Skip to main content
Log in

Piezosurgery® versus microdrill in intact canal wall mastoidectomy

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Piezosurgery® is a recently developed system for cutting bone with microvibrations. The objectives of the present study were to report our experience with the piezoelectric device in the intact canal mastoidectomy, and to compare the results with traditional method by means of microdrill. A non-randomized controlled trial was undertaken on 60 intact canal wall mastoidectomy performed using the piezoelectric device (30 patients) or the microdrill (30 patients). Before 1 month and 1 year after surgery, all the patients underwent the following instrumental examinations: otomicroscopic evaluation of the tympanic membrane and external auditory duct, bone conduction threshold audiometry, tympanometry, transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions with linear click emission, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, auditory brainstem response (ABR) by MK 12-ABR screener with natus-ALGO2e (Amplifon, Milan, Italy), and electronystamographic recording. The piezoelectric device is proved to be effective in sclerotic and pneumatic mastoid, with an excellent control and without side effects on the adjacent structures of the middle and inner ear (lateral sinus, facial nerve, and/or dura mater). The operation time has been the same as compared with microdrill, and the average hospital stay was significantly (p < 0.05) shorter. Postoperatively, all patients had uneventful recovery with no evidence of audiovestibular deficit or side effects. Our experience highlights the safety of the piezoelectric device on the anatomic structures of the middle and inner ear, and demonstrates its efficiency in terms of cutting precision and healing process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett M, Warren F, Haynes D (2006) Indications and technique in mastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 39:1095–1113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Salami A, Dellepiane M, Salzano FA, Mora R (2007) Piezosurgery® in the excision of middle ear tumours: effects on mineralized and non-mineralized tissues. Med Sci Monit 13:PI 25–PI 29

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vercellotti T, Dellepiane M, Mora R, Salami A (2007) Piezoelectric bone surgery in otosclerosis. Acta Otolaryngol 127:932–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Salami A, Verecellotti T, Mora R, Dellepiane M (2007) Piezoelectric bone surgery in otologic surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:484–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Salami A, Dellepiane M, Mora R (2008) A novel approach to the facial nerve decompression: use of Piezosurgery®. Acta Otolaryngol 128:530–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salami A, Mora R, Dellepiane M (2008) Piezosurgery in the exeresis of glomus tympanicum tumours. Eur Arch Otorhinolaringol 265:1035–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salami A, Dellepiane M, Proto E, Mora R (2009) Piezosurgery in otologic surgery: four years of experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:412–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cho Y-S, Hong DS, Chung KW, Hong SH, Chung W-H, Shin HP (2010) Revision surgery for chronic otitis media: characteristics and outcomes in comparison with primary surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 37:18–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanemaru S, Nakamura T, Omori K (2004) Regeneration of mastoid air cells: clinical applications. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 551:80–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapple IL, Walmsley AD, Saxby MS, Moscrop H (1995) Effect of instrument power setting during ultrasonic scaling upon treatment outcome. J Periodontol 66:756–760

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lazo-Sáenz JG, Galván-Aguilera AA, Martínez-Ordaz VA, Velasco-Rodriguez VM, Nieves-Renteria A, Rincon-Castaneda C (2005) Eustachian tube dysfunction in allergic rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:626–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Salami A, Dellepiane M, Crippa B, Ralli G, Mora R (2009) The effects of Piezosurgery® on the cochlear outer hair cells. Acta Laryngol 129:497–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lenhardt ML (2003) Ultrasonic hearing in humans: applications for tinnitus treatment. Int Tinnitus J 9:69–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have a financial relationship with any organization that sponsored the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renzo Mora.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salami, A., Mora, R., Dellepiane, M. et al. Piezosurgery® versus microdrill in intact canal wall mastoidectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267, 1705–1711 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1308-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1308-x

Keywords

Navigation