European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 266, Issue 7, pp 1025–1030 | Cite as

Evaluation of taste after underlay technique myringoplasty using whole-mouth gustatory test: smokers versus non-smokers

  • Selmin Karatayli-Ozgursoy
  • Ozan B. Ozgursoy
  • Engin Muz
  • Gokcen Kesici
  • Metin N. Akiner
Miscellaneous

Abstract

The aim of this prospective non-randomized study was to evaluate the alterations in taste sensation after myringoplasty and to investigate the influence of smoking on taste. Ninety-six patients who underwent myringoplasty and 43 healthy controls were examined. Whole-mouth gustatory test solutions were sucrose (sweet); sodium chloride (salty taste); citrate (sour) taste; and quinine hydrochloride (bitter). Sucrose, citric acid, and sodium chloride recognition thresholds were high in the early postoperative period; however, they were regressed to the preoperative status in course of time. No difference was found between preoperative, early/late postoperative taste recognition thresholds of smoker and non-smoker patients. Underlay myringoplasty has little but transient effect on taste recognition in the early postoperative period. This impairment is completely recovered within 6 months. Furthermore, smoking has no effect on the taste recognition of patients with permanent tympanic membrane perforation and has no influence on the alterations in taste recognition thresholds after myringoplasty. We believe that this study will supply some additional aspects in the scope of taste disturbances due to ear surgery and smoking.

Keywords

Myringoplasty Tympanoplasty Chorda tympani Whole-mouth gustatory taste Smoking 

References

  1. 1.
    Clark MP, O’Malley S (2007) Chorda tympani nerve function after middle ear surgery. Otol Neurotol 28:335–340. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000247820.16325.f0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gedikli O, Doğru H, Aydin G (2001) Histopathological changes of chorda tympani in chronic otitis media. Laryngoscope 111:724–727. doi:10.1097/00005537-200104000-00029 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gopalan P, Kumar M, Gupta D et al (2005) A study of chorda tympani nerve injury and related symptoms following middle-ear surgery. J Laryngol Otol 119:189–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hadley K, Orlandi RR, Fong KJ (2004) Basic anatomy and physiology of olfaction and taste. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 37:1115–1126. doi:10.1016/j.otc.2004.06.009 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jeppsson PH (1969) Studies on the structure and innervation of taste buds. An experimental and clinical investigation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 259:1–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kveton JF, Bartoshuk LM (1994) The effect of unilateral chorda tympani damage on taste. Laryngoscope 104:25–29. doi:10.1288/00005537-199401000-00006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Landis BN, Beutner D, Frasnelli J, Hüttenbrink KB, Hummel T (2005) Gustatory function in chronic inflammatory middle ear diseases. Laryngoscope 115:1124–1127. doi:10.1097/01.MLG.0000163750.72441.C3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lloyd S, Meerton L, Di Cuffa R (2007) Taste change following cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 8:203–210. doi:10.1002/cii.342 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magielski JE, Blatt IM (1958) Submaxillary salivary flow: a test of chorda tympani nerve function as an aid in diagnosis and prognosis of facial nerve paralysis. Laryngoscope 68:1770–1789PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahendran S, Hogg R, Robinson JM (2005) To divide or manipulate the chorda tympani in stapedotomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 262:482–487. doi:10.1007/s00405-004-0854-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michael P, Raut V (2007) Chorda tympani injury: operative findings and postoperative symptoms. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:978–981. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2006.12.022 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sagakami M, Sone M, Tsuji K et al (2003) Rate of recovery of taste function after preservation of chorda tympani nerve in middle ear surgery with special reference to type of disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 112:52–56Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saito T, Manabe Y, Shibamori Y, Yamagishi T, Igawa H, Tokuriki M, Fukuoka Y, Noda I, Ohtsubo T, Saito H (2001) Long-term follow-up results of electrogustometry and subjective taste disorder after middle ear surgery. Laryngoscope 111:2064–2070. doi:10.1097/00005537-200111000-00037 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schiffman SS (1997) Taste and smell losses in normal aging and disease. JAMA 278:1357–1362. doi:10.1001/jama.278.16.1357 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tomita H, Ikeda M (2002) Clnical use of electrogustometry: strengths and limitations. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 546:27–38. doi:10.1080/00016480260046391 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vennemann MM, Hummel T, Berger K (2008) The association between smoking and smell and taste impairment in the general population. J Neurol (epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yamauchi Y, Endo S, Sakai F et al (2002) A new whole-mouth gustatory test procedure I. Thresholds and principal components analysis in healthy men and women. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 546:39–48. doi:10.1080/00016480260046409 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yamauchi Y, Endo S, Yoshimura I (2002) A new whole-mouth gustatory test procedure II. Effects of aging, gender and smoking. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 546:49–59. doi:10.1080/00016480260046418 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Selmin Karatayli-Ozgursoy
    • 1
  • Ozan B. Ozgursoy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Engin Muz
    • 1
  • Gokcen Kesici
    • 1
  • Metin N. Akiner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryAnkara University Medical SchoolAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of OtolaryngologyMayo ClinicJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations