Our objective was to identify the factors that could influence the success rate of type 1 tympanoplasty in a tertiary care centre where both residents and senior surgeons perform this operation. Six hundred and seven patients who had been performed type 1 tympanoplasty as a primary otologic surgery between January 1997 and December 2004 were retrospectively chart reviewed. The patients had intact and mobile ossicular chain peroperatively. Patients with any other macroscopic otologic pathology like cholesteatoma, granulation in the middle ear and osteitis in mastoid cells were excluded from the study. Dry ear, intact and mobile tympanic membrane, improvement of the hearing by at least 10 dB and air-bone gap less than 25 dB were accepted as success criteria after 12 months of follow-up period. Chi-square test was used for statistical comparison of the different influencing factors. The male gender, younger age, smaller-sized perforations and experience of the surgeon were stated as good prognostic factors due to statistical evaluation. Afterwards the data of the study group was reanalysed in order to decide the cases for the residents. Finally, it was observed that seniors had better results in cases with perforations greater than 50%, dry ears and patients older than 16 years. In training and research clinics where both residents and senior surgeons perform type 1 tympanoplasty, the rate of success can be enhanced if patients with perforations greater than 50%, dry ears and patients older than 16 years are operated by the senior surgeons. The reason for this is that these groups have the overall worse results and should by argument be done by senior surgeons.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Fisch U, May J (eds) (1994) Tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy and stapes surgery. Thieme, New York
Sheahan P, O’Dwyer T, Blayney A (2002) Results of type 1 tympanoplasty and parental perceptions of outcome of surgery. J Laryngol Otol 116:430–434
Tos M, Lau T (1989) Stability of tympanoplasty in children. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 22:15–28
Adkins WY, White B (1984) Type 1 tympanoplasty : Influencing factors. Laryngoscope 94:916–918
Vartiainen E, Nuutinen J (1993) Success and pitfalls in myringoplasty: follow-up study of 404 cases. Am J Otol 14:301–305
Pignataro L, Berta LGD, Capaccio P, Zaghis A (2001) Myringoplasty in children: anatomical and functional results. J Laryngol Otol 115:369–373
Caylan R, Titiz A, Falcioni M, De Donato G, Russo A, Taibah AA (1998) Myringoplasty in children: Factors influencing surgical outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:709–713
Halik JH, Smyth GDL (1988) Long term results of tympanic membrane repair. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 98:162–169
Mak D, Mackendrick A, Bulsara M, Coates H, Lannigan F, Lehmann D, Leidwinger L, Weeks S (2004) Outcomes of myringoplasty in Australian Aboriginal children and factors associated with success: a prospective case series. Clin Otolaryngol 29:606–611
Podoshin L, Fradis M, Malatskey S, Ben-David J (1996) Type 1 tympanoplasty in children. Am J Otol 17:293–296
De S, Karkanevatos A, Srinivasan VR, Lesser THJ (2004) Myringoplasty using a subcutaneous soft tissue graft. Clin Otolaryngol 29:314–317
Jurovitzki I, Sade J (1988) Myringoplasty: long term follow up. A J Otol 9:52–55
Isaacson G (1994) Tympanoplasty in children. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 27:593–605
Kessler A, Potsic WP (1994) Marsh RR. Type 1 tympanoplasty in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:487–490
Goodman WS, Wallace IR (1980) Tympanoplasty—25 years later. J Otolaryngol 9:155–164
Raine CH, Singh SD (1983) Tympanoplasty in children. J Laryngol Otol 97:217–221
Van Baarle PWL, Huygen PLM, Brinkman WFB (1983) Findings in surgery for chronic otitis media. A retrospective data-analysis of 2225 cases followed for two years. Clin Otolaryngol 8:151–158
Hilmi OJ, Bolton P, Ahsan F, Nunez DA (2004) Training opportunities for specialist registrars post-calmanization: audit of trainees’ exposure to repair of the tympanic membrane. J Laryngol Otol 4:409–412
Palva T, Ramsay H (1995) Myringoplasty and tympanoplasty-results related to training and experience. Clin Otolaryngol 20:329–335
Lau T, Tos M (1986) Tympanoplasty in children: an analysis of late results. Am J Otol 7:55–59
Black JH, Wormald PJ (1995) Myringoplasty-effects on hearing and contributing factors. S Afr Med J 85:41–43
The authors thank P.Sc.Salih Ergocen for the statistical analysis of the clinical data. Appreciation is expressed for the insight of Associate Professor Pasa Tevfik Cephe from Gazi University English Literature Department during the course of this manuscript preparation.
About this article
Cite this article
Emir, H., Ceylan, K., Kizilkaya, Z. et al. Success is a matter of experience: type 1 tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264, 595–599 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0240-6
- Type-1 tympanoplasty
- Influencing factors
- Experience of surgeon