Skip to main content
Log in

A nomogram of preoperative indicators predicting lymph vascular space invasion in cervical cancer

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To develop predictive nomograms of lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Methods

We identified 403 patients with cervical cancer from the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients were divided into the training set (n = 242) and the validation set (n = 161), with patients in the training set subdivided into LVSI (+) and LVSI (−) groups according to postoperative pathology. Preoperative hematologic indexes were compared between the two subgroups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the independent risk factors for LVSI, from which a nomogram was constructed using the R package.

Results

LVSI (+) was present in 94 out of 242 patients in the training set, accompanied by a significant increase in the preoperative squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), white blood cells (WBC), neutrophil (NE), platelet (PLT), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), and tumor size (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that SCC, WBC, NE, NLR, PLR, SII, and tumor size were correlated with LVSI (P < 0.05), and multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, SCC, WBC, and NLR were independent risk factors for LVSI (P < 0.05). A nomogram was correspondingly established with good performance in predicting LVSI [training: ROC-AUC = 0.845 (95% CI: 0.731–0.843) and external validation: ROC-AUC = 0.704 (95% CI: 0.683–0.835)] and high accuracy (training: C-index = 0.787; external validation: C-index = 0.759).

Conclusion

The nomogram based on preoperative tumor size, SCC, WBC, and NLR had excellent accuracy and discriminative capability to assess the risk of LVSI in early-stage cervical cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

LVSI:

Lymph vascular space invasion

CC:

Cervical cancer

SCC:

Squamous cell carcinoma antigen

WBC:

White blood cells

NE:

Neutrophil

PLT:

Platelet

PLR:

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

NLR:

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

SII:

Systemic inflammation index

References

  1. Gillies RJ, Anderson AR, Gatenby RA, Morse DL (2010) The biology underlying molecular imaging in oncology: from genome to anatome and back again. Clin Radiol 65(7):517–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P, Zegers CM, Gillies R, Boellard R, Dekker A et al (2012) Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer 48(4):441–446

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Graves S, Seagle BL, Strohl AE, Shahabi S, Nieves-Neira W (2017) Survival after pelvic exenteration for cervical cancer: a national cancer database study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27(2):390–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Levinson K, Beavis AL, Purdy C, Rositch AF, Viswanathan A, Wolfson AH, Kelly MG, Tewari KS, McNally L, Guntupalli SR et al (2021) Beyond Sedlis-A novel histology-specific nomogram for predicting cervical cancer recurrence risk: an NRG/GOG ancillary analysis. Gynecol Oncol 162(3):532–538

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sullivan T, Yacoub JH, Harkenrider MM, Small W Jr, Surucu M, Shea SM (2018) Providing MR imaging for cervical cancer brachytherapy: lessons for radiologists. Radiographics 38(3):932–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu Q, Shi D, Dou S, Shi L, Liu M, Dong L, Chang X, Wang M (2019) Radiomics analysis of multiparametric MRI evaluates the pathological features of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 49(4):1141–1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li J, Li S, Chen R, Lu X (2017) Increased risk of poor survival in ovarian cancer patients with high expression of SNAI2 and lymphovascular space invasion. Oncotarget 8(6):9672–9685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsuo K, Sheridan TB, Mabuchi S, Yoshino K, Hasegawa K, Studeman KD, Im DD, Rosenshein NB, Roman LD, Sood AK (2014) Estrogen receptor expression and increased risk of lymphovascular space invasion in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 133(3):473–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao Y, Yang N, Wang X, Huang Y, Zhou X, Zhang D (2020) Potential roles of lymphovascular space invasion based on tumor characteristics provide important prognostic information in T1 tumors with ER and HER2 positive breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 22(12):2275–2285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li X, Xu C, Yu Y, Guo Y, Sun H (2021) Prediction of lymphovascular space invasion using a combination of tenascin-C, cox-2, and PET/CT radiomics in patients with early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 21(1):866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Han S, Liu X, Ju S, Mu W, Abulikemu G, Zhen Q, Yang J, Zhang J, Li Y, Liu H et al (2023) New mechanisms and biomarkers of lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer: reflections from plasma proteomics. Clin Proteomics 20(1):35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bouvard V, Wentzensen N, Mackie A, Berkhof J, Brotherton J, Giorgi-Rossi P, Kupets R, Smith R, Arrossi S, Bendahhou K et al (2021) The IARC perspective on cervical cancer screening. N Engl J Med 385(20):1908–1918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zannoni GF, Travaglino A, Raffone A, Arciuolo D, D’Alessandris N, Scaglione G, Tralongo P, Inzani F, Angelico G, Santoro A (2021) Depth of stromal invasion as the most prognostically relevant regression system in locally advanced cervical cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta analysis grading. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101772

