Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Posterior rectus fascia prolapse (PREFAP) repair: a new native tissue approach to pelvic organ prolapse via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery

  • Urogynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in women. During lifetime, up to 40% of all women will develop (POP).

Materials and methods

Between June and December 2021, five patients were successfully treated via vNOTES Posterior Rectus Fascia Prolapse ( PREFAP) repair. No intra-operative complications or conversions occurred.

Conclusion

In this study we demonstrated a new technique for prolapse repair, harvesting the autologous posterior rectus fascia sheath via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) as an alternative for a synthetic mesh

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Data availability

No new data were created or analysed during this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

References

  1. Kahn MA, Breitkopf CR, Valley MT et al (2005) Pelvic organ support study (POSST) and bowel symptoms: straining at stool is associated with perineal and anterior vaginal descent in a general gynecologic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(5):1516–1522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glazener CM, Breeman S, Elders A et al (2017) Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). The Lancet 389(10067):381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellington DR, Richter HE (2013) Indications, contraindications, and complications of mesh in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 56(2):276–288

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schimpf MO, Abed H, Sanses T et al (2016) Graft and mesh use in transvaginal prolapse repair. Obstet Gynecol 128(1):81–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal Mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med 364(19):1826–1836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. FDA’s Activities: Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/urogynecologic-surgical-mesh-implants/fdas-activities-urogynecologic-surgical-mesh#:~:text=The%20FDA's%20efforts%20on%20urogynecologic,devices%20to%20benefit%20from%20them Accessed 4 September 2022

  7. Reid FM, Aucott L, Glazener CMA et al (2022) PROSPECT: 4- and 6-year follow-up of a randomised trial of surgery for vaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05308-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374(9695):1105–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I et al (2016) HALON-hysterectomy by transabdominal laparoscopy or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a randomised controlled trial (study protocol). BMJ Open 6(8):e011546

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, le Roy I et al (2019) Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 126(1):105–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baekelandt JF, de Mulder P, le Roy I et al (2021) Adnexectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy: results of a first randomised controlled trial (NOTABLE trial). BJOG 128(11):1782–1791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baekelandt JF (2018) Transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a new approach to myomectomy. Fertil Steril 109(1):179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Housmans S, Noori N, Kapurubandara S et al (2020) Systematic review and meta-analysis on hysterectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (Vnotes) compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. J Clin Med 9(12):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lowenstein L, Matanes E, Lauterbach R et al (2021) Feasibility and learning curve of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and uterosacral ligament suspension in apical compartment prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 27(1):e171–e176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reid FM, Elders A, Breeman S et al (2021) How common are complications following polypropylene mesh, biological xenograft and native tissue surgery for pelvic organ prolapse? A secondary analysis from the PROSPECT trial. BJOG 128(13):2180–2189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee JC, Olaitan OK, Lopez-Soler R et al (2013) Expanding the envelope: the posterior rectus sheath-liver vascular composite allotransplant. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(2):209e–218e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seth J, Toia B, Ecclestone H et al (2019) The autologous rectus fascia sheath sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy, a mesh free alternative in patients with recurrent uterine and vault prolapse: a contemporary series and literature review. Urol Ann 11(2):193–197

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Asfour V, Nikolopoulos KI, Digesu GA, Emery S, Khan Z (2022) Modified autologous fascial sling technique ('sling on a string’) for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 33(2):435–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Korenkov M, Beckers A, Koebke J, Lefering R, Tiling T, Troidl H (2001) Biomechanical and morphological types of the linea alba and its possible role in the pathogenesis of midline incisional hernia. Eur J Surg 167(12):909–914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Investigation: JB; conceptualization: JB; methodology: TT; supervision: JB; writing—original draft preparation: LM; validation: MM; data curation: SH; writing—review˛and Editing: JD.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Baekelandt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Jan Baekelandt discloses consultancy for Applied Medical.

Consent for participate

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this article and any accompanying images.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baekelandt, J., Matak, L., Merckx, M. et al. Posterior rectus fascia prolapse (PREFAP) repair: a new native tissue approach to pelvic organ prolapse via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307, 2041–2045 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07021-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07021-9

Keywords

Navigation