Skip to main content
Log in

Supracricoid laryngectomy: oncologic validity and functional safety

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to elucidate the oncologic validity of the supracricoid laryngectomy (SCL) for locally advanced endolaryngeal cancers and as a salvage procedure, and to determine its safety in maintaining laryngeal physiology. The medical records of 114 patients that underwent SCL were reviewed. We examined whether the extended procedures, salvage procedure, adjuvant treatment, and type of reconstruction were associated with patient survival and the mean time of decannulation and nasogastric tube removal. Postoperative complications were investigated. There was no significant difference in survival according to the extent of the resection of the primary tumors and the presence or absence of previous treatment. However, the survival of patients that received radiation or concurrent chemoradiation after SCL was significantly lower than that of patients without any adjuvant treatment. Decannulation and nasogastric tube removal was possible for all except for two patients, and the mean time required was 18.4 and 26.1 days, respectively. The interval to starting oral feeding was significantly increased in cases that underwent cricohyoidopexy, an extended procedure, and salvage surgery compared to their counterparts. Pulmonary complications, particularly aspiration pneumonia, were the most common postoperative complications. The results of this study suggest that SCL was feasible for locally advanced laryngeal cancers and as a salvage procedure. Active and effective postoperative swallowing rehabilitation, particularly in cases that underwent cricohyoidopexy, an extended procedure, and salvage surgery, is needed to prevent aspiration pneumonia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laccourreye H, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Menard M, Brasnu D (1990) Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy: a partial laryngeal procedure for glottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 99(6 pt 1):421–426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Laccourreye H, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Menard M, Brasnu D (1990) Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy: a partial laryngeal procedure for selected supraglottic and transglottic carcinomas. Laryngoscope 100(7):735–741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deganello A, Gallo O, De Cesare JM et al (2008) Supracricoid partial laryngectomy as salvage surgery for radiation therapy failure. Head Neck 30(8):1064–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Soudry E, Marmor Y, Hazan A, Marx S, Sadov R, Feinmesser R (2008) Supracricoid partial laryngectomy: an alternative to total laryngectomy for locally advanced laryngeal cancers. J Laryng Otol 122(11):1219–1223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rizzotto G, Succo G, Lucioni M, Pazzaia T (2006) Subtotal laryngectomy with tracheohyoidopexy: a possible alternative to total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 116(10):1907–1917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rifai M (2007) Extended supracricoid laryngectomy with excision of both arytenoids: the modified reconstructive laryngectomy. Acta Otolaryngol 127(6):642–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holsinger FC, Weinstein GS, Laccourreye O (2005) Supracricoid partial laryngectomy: an organ-preservation surgery for laryngeal malignancy. Curr Probl Cancer 29(4):190–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewin JS, Hutcheson KA, Barringer DA et al (2008) Functional analysis of swallowing outcomes after supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Head Neck 30(5):559–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lima RA, Freitas EQ, Dias FL et al (2006) Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy for advanced glottic cancer. Head Neck 28(6):481–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakayama M, Okamoto M, Miyamoto S et al (2008) Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglotto-pexy or cricohyoido-pexy: experience on 32 patients. Auris Nasus Larynx 35(1):77–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sparano A, Chernock R, Feldman M, Laccourreye O, Brasnu D, Weinstein G (2005) Extending the inferior limits of supracricoid partial laryngectomy: a clinicopathological correlation. Laryngoscope 115(2):297–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganly I, Patel SG, Matsuo J et al (2006) Results of surgical salvage after failure of definitive radiation therapy for early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(1):59–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suoglu Y, Guven M, Kiyak E, Enoz M (2008) Significance of pre-epiglottic space invasion in supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy. J Laryngol Otol 122(6):623–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hinerman RW, Morris CG, Amdur RJ et al (2006) Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and pharynx. Am J Clin Oncol 29(6):613–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marioni G, Marchese-Ragona R, Ottaviano G, Staffieri A (2004) Supracricoid laryngectomy: is it time to define guidelines to evaluate functional results? a review. Am J Otolaryngol 25(2):98–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gallo O, Deganello A, Gitti G et al (2009) Prognostic role of pneumonia in supracricoid and supraglottic laryngectomies. Oral Oncol 45(1):30–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Woisard V, Puech M, Yardeni E, Serrano E, Pessey JJ (1996) Deglutition after supracricoid laryngectomy: compensatory mechanisms and sequelae. Dysphagia 11(4):265–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Naudo P, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Jouffre V, Laccourreye H, Brasnu D (1998) Complications and functional outcome after supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118(1):124–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Laccourreye O, Ross J, Brasnu D, Chabardes E, Kelly JH, Laccourreye H (1994) Extended supracricoid partial laryngectomy with tracheocricohyoidoepiglottopexy. Acta Otolaryngol 114(6):669–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ganly I, Patel SG, Matsuo J et al (2009) Analysis of postoperative complications of open partial laryngectomy. Head Neck 31(3):338–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Logemann JA (1997) Role of the modified barium swallow in management of patients with dysphagia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116(3):335–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Sik Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, K.J., Joo, Y.H., Sun, D.I. et al. Supracricoid laryngectomy: oncologic validity and functional safety. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267, 1919–1925 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1279-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1279-y

Keywords

Navigation