Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between molecular markers and lymphadenectomy and lymphovascular space invasion in endometrial cancer

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Relationship between pathologic parameters, surgical parameters, or lymph node status with oncologic outcomes is not fully elucidated in endometrial cancer (EC). We want to investigate the molecular classification of uterine cancer in the Turkish population and its relationship between lymphadenectomy and lymph node metastasis.

Methods

In this study, 100 patients' clinical and pathologic data diagnosed with EC were analyzed. Pathologic and molecular parameters were investigated and compared them with clinical parameters.

Results

According to the molecular analysis, 16 patients (16%) had p53 mutation, 3 patients (3%) were classified as POLE mutant group, 38 (38%) patients in the MSI group, and the remaining 43 patients (43%) into the no specific mutation profile (NSMP) group. Lymph node metastasis rate was significantly higher in copy number high (CNH) group compared to the others. In the CNH group, 29 of 437 (6.6%) dissected lymph nodes had metastasis. The median OS was the highest in the POLE group (72 months) and lowest in the CNH group (36 months).

Conclusion

Endometrial cancer patients showed significantly different overall and disease-free survival according to the molecular subtypes and it was consistent with the literature, Lymph node metastasis risk was the highest in CNH group. MSI status is important for the lymph node metastasis risk but not all abnormalities, especially PMS2 and MLH1 expression changes showed the highest risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (2020) Corpus uteri Source: Globocan 2020

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70:7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/CAAC.21590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexa M, Hasenburg A, Battista MJ et al (2021) Cancers the TCGA molecular classification of endometrial cancer and ıts possible ımpact on adjuvant treatment decisions. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061478

  4. Talhouk A, McConechy MK, Leung S et al (2017) Confirmation of ProMisE: a simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer. Cancer 123:802–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/CNCR.30496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lé On-Castillo A, De Boer SM, Powell ME et al (2020) Molecular classification of the PORTEC-3 trial for high-risk endometrial cancer: impact on prognosis and benefit from adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 38:3388–3397. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kommoss S, McConechy MK, Kommoss F et al (2018) Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 29:1180–1188. https://doi.org/10.1093/ANNONC/MDY058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bidzinski M, Danska-Bidzinska A, Rychlik A, et al (2022) Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma, is it the new era of precision medicine? Ginekol Pol 93:. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2021.0216

  8. Church DN, Stelloo E, Nout RA et al (2015) Prognostic significance of POLE proofreading mutations in endometrial cancer. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 107:402. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raffone A, Travaglino A, Raimondo D et al (2022) Lymphovascular space invasion in endometrial carcinoma: a prognostic factor independent from molecular signature. Gynecol Oncol 165:192–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2022.01.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leon-Castillo A, Horeweg N, Peters EEM et al (2022) Prognostic relevance of the molecular classification in high-grade endometrial cancer for patients staged by lymphadenectomy and without adjuvant treatment. Gynecol Oncol 164:577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2022.01.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li X, Cheng Y, Dong Y et al (2021) Development and validation of predictive model for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: a SEER analysis. Ann Transl Med 9:538–538. https://doi.org/10.21037/ATM-20-5034

  12. Vargas R, Rauh-Hain JA, Clemmer J et al (2014) Tumor size, depth of invasion, and histologic grade as prognostic factors of lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer: a SEER analysis. Gynecol Oncol 133:216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2014.02.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Okamoto K, Nakamura K, Haraga J, Masuyama H (2022) Molecular characteristics of metastatic lesions have superior prognostic ımpact on endometrial cancer. Anticancer Res 42:4535–4543. https://doi.org/10.21873/ANTICANRES.15956

  14. Wang Z, Sun Y, Gao B et al (2014) Two co-existing germline mutations P53 V157D and PMS2 R20Q promote tumorigenesis in a familial cancer syndrome. Cancer Lett 342:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CANLET.2013.08.032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao L (2018) Mismatch repair protein expression in patients with stage II and III sporadic colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett 15:8053–8061. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

For this study, we had a funding from the Afyonkarahisar Health and Science University scientific research project (BAP-20.genel 005/2020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filiz Bilir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We do not have conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bilir, F., Arıoz, D.T., Arıkan, S.E. et al. Relationship between molecular markers and lymphadenectomy and lymphovascular space invasion in endometrial cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 308, 941–946 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07005-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07005-9

Keywords

Navigation