Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cochlear implantation outcomes in children with Waardenburg syndrome

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Waardenburg syndrome (WS) is an autosomal dominant disease, characterized by dystopia canthorum, hyperplasia of the eyebrows, heterochromia iridis, white forelock, and congenital sensori-neural hearing loss (SNHL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of cochlear implantation in children with WS and compare it with children with pure SNHL. In a prospective study we evaluated 336 cochlear implanted children from 2008 to 2010. The WS was diagnosed by its established criteria and for control group children without any dysmorphic features, anatomical, behavioral, and developmental disorders were also enrolled. We evaluated children of both groups 1 year after cochlear implantation by categories of auditory performance (CAP) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) tests. Eighty-one children out of the total 336 who had SNHL were included in study. Out of these 75 (22.3%) were healthy and six (1.78%) had WS. Of the 75 healthy children 40 (53.3%) were girls, while of the six children with WS, three (50%) were girls. There was a significant difference in SIR between WS and cases with pure SNHL (2.67 ± 1.03 vs. 3.79 ± 1.11, p = 021) however, the difference was not significant in CAP (4 ± 1.26 vs. 5.13 ± 1.13, p = 0.082). Prevalence of WS was 1.78% at Baqiyatallah Cochlear Implant Center. One year after implantation there was no significant difference in auditory outcome; however, the difference in speech outcome was significant between WS and cases with pure SNHL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang NM et al (2007) Pediatric cochlear implantation in Taiwan: long-term communication outcomes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 71(11):1775–1782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Waltzman SB et al (2002) Long-term effects of cochlear implants in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(5):505–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Archbold SM et al (2000) Approach to communication, speech perception and intelligibility after paediatric cochlear implantation. Br J Audiol 34(4):257–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Geers AE (2004) Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(5):634–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McConkey Robbins A, Green JE, Waltzman SB (2004) Bilingual oral language proficiency in children with cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(5):644–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Donoghue GM, Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM (2000) Determinants of speech perception in children after cochlear implantation. Lancet 356(9228):466–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicholas JG, Geers AE (2006) Effects of early auditory experience on the spoken language of deaf children at 3 years of age. Ear Hear 27(3):286–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Geers A, Brenner C, Davidson L (2003) Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear 24(1 Suppl):24S–35S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bauer PW et al (2002) Cochlear implantation in children with CHARGE association. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(9):1013–1017

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Read AP, Newton VE (1997) Waardenburg syndrome. J Med Genet 34(8):656–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Konno P, Silm H (2001) Waardenburg syndrome. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 15(4):330–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Calmels MN et al (2004) Speech perception and speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 68(3):347–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vivero RJ et al (2010) Cochlear implantation in common forms of genetic deafness. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74(10):1107–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nikolopoulos TP et al (2008) Speech production in deaf implanted children with additional disabilities and comparison with age-equivalent implanted children without such disorders. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72(12):1823–1828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pau H et al (2006) Cochlear implantations in children with Waardenburg syndrome: an electrophysiological and psychophysical review. Cochlear Implants Int 7(4):202–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cullen RD et al (2006) Cochlear implants in Waardenburg syndrome. Laryngoscope 116(7):1273–1275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaufmann L, Sauter TB, Lee DJ (2010) Dysplasia of the cerebellum in Waardenburg syndrome: outcomes following cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74(1):93–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Loundon N et al (2005) Cochlear implantation in children with internal ear malformations. Otol Neurotol 26(4):668–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rajput K, Brown T, Bamiou DE (2003) Aetiology of hearing loss and other related factors versus language outcome after cochlear implantation in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67(5):497–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang HM et al (2004) The auditory performance in children using cochlear implants: effects of mental function. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 68(9):1185–1188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kontorinis G et al (2011) Outcomes and special considerations of cochlear implantation in waardenburg syndrome. Otol Neurotol 32(6):951–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sugii A et al (2000) Cochlear implant in a young child with Waardenburg syndrome. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 57:215–219

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Moon SK et al (2004) Cochlear implantation in a case with Waardenburg syndrome. Cochlear Implants Int 5(Suppl 1):212–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Migirov L et al (2005) Cochlear implantation in Waardenburg’s syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol 125(7):713–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Daneshi A, Hassanzadeh S, Farhadi M (2005) Cochlear implantation in children with Waardenburg syndrome. J Laryngol Otol 119(9):719–723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Suarez H et al (2007) Balance sensory organization in children with profound hearing loss and cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 71(4):629–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Baldassari CM et al (2009) Receptive language outcomes in children after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140(1):114–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wan L et al (2010) Cochlear implantation in patients with Waardenburg syndrome type II. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 24(10):436–438

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Deka RC et al (2010) Cochlear implantation in Waardenburg syndrome: the Indian scenario. Acta Otolaryngol 130(10):1097–1100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank parents of children who kindly participated in this investigation. The authors would also like to express their gratitude to Dr. Mohsen Reza Haidari for reviewing and meticulous extensive editing of the English text.

Conflict of interest

None of authors have conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Saburi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amirsalari, S., Ajallouyean, M., Saburi, A. et al. Cochlear implantation outcomes in children with Waardenburg syndrome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269, 2179–2183 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1877-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1877-3

Keywords

Navigation