Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Functional endoscopic surgery of paranasal fungus ball: clinical outcome, patient benefit and health-related quality of life

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paranasal fungus ball can cause chronic rhinosinusitis. Removal via functional endoscopic sinus surgery is usually performed; however objective data on the overall benefit and patient satisfaction are very scarce. The study focuses on the clinical outcome and the quality of life following endoscopic surgery due to fungus ball sinusitis. Forty patients diagnosed with fungus ball sinusitis who underwent functional endoscopic surgery were included. Epidemiologic data, pre-, intra- and postoperative findings were recorded. Surgical success, the detailed benefit and the health-related quality of life were objectively assessed 1 year after the surgery based on a standardized questionnaire (modified SNOT 20) and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Health-related quality of life improved significantly in >90% of patients (p < 0.05). There were no serious complications or recurrences. As the treatment of choice functional endoscopic sinus surgery of paranasal fungus ball sinusitis is associated with exceptionally high patient satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferreiro JA, Carlson BA, Cody DT III (1997) Paranasal sinus fungus balls. Head Neck 19:481–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Simmen D, Briner HR, Schar G, Schuknecht B (1998) Chronic mycoses of the paranasal sinuses—value of endonasal paranasal sinus surgery. Laryngorhinootologie 77:444–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stammberger H, Jakse R, Beaufort F (1984) Aspergillosis of the paranasal sinuses x-ray diagnosis, histopathology, and clinical aspects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 93:251–256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grosjean P, Weber R (2007) Fungus balls of the paranasal sinuses: a review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:461–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dufour X, Kauffmann-Lacroix C, Ferrie JC, Goujon JM, Rodier MH et al (2006) Paranasal sinus fungus ball: epidemiology, clinical features and diagnosis. A retrospective analysis of 173 cases from a single medical center in France, 1989–2002. Med Mycol 44:61–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicolai P, Lombardi D, Tomenzoli D, Villaret AB, Piccioni M et al (2009) Fungus ball of the paranasal sinuses: experience in 160 patients treated with endoscopic surgery. Laryngoscope 119:2275–2279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Klossek JM, Serrano E, Peloquin L, Percodani J, Fontanel JP et al (1997) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery and 109 mycetomas of paranasal sinuses. Laryngoscope 107:112–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Broglie MA, Tinguely M, Holzman D (2009) How to diagnose sinus fungus balls in the paranasal sinus? An analysis of an institution’s cases from January 1999 to December 2006. Rhinology 47:379–384

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Weber RS (2007) Improving the quality of head and neck cancer care. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:1188–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pagella F, Matti E, De Bernardi F, Semino L, Cavanna C et al (2007) Paranasal sinus fungus ball: diagnosis and management. Mycoses 50:451–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lai JC, Lee HS, Chen MK, Tsai YL (2011) Patient satisfaction and treatment outcome of fungus ball rhinosinusitis treated by functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:227–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fokkens W, Lund V, Mullol J (2007) European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2007. Rhinol Suppl 1-136

  13. Piccirillo JF, Merrit MG Jr, Richards ML (2002) Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:41–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pynnonen MA, Kim HM, Terrell JE (2009) Validation of the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 20 (SNOT-20) domains in nonsurgical patients. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23:40–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gatehouse S (ed) (1998) The Glasgow health status questionnaires manual. MRC Institute of Hearing Research, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland

  16. Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105:415–422

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Braun T, Gratza S, Becker S, Schwentner I, Stelter K et al (2010) Auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene frameworks: outcome and patient benefit in 65 children and adults. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1201–1212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferguson BJ (2000) Fungus balls of the paranasal sinuses. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 33:389–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gliklich RE, Metson R (1997) Effect of sinus surgery on quality of life. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:12–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Konstantinidis I, Triaridis S, Triaridis A, Karagiannidis K, Kontzoglou G (2005) Long term results following nasal septal surgery. Focus on patients’ satisfaction. Auris Nasus Larynx 32:369–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Salama N, Oakley RJ, Skilbeck CJ, Choudhury N, Jacob A (2009) Benefit from the minimally invasive sinus technique. J Laryngol Otol 123:186–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Salhab M, Matai V, Salam MA (2004) The impact of functional endoscopic sinus surgery on health status. Rhinology 42:98–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Newton JR, Shakeel M, Ram B (2008) Evaluation of endoscopic sinus surgery by Glasgow benefit inventory. J Laryngol Otol 122:357–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany

    Georg J. Ledderose, Thomas Braun, Christian S. Betz, Klaus Stelter & Andreas Leunig

Authors
  1. Georg J. Ledderose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Braun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian S. Betz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Klaus Stelter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andreas Leunig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg J. Ledderose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ledderose, G.J., Braun, T., Betz, C.S. et al. Functional endoscopic surgery of paranasal fungus ball: clinical outcome, patient benefit and health-related quality of life. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269, 2203–2208 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-1925-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-1925-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation