Skip to main content
Log in

Non-verbal visual reinforcement affects speech audiometry in the elderly

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate how non-verbal visual reinforcement provided by the audiologist during speech testing influences performance in the elderly. Thirty-two volunteers with age-related hearing loss with or without dual sensory-impairment (DSI), were administered a speech audiometry test in which they repeated lists of ten disyllabic words in two different conditions, namely with and without visual reinforcement. In the conditions of “with visual reinforcement”, the tester provided non-verbal cues to acknowledge the response of each participant. The “visual reinforcement” condition did not apparently provide any significant variation in the results. However, when we considered the group of patients without DSI, the non-verbal “visual reinforcement” resulted in better scores (p < 0.001). Non-verbal visual reinforcement may influence speech audiometry results in the elderly. During speech testing of elderly people with age-related hearing loss, audiologists should always remember to administer visual reinforcement to the patients in order to remove a possible confounding factor from audiological evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis AC (1989) The prevalence of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britain. Int J Epidemiol 18(4):911–917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gates GA, Cooper JC Jr, Kannel WB, Miller NJ (1990) Hearing in the elderly: the Framingham cohort, 1983–1985. Part I. Basic audiometric test results. Ear Hear 11(4):247–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martini A, Mazzoli M, Rosignoli M, Trevisi P, Maggi S, Enzi G, Crepaldi G (2001) Hearing in the elderly: a population study. Audiology 40(6):285–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Egan JP (1948) Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope 58(9):955–991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Salthouse TA (1996) The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev 103(3):403–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Craik F, Byrd M (1982) Aging and cognitive deficits: the role of attentional resources. In: Craik F, Trehub S (eds) Aging and cognitive processes. Plenum Press, New York, pp 191–211

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kausler DM (1994) Learning and memory in normal aging. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tun PA, McCoy S, Wingfield A (2009) Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. Psychol Aging 24(3):761–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Saunders GH, Echt KV (2007) An overview of dual sensory impairment in older adults: perspectives for rehabilitation. Trends Amplif 11(4):243–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Crews JE, Campbell VA (2004) Vision impairment and hearing loss among community-dwelling older Americans: implications for health and functioning. Am J Public Health 94(5):823–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Golding M, Mitchell P, Cupples L (2005) Risk markers for the graded severity of auditory processing abnormality in an older Australian population: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study. JAAA 16(6):348–356

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon MS, Allen S (2009) Audiovisual speech in older and younger adults: integrating a distorted visual signal with speech in noise. Exp Aging Res 35(2):202–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brennan M, Bally SJ (2007) Psychosocial adaptations to dual sensory loss in middle and late adulthood. Trends Amplif 11(4):281–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bocca E, Pellegrini A (1950) Statistical study of the phonetic composition of the Italian language and its practical application to audiometry of words. Archivio italiano di otologia, rinologia e laringologia 61(Suppl. 5):116–141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Neville HJ, Lawson DS (1987) Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement decision task: III. Separate effects of auditory deprivation and acquisition of a visual language. Brain Res 405:284–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Munro KJ, Lutman ME (2005) The influence of visual feedback on closed-set word test performance over time. Int J Audiol 44(12):701–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davenport SLH (2007) Minnesota deafblind technical assistance project: the five senses and communication. In: Project MDTA (ed) Minneapolis

  18. Pearman A, Friedman L, Brooks JO, Yesavage JA (2000) Hearing impairment and serial word recall in older adults. Exp Aging Res 26(4):383–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica Di Berardino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Berardino, F., Forti, S., Mattei, V. et al. Non-verbal visual reinforcement affects speech audiometry in the elderly. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267, 1367–1370 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1254-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1254-7

Keywords

Navigation