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Santoro A, Angelico G, Inzani F, Arciuolo D, Spadola S, Valente M, D’Alessandris N, Piermattei A, Fiorentino V et al (2020) Standard ultrastaging compared to one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) for the detection of sentinel lymph node metastases in early stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 30(12):1871–1877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gorostidi Pulgar Diaz M, de la Noval B, Gil-Ibanez B, Lago Leal V, Jaunarena Marin I, Padilla IP (2017) lymphovascular space invasion for endometrial cancer: undertreatment and overtreatment risks: a survey of the Spanish gynecologic oncology group. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27(6):1191–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Logani S, Herdman AV, Little JV, Moller KA (2008) Vascular “pseudo invasion” in laparoscopic hysterectomy specimens: a diagnostic pitfall. Am J Surg Pathol 32(4):560–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman WT, Heintz AP, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S (2003) Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 83(Suppl 1):41–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Xie X, Song K, Cui B, Jiang J, Yang X, Kong B (2018) A comparison of the prognosis between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 23(3):522–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos SM, Cho KR, Chon HS, Chu C, Clark R, Cohn D et al (2019) Cervical cancer, version 32019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17(1):64–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park KJ, Selinger CI, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Duggan MA, Kiyokawa T, Mills AM, Ordi J, Otis CN, Plante M, Stolnicu S et al (2022) Dataset for the reporting of carcinoma of the cervix: recommendations from the international collaboration on cancer reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol Off Int Soc Gynecol Pathol 41(Suppl 1):S64-s89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Santoro A, Inzani F, Angelico G, Arciuolo D, Bragantini E, Travaglino A, Valente M, D’Alessandris N, Scaglione G, Sfregola S et al (2023) Recent advances in cervical cancer management: a review on novel prognostic factors in primary and recurrent tumors. Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Salvatici M, Achilarre MT, Sandri MT, Boveri S, Vanna Z, Landoni F (2016) Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) during follow-up of cervical cancer patients: Role in the early diagnosis of recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 142(1):115–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan YM, Ng TY, Ngan HY, Wong LC (2002) Monitoring of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in invasive cervical cancer: is it cost-effective? Gynecol Oncol 84(1):7–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kubik S, Moszynska-Zielinska M, Fijuth J, Tomalczyk A, Jesionek-Kupnicka D, Ura L, Gottwald LM (2019) Assessment of the relationship between serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) concentration in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix and the risk of relapse. Prz Menopauzalny 18(1):23–26

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M (2010) Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell 140(6):883–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. McMillan DC (2013) The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow prognostic score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 39(5):534–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J, Gray R, Arriagada R, Raina V, Abraham M, Medeiros Alencar VH, Badran A, Bonfill X et al (2013) Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet 381(9869):805–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kemal Y, Yucel I, Ekiz K, Demirag G, Yilmaz B, Teker F, Ozdemir M (2014) Elevated serum neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratios could be useful in lung cancer diagnosis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15(6):2651–2654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vesely MD, Schreiber RD (2013) Cancer immunoediting: antigens, mechanisms, and implications to cancer immunotherapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1284(1):1–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Heeren AM, Kenter GG, Jordanova ES, de Gruijl TD (2015) CD14(+) macrophage-like cells as the linchpin of cervical cancer perpetrated immune suppression and early metastatic spread: a new therapeutic lead? Oncoimmunology 4(6):e1009296

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu M, Feng M, He F, Han B, Ma K, Zeng X, Liu Z, Liu X, Li J, Cao H et al (2018) Pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratio predict clinical outcome and prognosis for cervical Cancer. Clin Chim Acta 483:296–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu J, Chen M, Liang C, Su W (2017) Prognostic value of the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Oncotarget 8(8):13400–13412

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang H, Liu Q, Zhu L, Zhang Y, Lu X, Wu Y, Liu L (2019) Prognostic value of preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with cervical cancer. Sci Rep 9(1):3284

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zheng RR, Huang M, Jin C, Wang HC, Yu JT, Zeng LC, Zheng FY, Lin F (2016) Cervical cancer systemic inflammation score: a novel predictor of prognosis. Oncotarget 7(12):15230–15242

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang K, Ai Y, Li Y, Jia L (2022) Nomogram models for the prognosis of cervical cancer: a SEER-based study. Front Oncol 12:961678

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Cui L, Yu T, Kan Y, Dong Y, Luo Y, Jiang X (2022) Multi-parametric MRI-based peritumoral radiomics on prediction of lymph-vascular space invasion in early-stage cervical cancer. Diagn Interv Radiol 28(4):312–321

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Du W, Wang Y, Li D, Xia X, Tan Q, Xiong X, Li Z (2021) Preoperative prediction of lymphovascular space invasion in cervical cancer with radiomics -based nomogram. Front Oncol 11:637794

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Yu Z, Zhihui Q, Linrui L, Long L, Qibing W (2023) Machine learning-based models for assessing postoperative risk factors in patients with cervical cancer. Acad Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.09.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu Y, Wang S, Chen Y, Liao Y, Yin X, Li T, Wang R, Luo X, Xu W, Zhou J et al (2023) A multicenter study on preoperative assessment of lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage cervical cancer based on multimodal MR radiomics. J Magn Reson Imaging 58(5):1638–1648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Wuxi Taihu Lake Talent Plan, Support for Leading Talents in Medical and Health Profession. We thank Chang Xiong for her help in statistics and analysis of data.

Funding

This study was funded by the Wuxi Taihu Lake Talent Plan, Support for Leading Talents in Medical and Health Profession.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

QG: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. YG: data analysis, Manuscript writing. YL: data analysis, manuscript writing. WL: data analysis. ZZ: data collection. YM: data collection. XX: data analysis, manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xizhong Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

This research was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University (No. LS2022040).

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from individual or guardian participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Q., Gao, Y., Lin, Y. et al. A nomogram of preoperative indicators predicting lymph vascular space invasion in cervical cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 309, 2079–2087 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07385-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07385-6

Keywords

Navigation