Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Auditory steady-state responses and clinical applications

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The auditory steady-state responses to single continuous tones modulated in amplitude have been proposed as an alternative to objective frequency-specific audiometry. The aim of this study was to compare thresholds obtained by pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and by auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing or affected by hearing loss in adults and in order to evaluate the applicability of this objective test in no collaborative hearing-impaired subjects. Eleven people, 6 normal hearing and 5 with hearing loss, underwent PTA and multiple frequency auditory steady-state responses; simultaneous carrier tones (0.5, 1, 2 and 4 KHz) modulated in amplitude at different rates (77–105 Hz) were presented monaurally (TDH 49 earphones) at variable intensities (110–20 dB SPL). The mean threshold difference between PTA and multiple frequency auditory steady-state responses was 28 dB (standard deviation=14.2) and R correlation value at 0.5-1-2-4 kHz was 0.71 (P=0.0012) at the Pearson’s test. These differences were significantly smaller considering the hearing-impaired separately (11.7 dB, standard deviation=2.9). The results of this study confirm previous reports showing that the multiple auditory steady-state response method is an accurate predictor of the behavioural audiogram in patients with sensory-neural hearing impairments and can be used as a valid support for behavioural evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albera R, Canale G, Magnano M, Lacilla M, Morra, Rugiu MG, Cortesina G (1991) Relationship between pure-tone-audiometry and slow vertex responses. Acta Otorhinol Ital 11:551–562

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Albera R, Roberto C, Magnano M, Lacilla M, Morra B, Cortesina G (1991) Evaluations on slow vertex response waveform identification. Acta Otorhinol Ital 11:543–549

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen LT, Rickards FW, Clark GM (1991) A comparison of steady-state potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 90:2467–2479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dimitrijevic A, John M, Picton W (2004) Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear 25:68–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herdman AT, Stapells D (2003) Auditory steady state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol 42:237–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hood LJ (1998) Clinical applications of the ABR in neurological testing. In: Clinical applications of the auditory brainstem response, Singular Publishing Group Inc., San Diego–London, pp 67–91

  7. John MS, Brown DK, Muir PJ, Picton TW (2004) Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants. Ear Hear 25:539–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lins OG, Picton TW, Boucher BL, Darieux-Smith A, Champagne SC (1996) Frequency-specific audiometry using steady state responses. Ear Hear 17:81–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Luts H, Wouters J (2004) Hearing assessment by recording multiple auditory steady state responses: the influence of test duration. Int J Audiol 43:471–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Perez-Abalo MC, Savio G, Torres A, Martin V, Rodriguez E, Galan L (2001) Steady state responses to multiple amplitude modulated tones: an otimized method to test frequency-specific threshold in hearing-impaired children and normal hearing subjects. Ear Hear 22:200–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Picton TW (1978) The strategy of evoked potentials audiometry. In: Gerber SE, Mencher GT (eds) Early diagnosis of hearing loss. Grune & Strutton, New York, pp 279–308

    Google Scholar 

  12. Picton TW, Darieux-Smith A, Champagne SC, Whittingham J, Moran LM (1998) Objective evaluation of aided threshold using auditory steady state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 9:315–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rance G, Rickards FW, Cohen LT, De Vidi S, Clark GM (1995) Automated prediction of hearing threshold in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 16:499–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stapells DR (2002) The tone-evoked ABR: why it’s the measure of choise for young infants. Hear J 55:14–18

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stapells DR, Picton TW, Perez-Abalo MC, Read D, Smith A (1985) Frequency specificity in evoked potential audiometry. In: Jacobson JT (ed) The auditory brainstem response. College Hill Press, San Diego, pp 147–177

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Physiopathology, II Section of ENT, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Andrea Canale, Michelangelo Lacilla, Andrea Luigi Cavalot & Roberto Albera

  2. Str. S. Anna 78 bis, 10131, Torino, Italy

    Roberto Albera

Authors
  1. Andrea Canale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michelangelo Lacilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Luigi Cavalot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roberto Albera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Albera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Canale, A., Lacilla, M., Cavalot, A.L. et al. Auditory steady-state responses and clinical applications. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263, 499–503 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0017-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0017-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation