Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do GP referral guidelines really work? Audit of an electronic urgent referral system for suspected head and neck cancer

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We adapted the 2002 Scottish Referral Guidelines for suspected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) as a set of “alarm symptoms.” These were then incorporated into a new Suspected Cancer Urgent Referral Electronically (SeCURE) system enabling immediate electronic referral from primary care to the appropriate hospital-based multi-disciplinary cancer team. All referrals made via the SeCURE system during the first year of its implementation were reviewed retrospectively. One hundred and ninety patients were urgently referred, of whom 15 (8%) were ultimately diagnosed with SCCHN. This audit demonstrated overall poor compliance with the referral guidelines. Although the electronic referral system helped for speedy clinic appointments, there was a low pick up rate of positive head and neck cancer cases. Continuing education for GPs is important and following discussion with colleagues in primary care, steps have been taken to reinforce awareness and more appropriate use of the SeCURE system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baughan P, O’Neill B, Fletcher E (2009) Auditing the diagnosis of cancer in primary care: the experience in Scotland. Br J Cancer 101:S87–S91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Secretary of State for Health (1997) The New NHS, Modern, Dependable. Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scottish Executive Health Department (2001) Cancer in Scotland: action for change. Scottish Executive Health Department, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scottish Executive Health Department (2002) Scottish Referral Guidelines for suspected cancer. Scottish Executive Health Department, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shah HV, Williams RW, Irvine GH (2004) Fast-track referrals for oral lesions: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:207–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh P, Warnakulasuriya S (2006) The two-week wait cancer initiative on oral cancer; the predictive value of urgent referrals to an oral medicine unit. Br Dent J 201:717–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Duvvi SK, Thomas L, Vijayanand S, Reddy KT (2006) Two-week rule for suspected head and neck cancer. A study of compliance and effectiveness. J Eval Clin Pract 12:591–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lyons M, Philpott J, Hore I, Watters G (2004) Audit of referrals for head and neck cancer: the effect of the 2-week, fast track referral system. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 29:143–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams RW, Hughes W, Felmingham S, Irvine GH (2002) An audit of two week wait referrals for head and neck cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:304–306

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hobson JC, Malla JV, Sinha J, Kay NJ, Ramamurthy L (2008) Outcomes for patients referred urgently with suspected head and neck cancer. J Laryngol Otol 122:1241–1244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McKie C, Ahmad UA, Fellows S, Meikle D, Stafford FW, Thomson PJ et al (2008) The 2-week rule for suspected head and neck cancer in the United Kingdom: referral patterns, diagnostic efficacy of the guidelines and compliance. Oral Oncol 44:851–856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. The Information Centre (2006) DAHNO first annual report: key findings from the National Head and Neck Cancer Audit. Leeds 35

  13. The Information Centre. (2007) National Head and Neck Cancer Audit: DAHNO second annual report. Leeds 43–44

  14. Cant PJ, Yu DS (2000) Impact of the “2 week wait” directive for suspected cancer on service provision in a symptomatic breast clinic. Br J Surg 87:1082–1086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Khawaja AR, Allan SM (2000) Has the breast cancer “two week wait” guarantee for assessment made any difference? Eur J Surg Oncol 26:536–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Some of this work was presented as a poster at the British Association of Head and Neck Oncologists Scientific Meeting, Royal College of Physicians, London; 24 April 2009.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann-Maree Kennedy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, AM., Aziz, A., Khalid, S. et al. Do GP referral guidelines really work? Audit of an electronic urgent referral system for suspected head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269, 1509–1512 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1788-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1788-3

Keywords

Navigation