lymph node shape as an indicator of malignancy. A retrospective study based on data from 50 patients with clinically N0 neck and oral squamous cell carcinoma stage T1-2N0M0, SNB and consecutive neck dissection was performed. Excised sentinel nodes were measured in three axes by the surgeons before undergoing histopathological examination. Measured sentinel node axis lengths were compared with the histopathological results. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2008 for Mac, version 12.0. A total of 167 sentinel nodes was excised with a median of 3.3 per patient. Following SNB 18% of the patients was upstaged at the subsequent histopathological examination. This correlates to 7% of the total number of sentinel nodes. The diameters of all three axes were compared for both negative and positive nodes. The positive nodes were not significantly larger. The sensitivity and specificity of lymph node size as a criterion for staging were calculated at several thresholds. There was no tendency that lymph node shape changed towards spherical when positive for metastases. There is a tendency that the risk of metastases and upstaging increases with increasing maximum and partly minimum diameter. However, in this study it was not possible to establish a suitable threshold level with both high sensitivity and specificity based on size and shape. Other features of the lymph node must be considered if an accurate staging of N0 patients is to be performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bilde A, Von Buchwald C, Johansen J et al (2006) The Danish national guidelines for treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol 45:294–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. von Buchwald C, Bilde A, Shoaib T et al (2002) Sentinel node biopsy: the technique and the feasibility in head and neck cancer. ORL J otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 64:268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ross G (2004) Rationale for sentinel node biopsy to stage N0 head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 19:273–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khafif A, Schneebaum S, Fliss DM et al (2006) Lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node mapping using a hybrid single photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT system in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 28:874–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rigual N, Douglas W, Lamonica D et al (2005) Sentinel lymph node biopsy: a rational approach for staging T2N0 oral cancer. Laryngoscope 115:2217–2220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alkureishi LW, Ross GL, MacDonald DG et al (2007) Sentinel node in head and neck cancer: use of size criterion to upstage the no neck in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 29:95–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia Callejo FJ, Dualde Beltran D, Benlloch Ramos E et al (2008) Use of imaging criteria to identify cervical metastases using CT scans in head and neck tumours. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 59:257–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hohlweg-Majert B, Metzger MC, Voss PJ et al (2009) Preoperative cervical lymph node size evaluation in patients with malignant head/neck tumors: comparison between ultrasound and computer tomography. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 135:753–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Layland MK, Sessions DG, Lenox J (2005) The influence of lymph node metastasis in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx: N0 versus N+. Laryngoscope 115:629–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Som PM (1992) Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:961–969

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brazilian Head and Neck Cancer Study Group (1999) End results of a prospective trial on elective lateral neck dissection vs type III modified radical neck dissection in the management of supraglottic and transglottic carcinomas. Head Neck 21:694–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bilde A, von Buchwald C, Therkildsen MH et al (2008) Need for intensive histopathologic analysis to determine lymph node metastases when using sentinel node biopsy in oral cancer. Laryngoscope 118:408–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hermanek P, Hutter VR, Sobin HL et al (1999) International union against cancer. Classification of isolated tumor cells and micrometastasis. Cancer 86:2668–2673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Christensen A, Bilde A, Therkildsen MH et al (2011) The prevalence of occult metastases in nonsentinel lymph nodes after step-serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry in cN0 oral squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 121:294–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van den Brekel MW, Stel HV, Castelijns JA et al (1990) Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria. Radiology 177:379–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Som PM, Curtin HD, Mancuso AA (2000) The new imaging-based classification for describing the location of lymph nodes in the neck with particular regard to cervical lymph nodes in relation to cancer of the larynx. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 62:186–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schöder H, Yeung HW, Gonen M et al (2004) Head and neck cancer: clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion. Radiology 231:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shah GV, Fischbein NJ, Gandhi D et al (2004) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 15:71–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yonetsu K, Sumi M, Izumi M et al (2001) Contribution of Doppler sonography blood flow information to the diagnosis of metastatic cervical nodes in patients with head and neck cancer: assessment in relation to anatomic levels of the neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:163–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alkureishi LW, Burak Z, Alvarez JA et al (2009) Joint practice guidelines for radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node localization in oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3190–3210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Flach GB, Broglie MA, van Schie A et al (2012) Sentinel node biopsy for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the previously treated neck. Oral Oncol 48(1):85–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest. None of the authors have a financial interest in the research and it is done without any financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Linnea Langhans, Anders Bilde, Birgitte Charabi, Marianne Hamilton Therkildsen & Christian von Buchwald

Authors
  1. Linnea Langhans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anders Bilde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Birgitte Charabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marianne Hamilton Therkildsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christian von Buchwald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linnea Langhans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langhans, L., Bilde, A., Charabi, B. et al. Evaluation of sentinel lymph node size and shape as a predictor of occult metastasis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 249–254 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-1959-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-1959-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation