Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of titanium mesh in laryngotracheal reconstruction: an experimental study on rabbits

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Titanium mesh may be an alternative material to be used in laryngotracheal reconstruction. Twenty New Zealand rabbits were divided into two groups. Group A underwent laryngotracheoplasty with titanium mesh-buccal mucosa-muscle complex, and Group B received auricular cartilage grafts. All animals survived without complications. The animals were killed at 60 days, and laryngotracheal regions were evaluated. There was no subglottic collapse at physiologic and supraphysiologic negative airway pressures in Group A and mild-moderate collapse in Group B. Macroscopically the average antero-posterior and lateral diameters were not statistically different among two groups. Light microscopic examination revealed no fibrosis, necrosis or new cartilage formation in both groups. Inflammation and granulation were more pronounced in Group A. The lumens in both groups were moderately obstructed. Reconstruction of the upper airway with titanium mesh may be used in very selected cases where autologous grafting materials are inadequate and unsatisfactory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henderson JH, Welter JF, Mansour JM, Niyibizi C, Caplan AI, Dennis JE (2007) Cartilage tissue engineering for laryngotracheal reconstruction: comparison of chondrocytes from three anatomic locations in the rabbit. Tissue Eng 13(4):843–853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hartley EJ, Cotton RT (2000) Paediatric airway stenosis: laryngotracheal reconstruction or cricotracheal resection? Clin Otolaryngol 25:342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Laurian N, Zohar Y (1981) Laryngeal reconstruction by composite nasal mucoseptal graft after partial laryngectomy. Three years follow up. Laryngoscope 91:609–615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caputo V, Consiglio V (1961) The use of patients own auricular cartilage to repair deficiency of the tracheal wall. J Thorac Surg 41:589–594

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tucker HM, Wood BG, Levine H et al (1979) Glottic reconstruction after near total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 89:609–618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biller HF, Lawson W (1989) Partial laryngectomy for vocal cord cander with marked limitation of fixation of the vocal cord. Laryngoscope 96:61–64

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zalzal GH, Cotton RT, Mc Adams AJ (1986) The survival of costal cartilage grafts in the laryngotracheal reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 94:204–211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Freidman M, Torium DM, Owens R, Grybauskas VT (1998) Experience with the sternocleidomastoid myoperiosteal flap for reconstruction of subglottic and tracheal defects: modification of technique and report of long-term results. Laryngoscope 98:1003–1011

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alonso WA, Druck NS, Ogura JH (1976) Clinical experiences in hyoid arch transposition. Laryngoscope 86:617–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koltai PJ, Ellis B, Chan J, Calabro A (2006) Anterior and posterior cartilage graft dimensions in successful laryngotracheal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:631–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Triglia JM, Scheiner C, Gouvernet J, Cannoni M (1993) Hydroxyapatite in experimental laryngotracheal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119:87–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hashem FK, Homsi MA, Mahasin ZZ, Gammas MA (2001) Laryngotracheoplasty using Medpor implant: an animal model. J Otolaryngol 30:334–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein AM, Graham VL, Gulleth Y, Lafreniere D (2005) Polyglycolic acid/poly-l-lactic acid copolymer use in laryngotracheal reconstruction: a rabbit model. Laryngoscope 115:583–587

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Casiano RA, Patete M, Lindquist T (1994) Tracheoplasty using titanium reconstructive plates with strap-muscle flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 111:205–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zur KB, Urken ML (2003) Vascularized hemitracheal autograft for laryngotracheal reconstruction: a new surgical technique based on the thyroid gland as a vascular carrier. Laryngoscope. 113(9):1494–1498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cansiz H, Yener M, Dereköylü L (2002) Tracheal reconstruction with free composite cartilage graft: a case report. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 9(4):291–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cansiz H, Yener HM, Sekercioglu N, Günes M (2004) Laryngotracheal reconstruction with a muscle-pedicle hyoid bone flap: a series of 23 patients. Ear Nose Throat J 83(6):424–427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Naficy S, Esclamado RM, Clevens RA (1996) Reconstruction of the rabbit trachea with vascularized auricular perichondrium. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105(5):356–362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitskavich MT, Rimell FL, Shapiro AM, Post JC, Kapadia SB (1996) Laryngotracheal reconstruction using microplates in a porcine model with subglottic stenosis. Laryngoscope 106:301–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stein JM, Eliashar R, Eliachar I, Strome M (2000) Effect of mechanical reinforcement on stability of the rotary door flap laryngotracheal reconstruction: a canine study. Laryngoscope 110(12):2135–2142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Janssen LM, van Osch GJ, Li JP, Kops N, de Groot K, Von den Hoff JW, Feenstra L, Hardillo JA (2009) Tracheal reconstruction: mucosal survival on porous titanium. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135(5):472–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Disegi JA, Wyss H (1989) Implant materials for fracture fixation: a clinical perspective. Orthopedics 12(1):75–79

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Steinemann SG (1996) Metal implants and surface reactions. Injury 27(Suppl 3):SC16–SC22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Silver FM, Myer CM, Cotton RT (1993) Lateral division of the rabbit cricoid cartilage: its effect on cartilage growth. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 108(1):63–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gaafar AA, El-Daly AA, Gaafar HA (2008) Laryngotracheal augmentation using titanium mesh. J Laryngol Otol 122(4):391–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors of this paper declare that they have no conflict of interest. There is no financial and material support for this research. There are no financial interests the authors may have in companies or other entities that have an interest in the information in the contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Yener.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yener, M., Acar, G.O., Cansiz, H. et al. Use of titanium mesh in laryngotracheal reconstruction: an experimental study on rabbits. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267, 1247–1253 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1189-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1189-z

Keywords

Navigation