Skip to main content
Log in

An examination of different Percoll density gradients and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) for the enrichment of fetal erythroblasts from maternal blood

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract 

Objective: To increase the yield of fetal erythroblasts from the blood of pregnant women by optimising and simplifying the enrichment procedure. Methods: By using an experimental system whereby cord blood was mixed with normal adult blood, we evaluated the recovery of fetal erythroblasts using different single or double percoll density gradients with or without subsequent enrichment by Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting (MACS). Results: The recovery of erythroblasts on single density gradients increased from 3%–68% of the input erythroblasts with an increase in the density of percoll from 1075 g/l–1098 g/l. Although the use of a double density gradient did eliminate most lymphocytes, it was accompanied by a significant loss of erythroblasts. The combination with MACS enrichment, however, lead to a almost 200 fold increase in the purity of erythroblasts. Conclusions: Erythroblasts are preferentially retained by higher density gradients. To enhance their purity a subsequent more specific enrichment step, such as MACS is advisable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 22 January 1999 / Accepted: 14 September 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smits, G., Holzgreve, W. & Hahn, S. An examination of different Percoll density gradients and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) for the enrichment of fetal erythroblasts from maternal blood. Arch Gynecol Obstet 263, 160–163 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004040050273

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004040050273

Navigation