Abstract
Cholesteatoma occurs frequently with the destruction of the ossicles. The most commonly eroded ossicle has been reported to be the incus. Many studies report destruction of the long process and body of the incus. However, isolated erosion of the short process of the incus is an unusual finding. We present such a case with a slight conductive hearing loss that remained unchanged at 2 1/2 years postoperatively. The short process of the incus may contribute to hearing up to 10–15 dB. It is also possible that it plays a role in epitympanic aeration by supplying an attachment surface to the incudal folds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dornhoffer JL, Colvin GB, North P (1999) Evidence of residual disease in ossicles of patients undergoing cholesteatoma removal. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 119:89–92
Naguib MB, Aristegui M, Saleh E, Cokkeser Y, Russo A, Sanna M (1994) Surgical management of epitympanic cholesteatoma with intact ossicular chain: the modified Bondy technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 111:545–549
Palva T, Ramsay H (1996) Incudal folds and epitympanic aeration. Am J Otol 17:700–708
Rupa V, Krishnaswami H, Job A (1997) Autograft ossicle selection in cholesteatomatous ear disease: histopathological considerations. J Laryngol Otol 111:807–809
Sakagami M, Seo T, Node M, Fukazawa K, Sone M, Mishiro Y (1999) Cholesteatoma otitis media with intact ossicular chain. Auris Nasus Larynx 26:147–151
Shaan M, Landolfi M, Taibah A, Russo A, Szymanski M, Sanna M (1995) Modified Bondy technique. Am J Otol 16:695–697
Tos M (1979) Pathology of the ossicular chain in various chronic middle ear diseases. J Laryngol Otol 93:769–780
Tos M (1982) Modification of combined-approach tympanoplasty in attic cholesteatoma. Arch Otolaryngol 108:772–778
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aslan, A., Aslan, G.G. Considerations of isolated destruction of the short process of the incus in a case of cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 262, 844–846 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-004-0901-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-004-0901-2