Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic sensitivity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detecting synchronous multiple primary cancers in head and neck cancer patients

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We assessed the sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET) for detecting synchronous multiple primary cancers, particularly synchronous esophageal cancers in head and neck cancer patients. We retrospectively reviewed 230 head and neck cancer patients. All the patients routinely underwent the following examinations: urinalysis, occult blood, tumor marker detection [squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), cytokeratin fragment (CYFRA), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)], esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy (when CEA was high or occult blood was positive), abdominal ultrasonography, plain chest computed tomography (CT), and PET. Bronchoscopy was performed when CT revealed lung shadow of central region. Synchronous multiple primary cancers were detected in 42 (18.2%) patients. The diagnostic sensitivity of PET for synchronous primary cancers was as follows: esophagus, 7.6% (1/13); stomach, 25.0% (2/8); lung, 66.7% (4/6); head and neck, 75.0% (3/4); colon, 0% (0/1); kidney, 0% (0/1); and subcutaneous, 100% (1/1). The sensitivity of PET for detecting synchronous esophageal cancers is low because these are early-stage cancers (almost stage 0–I). Therefore, it is necessary to perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy for detecting synchronous esophageal cancers. PET is an important additional tool for detecting synchronous multiple primary cancers because the diagnostic sensitivity of PET in synchronous head and neck cancer and lung cancer is high. But PET has the limitation of sensitivity for synchronous multiple primary cancers because the diagnostic sensitivity of PET in synchronous esophageal cancer is very low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shons AR, McQuarrie DG (1985) Multiple primary epidermoid carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Arch Surg 120:1007–1009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamamoto E, Shibuya H, Yoshimura R, Miura M (2002) Site specific dependency of second primary cancer in early stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 94:2007–2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones AS, Morar P, Phillips DE, Field JK, Husband D, Helliwell TR (1995) Second primary tumors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 75:1343–1353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schoder H, Yeung HW, Gonen M, Kraus D, Larson SM (2004) Head and neck cancer: clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion. Radiology 231:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Andrade RS, Heron DE, Degirmenci B et al (2006) Posttreatment assessment of response using FDG-PET/CT for patients treated with definitive radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:1315–1322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Warren S, Gates O (1932) Multiple malignant tumors: a survey of literature and statistical study. Am J Cancer 51:1358–1414

    Google Scholar 

  7. Billroth T (1882) Die allgemeine chirurgische pathologie und therapie. Ihr 51 vorlesungen: ein handbuch fur studierende und aerzte. Berlin G Riemer, pp 980

  8. McGarry GW, Mackenzie K, Periasamy P, McGurk F, Gatehouse S (1992) Multiple primary malignant tumours in patients with head and neck cancer: the implications for follow-up. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 17:558–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stokkel MP, Moons KG, ten Broek FW, van Rijk PP, Hordijk GJ (1999) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose dual-head positron emission tomography as a procedure for detecting simultaneous primary tumors in cases of head and neck cancer. Cancer 86:2370–2377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bold B, Piao Y, Murata Y, Kishino M, Shibuya H (2008) Usefulness of PET/CT for detecting a second primary cancer after treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Nucl Med 33:831–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Panosetti E, Luboinski B, Mamelle G, Richard JM (1989) Multiple synchronous and metachronous cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract: a nine-year study. Laryngoscope 99:1267–1273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haughey BH, Gates GA, Arfken CL, Harvey J (1992) Meta-analysis of second malignant tumors in head and neck cancer: the case for an endoscopic screening protocol. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 101:105–112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dhooge IJ, de Vos M, van Cauwenberge PB (1998) Multiple primary malignant tumors in patients with head and neck cancer: results of a prospective study and future perspectives. Laryngoscope 108:250–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jovanovic A, van der Tol IG, Kostense PJ et al (1994) Second respiratory and upper digestive tract cancer following oral squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 30B:225–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hurt HH, Borders AC (1932–1933) Multiple primary malignant neoplasms. J Lab Clin Med 18:765–777

    Google Scholar 

  16. Slaughter DP, Southwick HW, Smejkal W (1953) Field cancerization in oral stratified squamous epithelium; clinical implications of multicentric origin. Cancer 6:963–968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohn AM, Peppard SB (1980) Multiple primary malignant tumors of the head and neck. Am J Otolaryngol 1:411–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoon YC, Lee KS, Shim YM, Kim BT, Kim K, Kim TS (2003) Metastasis to regional lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: CT versus FDG PET for presurgical detection prospective study. Radiology 227:764–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Westreenen HL, Heeren PA, Jager PL, van Dullemen HM, Groen H, Plukker JT (2003) Pitfalls of positive findings in staging esophageal cancer with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Ann Surg Oncol 10:1100–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Himeno S, Yasuda S, Shimada H, Tajima T, Makuuchi H (2002) Evaluation of esophageal cancer by positron emission tomography. Jpn J Clin Oncol 32:340–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norio Kondo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kondo, N., Tsukuda, M. & Nishimura, G. Diagnostic sensitivity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detecting synchronous multiple primary cancers in head and neck cancer patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269, 1503–1507 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1784-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1784-7

Keywords

Navigation