Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of systemic immune-inflammation index for predicting late-onset fetal growth restriction

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

To determine a cut-off value for systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) (neutrophil × platelet/lymphocyte) in the prediction of fetal growth restriction (FGR).

Materials and methods

This case–control study was conducted retrospectively at the Obstetrics-Gynecology and Perinatology Clinics of Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women’s Health Education and Training Hospital. Singleton pregnant women with late-onset FGR who were followed up in outpatient clinics or hospitalized and whose pregnancy resulted at our hospital were included in the study group (group I). Healthy early and full-term singleton pregnant women with spontaneous labor who were followed up in the same hospital and whose pregnancy resulted at the same hospital were included in the control group (group II). Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to assess the performance of SII value in predicting FGR.

Results

We recruited 79 cases (pregnant with late-onset fetal growth restriction) and 79 controls (healthy pregnant), matched for age, body mass index, and parity. ΔSII was statistically significantly higher in the pregnant with late-onset FGR compared with healthy pregnant (123 vs − 65; p = 0.039). The values in ROC curves with the best balance of sensitivity/specificity were > 152 109/L (49% sensitivity, 70% specificity) and > 586 109/L (27% sensitivity, 90% specificity) for late-onset FGR.

Discussion

Higher ΔSII levels in maternal blood indicate an inflammatory process causing FGR. The cut-off value for ΔSII (> 586 109/L) at 90% specificity can be used as a screening test. In the presence of ΔSII levels > 586 109/L (27% sensitivity and 90% specificity), the physicians should be more cautious about risk for FGR. Therefore, pregnant women at risk for FGR should be checked more frequently and monitored closely. However, further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are avaible from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Fetal Growth Restriction (2021) ACOG practice bulletin, number 227. Obstet Gynecol 137(2):e16–e28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maulik D (2006) Fetal growth restriction: the etiology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49:228–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2012) Antiphospholipid syndrome: ACOG practice bulletin number 132. Obstet Gynecol 120:1514–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bada HS, Das A, Bauer CR, Shankaran S, Lester BM, Gard CC et al (2005) Low birth weight and preterm births: etiologic fraction attributable to prenatal drug exposure. J Perinatol 25:631–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laurini R, Laurin J, Marsal K (1994) Placental histology and fetal blood flow in intrauterine growth retardation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73:529–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilkins-Haug L, Roberts DJ, Morton CC (1995) Confined placental mosaicism and intrauterine growth retardation: a case-control analysis of placentas at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:44–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harper LM, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Crane JP, Cahill AG (2010) Effect of placenta previa on fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:330.e1-e5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cetin I, Mandò C, Parisi F (2017) Maternal characteristics predisposing to fetal growth restriction. In: Rajendram R, Preedy V, Patel V (eds) Diet, nutrition, and fetal programming. nutrition and health. Humana Press, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lausten-Thomsen U, Olsen M, Greisen G, Schmiegelow K (2014) Inflammatory markers in umbilical cord blood from small-for-gestational-age newborns. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 33(2):114–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bartha JL, Romero-Carmona R, Comino-Delgado R (2003) Inflammatory cytokines in intrauterine growth retardation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82(12):1099–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Andrikos A, Andrikos D, Schmidt B, Birdir C, Kimmig R, Gellhaus A, Köninger A (2022) Course of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in fetal growth restriction and correlation with biometric measurements, feto-maternal Doppler parameters and time to delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 305(3):597–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Orgul G, Agbal T, Celen S, Caglar AT (2021) Neuroprotective magnesium sulfate administration increases maternal neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index. Arch Gynecol Obstet 303(6):1433–1437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu B, Yang XR, Xu Y, Sun YF, Sun C, Guo W, Zhang X, Wang WM, Qiu SJ, Zhou J, Fan J (2014) Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 20(23):6212–6222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanacan A, Uyanik E, Unal C, Beksac MS (2020) A cut-off value for systemic immune-inflammation index in the prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 46(8):1333–1341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, Papageorghiou A, Baschat AA, Baker PN, Silver RM, Wynia K, Ganzevoort W (2016) Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 48(3):333–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41(4):1149–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Affero General Public License v3; published 2011. RStudio for Linux, version v2021.09.4+403.pro3 Ghost Orchid; September 19, 2022; developed by Posit, PBC

  18. Watson J, Round A, Hamilton W (2012) Raised inflammatory markers. BMJ 3(344):e454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen JH, Zhai ET, Yuan YJ, Wu KM, Xu JB, Peng JJ, Chen CQ, He YL, Cai SR (2017) Systemic immune-inflammation index for predicting prognosis of colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 23(34):6261–6272

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Biswas T, Kang KH, Gawdi R, Bajor D, Machtay M, Jindal C, Efird JT (2020) Using the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) as a mid-treatment marker for survival among patients with stage-III locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(21):7995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shang J, Han X, Zha H, Tao H, Li X, Yuan F, Chen G, Wang L, Ma J, Hu Y (2021) Systemic immune-inflammation index and changes of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic biomarkers for patients with pancreatic cancer treated with immune checkpoint blockade. Front Oncol 24(11):585271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Genc MR, Ford CE (2010) The clinical use of inflammatory markers during pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 22(2):116–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alissa EM, Algarni SA, Khaffji AJ, Al Mansouri NM (2021) Role of inflammatory markers in polycystic ovaries syndrome: In relation to insulin resistance. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 47(4):1409–1415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu Y, Zhou S, Liu Y, Zhai L, Sun X (2018) Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory markers in ovarian cancer: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Cancer 18(1):443

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Turgut E, Yildirim M, Sakcak B, Ayhan SG, Tekin OM, Sahin D (2022) Predicting miscarriage using systemic immune-inflammation index. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 48(3):587–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. D’Ambrosi F, Ruggiero M, Cesano N, Di Maso M, Cetera GE, Tassis B, Carbone IF, Ferrazzi E (2023) Risk of stillbirth in singleton fetuses with advancing gestational age at term: a 10-year experience of late third trimester prenatal screenings of 50,000 deliveries in a referral center in northern Italy. PLoS ONE 18(2):e0277262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim ET, Singh K, Moran A, Armbruster D, Kozuki N (2018) Obstetric ultrasound use in low and middle income countries: a narrative review. Reprod Health 15(1):129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cotechini T, Komisarenko M, Sperou A, Macdonald-Goodfellow S, Adams MA, Graham CH (2014) Inflammation in rat pregnancy inhibits spiral artery remodeling leading to fetal growth restriction and features of preeclampsia. J Exp Med 211(1):165–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all participants and their families who spent their precious time and participated in this research program. The authors are also thankful for the tireless efforts of the research team members.

Funding

There is no financial disclosure to be made for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FBF, ST, MLD, and YAR drafted the manuscript and collected data related to the subject. STS analyzed data to identify patterns. FBF, STS, and KYY were involved in drafting the manuscript and in the critical revision of the draft. ES and SO made a substantial contribution to the conception and design of the study. MLD, SC, and ATC participated in the design of the manuscript and the coordination of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fahri Burcin Firatligil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All patients and controls provided written informed consents and this study was approved by the Committee on Ethics of Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women’s Health Education and Training Hospital.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Firatligil, F.B., Sucu, S.T., Tuncdemir, S. et al. Evaluation of systemic immune-inflammation index for predicting late-onset fetal growth restriction. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07453-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07453-x

Keywords

Navigation