Abstract
Although pectoralis major flap (PM flap) has been used as the workhorse flap in head and neck reconstruction, its use in head and neck defects seems to fall out of favour in the era of free tissue transfer. The aim of this review is to find out the role of PM flap in modern head and neck surgery. Medical records of patients who underwent PM flap reconstruction for head and neck defect in our division were reviewed. The age, gender, flap type, indication and complication rate were described. Between January 1998 and December 2008, 202 PM flaps were used for head and neck reconstruction in 192 patients. In the early study period (1998–June 2003), out of the 119 PM flap reconstructions, 106 (89%) were performed for immediate reconstruction after resection of head and neck tumour, while 10 (8%) were performed as salvage procedures for complication after tumour resection e.g. failure of free flap, pharyngocutaneous fistula. In the late study period (July 2003–2008), out of the 83 PM flap reconstructions, 58 (70%) were performed for immediate reconstruction, while 24 (29%) were performed as salvage procedures. For immediate reconstruction after tumour extirpation, 51 flaps (48%) were performed for reconstruction of the tongue in the early study period, while only 14 (24%) were performed in the late study period. The number of PM flap used for immediate reconstruction for other head and neck defects remained relatively static throughout the two study periods. Over the study period, there were 10 (5%) cases of partial flap necrosis and 2 (1%) total flap loss, making the overall flap necrosis rate 6%. In the era of free tissue transfer, the role of PM flap in head and neck surgery has shifted from immediate reconstruction to salvage operation. However, PM flap still has an unique role in the repair of certain head and neck defects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ariyan S (1979) The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap: a versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:73–81
Kroll SS, Goepfert H, Jones M, Guillamondegui O, Schusterman M (1990) Analysis of complications in 168 pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps used for head and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 25:93–97
Zbar RI, Funk GF, McCulloch TM, Graham SM, Hoffman HT (1997) Pectoralis major myofascial flap: a valuable tool in contemporary head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 19:412–418
Mehta S, Sarkar S, Kavarana N, Bhathena H, Mehta A (1996) Complications of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in the oral cavity: a prospective evaluation of 220 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:31–37
Bertino G, Spasiano R, Mazzola I, Benazzo M (2005) The use of pedicled and free flaps in laryngeal cancer recurrences: postoperative considerations and functional results. Ann Plast Surg 55:384–388
de Bree R, Reith R, Quak JJ, Uyl-de Groot CA, van Agthoven M, Leemans CR (2007) Free radial forearm flap versus pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction of oral and oropharyngeal defects: a cost analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 32:275–282
Su WF, Hsia YJ, Chang YC, Chen SG, Sheng H (2003) Functional comparison after reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap or a pectoralis major flap for cancer of the tongue. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:412–418
Wong RK, Poon ES, Woo CY, Chan SC, Wong ES, Chu AW (2007) Speech outcomes in Cantonese patients after glossectomy. Head Neck 29:758–764
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, HL., Chan, J.YW. & Wei, W.I. The changing role of pectoralis major flap in head and neck reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267, 1759–1763 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1271-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1271-6