Skip to main content
Log in

Subjective visual vertical during eccentric rotation in patients with vestibular neuritis

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The subjective visual vertical (SVV) is a useful tool to evaluate clinical manifestations of vestibular loss, but there have been normal variations of the SVV within 1°–3°, and over time, the absolute deviated degrees of SVV tilts decreases. We investigated SVV values in patients with vestibular neuritis (VN) during eccentric rotation, the method used to assess utricular function during stimulation of one labyrinth. And we performed SVV in the resting state and during eccentric rotation to the lesion side and the healthy side of 15 patients with VN and 20 normal subjects. No difference in the resting state SVV values was observed between the VN patients and the control group, but there were significant differences in SVV values between these two groups during eccentric rotation. Therefore, SVV during eccentric rotation allowed us to obtain information about unilateral vestibular loss that could not be found by conventional SVV in patients with VN. Thus, SVV during eccentric rotation might be a good tool to diagnose unilateral vestibular loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baloh RW (2003) Vestibular neuritis. N Engl J Med 348:1027–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brandt T, Dieterich M (1987) Pathological eye–head coordination in roll: tonic ocular tilt reaction in mesencephalic and medullary lesions. Brain 110:649–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tabak S, Collewijn H, Boumans LJ (1997) Deviation of the subjective vertical in long-standing unilateral vestibular loss. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 117:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Min KK, Ha JS, Kim MJ, Cho CH, Cha HE, Lee JH (2007) Use of subjective visual horizontal and vertical in patients of unilateral vestibular neuritis. Otol Neurotol 28:520–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim HA, Hong JH, Lee H, Yi HA, Lee SR, Lee SY, Jang BC, Ahn BH, Baloh RW (2008) Otolith dysfunction in vestibular neuritis: recovery pattern and a predictor of symptom recovery. Neurology 70:449–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke AH, Schönfeld U, Helling K (2003) Unilateral examination of utricle and saccule function. J Vestib Res 13:215–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong SM, Park MS, Cha CI, Park CH, Lee JH (2008) Subjective visual vertical during eccentric rotation in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otol Neurotol 29:1167–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hong SM, Yeo SG, Kim SW, Cha CI (2008) The results of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, with consideration of age-related changes, in vestibular neuritis, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, and Meniere’s disease. Acta Otolaryngol 128:861–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedmann G (1970) The judgement of the visual vertical and horizontal with peripheral and central vestibular lesion. Brain 93:313–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bohmer A, Rickenmann J (1995) The subjective visual vertical as a clinical parameter of vestibular function in peripheral vestibular disease. J Vestib Res 5:35–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tribukait A, Bergenius J, Brantberg K (1996) The subjective visual horizontal for different body tilts in the roll plane; characterization of normal subject. Brain Res Bull 40:375–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chae SY, Noh HI, Suh BD (2004) Normal variation of subjective visual vertical and horizontal in human. Korean J Otolaryngol 43:260–264

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bergenius J, Tribukait A, Brantberg K (1996) The subjective horizontal at different angles of roll-tilt in patients with unilateral vestibular impairment. Brain Res Bull 40:385–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gomez Garcia A, Jauregui-Renaud K (2003) Subjective assessment of visual verticality in follow-up of patients with acute vestibular disease. Ear Nose Throat J 82:442–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith PF, Darlington CL (1991) Neurochemical mechanisms of recovery from peripheral vestibular lesions (vestibular compensation). Brain Res Rev 16:117–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vidal PP, De Waele C, Vibert N, Muhlethaler M (1998) Vestibular compensation revisited. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119:34–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Darlington CL, Smith PF (2000) Molecular mechanisms of recovery from vestibular damage in mammals: recent advances. Prog Neurobiol 62:313–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by a grant (Code # 200810FTH010103002) from BioGreen21 Program, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seok Min Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, S.M., Yeo, S.G., Byun, J.Y. et al. Subjective visual vertical during eccentric rotation in patients with vestibular neuritis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267, 357–361 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1064-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1064-y

Keywords

Navigation