Skip to main content
Log in

Do the change in β-hCG values between the 0th and 4th days in tubal ectopic pregnancy treatment with a single-dose methotrexate (MTX) protocol predict the need for a second dose of MTX?

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The single-dose methotrexate (MTX) regimen is effective and minimizes side effects but an additional second dose is needed in case of failure in an ectopic pregnancy (EP). We aimed to predict the additional MTX dose by evaluating the change in β-hCG values between day 0 and day 4 in EPs with administered single-dose MTX regimen.

Method

A total of 454 tubal EPs between 2013 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Cases cured with a single dose of MTX without an additional dose were accepted as the control group, and cases under a single-dose regimen were cured by applying a second dose of MTX on the 7th day were accepted as the study group. Obstetric and demographic characteristics and the change in β-hCG values compared in both groups.

Results

Age, body mass index (BMI), gravida, smoking, abdominal surgery, presence of IUDs, initial β-hCG levels (0th day), and EP size were similar in both groups, but the presence of previous EP history was significantly higher in the study group. The change of β-hCG from days 0 and 4 determined that a 20% increase predicts the need for a second dose of MTX with 72.4% sensitivity, and 87.8% negative predictive value (NPV).

Conclusion

The single-dose MTX protocol is successful in 83.3% of convenient cases (as the control group), but an increase of 20% in β-hCG between days 0 and 4 predicts the patients who need to be administered second-dose MTX, and thus, a double-dose MTX protocol will be achieved early.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting this study are available through the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. DeCherney AH, Nathan L, Laufer N, Roman AS (2019) Current diagnosis & treatment: obstetrics & gynecology, 12th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Butts S, Sammel M, Hummel A, Chittams J, Barnhart K (2003) Risk factors and clinical features of recurrent ectopic pregnancy: a case control study. Fertil Steril 80(6):1340–1344. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(03)02206-4. (PMID: 14667866)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marret H, Fauconnier A, Dubernard G, Misme H, Lagarce L, Lesavre M, Fernandez H, Mimoun C, Tourette C, Curinier S, Rabishong B, Agostini A (2016) Overview and guidelines of off-label use of methotrexate in ectopic pregnancy: report by CNGOF. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 205:105–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.489. (Epub 2016 Aug 3 PMID: 27572300)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang C, Cai J, Geng Y, Gao Y (2017) Multiple-dose and double-dose versus single-dose administration of methotrexate for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 34(4):38391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.01.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. ACOG Practice Bulletin No (2018) 193: tubal ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 131:e91–e103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fernandez H, Capmas P, Lucot JP et al (2013) Fertility after ectopic pregnancy: the DEMETER randomized trial. Hum Reprod 28(5):1247–1253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Natale A, Candiani M, Barbieri M, Calia C, Odorizzi MP, Busacca M (2004) Pre- and post-treatment patterns of human chorionic gonadotropin for early detection of persistence after a single dose of methotrexate for ectopic pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 117:87–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kazandi M, Turan V (2011) Ectopic pregnancy; risk factors and comparison of intervention success rates in tubal ectopic pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 38:67–70 ([PubMed: 21485731])

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnhart K, Coutifaris C, Esposito M (2001) The pharmacology of methotrexate. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2(3):409–417. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2.3.409. (PMID: 11336595)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grab D, Merz E, Eichhorn KH, Tutschek B, Kagan KO, Heling KS, Faber R, Klaritsch P, Rempen A, Kähler C, Henrich W, Manegold-Brauer G, Helmy S, Hoopmann M (2023) Basic gynecologic ultrasound examination (Level I): DEGUM, ÖGUM, and SGUM recommendations. Ultraschall Med 44(2):151–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pape J, Bajka A, Strutas D, Burkhardt T, Imesch P, Fink D, Samartzis EP, Bajka M (2023) The predictive value of decisive and soft ultrasound criteria for ectopic pregnancy identification in 321 preoperative cases. Ultraschall Med 44(1):e47–e61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barnhart K, Hummel AC, Sammel MD, Menon S, Jain J, Chakhtoura N (2007) Use of “2-dose” regimen of methotrexate to treat ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 87:250–256 ([PubMed: 17097649])

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhattacharya S, McLernon DJ, Lee AJ, Bhattacharya S (2012) Reproductive outcomes following ectopic pregnancy: register-based retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med 9(6):e1001243. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001243. (Epub 2012 Jun 19. PMID: 22723747; PMCID: PMC3378618)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang D, Shi W, Li C, Yuan JJ, Xia W, Xue RH, Sun J, Zhang J (2016) Risk factors for recurrent ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study. BJOG 123(Suppl 3):82–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14011. (PMID: 27627605)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin Q, Lin N, Wang G, Zheng X, Hua R (2021) A novel predict factor that increases the success rate of methotrexate treatment in fallopian tube pregnancy. Ann Transl Med 9(2):146. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7914.PMID:33569448;PMCID:PMC7867891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shatkin Hamish N, Wolf M, Tendler R, Sharon A, Bornstein J, Odeh M (2020) Early prediction of methotrexate treatment outcome in tubal ectopic pregnancy based on days 0 and 4 human chorionic gonadotropin levels. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 46(7):1104–1109. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14259. (Epub 2020 May 14 PMID: 32406562)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Akselim B, Karaşin SS, Sabir YA (2021) Can the additional dose requirement be determined before the seventh day to successfully treat tubal ectopic pregnancy with a single-dose methotrexate protocol? J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 31(9):1046–1050. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2021.09.1046. (PMID: 34500519)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lavie G, Kais M, Tendler R, Marwan O, Bornstein J, Sharon A (2021) Rate of hourly change in serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels in ectopic pregnancy can predict the success of treatment with single-dose methotrexate: a retrospective observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 265:39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.008. (Epub 2021 Aug 9 PMID: 34418695)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Agostini A, Blanc K, Ronda I, Romain F, Capelle M, Blanc B (2007) Prognostic value of human chorionic gonadotropin changes after methotrexate injection for ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 88(2):504–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.138. (Epub 2007 Apr 6 PMID: 17418833)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all participants and their families who spent their precious time and participated in this research program. We are also thankful for the tireless efforts of the research team members

Funding

There is no financial disclosure to be made for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YAR: Project Development, Data Collection or Management, Manuscript Writing/Editing. AA: Project Development, Data Management, Manuscript Writing/Editing. MÖ: Data Collection and Management, Project Development. TK: Data Management, Data Analysis, Project Development, Manuscript Writing/Editing. FBF, MLD, SE: Supervision, Manuscript Writing/Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yıldız Akdaş Reis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and human rights

Ethics committee approval was taken for this retrospective study from the Local Ethics Committee. All authors and the study protocol have complied with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki regarding the ethical conduct of research involving human subjects.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from patients who participated in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akdaş Reis, Y., Akay, A., Özkan, M. et al. Do the change in β-hCG values between the 0th and 4th days in tubal ectopic pregnancy treatment with a single-dose methotrexate (MTX) protocol predict the need for a second dose of MTX?. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07116-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07116-3

Keywords

Navigation