Skip to main content
Log in

Smooth endoplasmic reticulum cluster presence does not affect embryo ploidy

  • Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We examined the impacts of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum cluster (sERC) presence on embryonic development and blastocyst ploidy.

Methods

Patients who underwent oocyte retrieval from January 2019 to November 2021 were included in the study. We classified the oocytes into three groups: normal oocytes in the sERC ( −) cycle, normal oocytes in the sERC ( +) cycle, and sERC ( +) oocytes. Next, the levels of serum estradiol, progesterone, anti-Mullerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and human menopausal gonadotropin were compared between the groups. Moreover, fertilization, degeneration, and abnormal fertilization rates were compared between groups. To investigate developmental outcomes, the blastocyst and good-quality blastocyst rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection were compared. The quality of the transferred blastocysts was evaluated at follow-up. Additionally, embryos were submitted for next-generation sequencing analysis to examine the effect of sERC presence on ploidy.

Results

The sERC ( +) group had significantly higher serum estradiol, serum progesterone, and serum anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations compared to those in the sERC ( −) group (P < 0.01). The abnormal fertilization rate was higher in the sERC ( +) cycle–sERC ( +) oocyte group (16.1%; 37/230) than in the sERC ( +) cycle–normal oocyte (6.2%; 63/971) and sERC ( −) cycle–normal oocyte groups (7.1%; 174/2467) (P < 0.01). After embryo transfer, nine women gave birth, and no confirmed congenital anomalies were observed. There was no significant difference in ploidy between the sERC ( +) and sERC ( −) groups.

Conclusion

The occurrence rates of embryos with euploidy were similar between the sERC ( +) and sERC ( −) groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Sá R, Cunha M, Silva J, Luis A, Oliviera C, Teixera da Silva J, Barros A, Sousa M (2011) Ultrastructure of tubular smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates in human metaphase II oocytes and clinical implications. Fertil Steril 96:143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ebner T, Moser M, Shebl O, Sommerguber M, Tews G (2008) Prognosis of oocytes showing aggregation of smooth endoplasmic reticulum. Reprod Biomed Online 16:113–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hattori H, Nakamura Y, Nakajo Y, Araki Y, Kyono K (2014) Deliveries of babies with normal health derived from oocytes with smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters. J Assist Reprod Genet 31:1461–1467

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Itoi F, Asano Y, Shimizu M, Honnma H, Murata Y (2016) Embryological outcomes in cycles with human oocytes containing large tubular smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters after conventional in vitro fertilization. Gynecol Endocrinol 32:315–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Setti AS, Figueira RCS, Braga DPDA, de Azevedo M, Ioconelli A, Borges E (2016) Oocytes with smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters originate blastocysts with impaired implantation potential. Fertile Steril 106:1718–1724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Otsuki J, Okada A, Morimoto K, Nagai Y, Kudo H (2004) The relationship between pregnancy outcome and smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters in MII human oocytes. Hum Reprod 19:1591–1597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akarsu C, Caǧlar G, Vicdan K, Sözen E, Biberoğlu K (2009) Smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregations in all retrieved oocytes causing recurrent multiple anomalies. Fertil Steril 92:1496.e1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mateizel I, Van Landuyt L, Tournaye H, Verheyen G (2013) Deliveries of normal healthy babies from embryos originating from oocytes showing the presence of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates. Hum Reprod 28:2111–2117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Whitney JB, Schiewe MC, Anderson RE (2016) Single center validation of routine blastocyst biopsy implementation. J Assist Reprod Genet 33:1507–1513

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA (2015) Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 104:1503–1512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Forman EJ, Tao X, Ferry KM, Taylor D, Tress NR, Scott RT (2012) Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates. Human Reprod 27:1217–1222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee HL, McCulloh DH, Hodes-Wertz AA, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA (2015) In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening improves implantation and live birth in women age 40 through 43. J Assist Reprod Genet 32:435–444

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gorodeckaja J, Neumann S, McCollin A, Ottolini CS, Wang J, Ahuja K, Handyside A, Summers M (2019) High implantation and clinical pregnancy rates with single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer and optional aneuploidy testing for all patients. Hum Fertil 23:256–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Murugappan G, Shahine LK, Perfetto CO, Hickok L, Lathi RB (2016) Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. Human Reprod 31:1668–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Somigliana E, Busnelli A, Paffoni A, Vigano P, Riccaboni A, Rubio C, Capalbo A (2019) Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. Fertil Steril 111:1169–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Neal SA, Morin SJ, Franasiak JM, Goodman LR, Juneau CR, Forman EJ, Werner MD, Scott RT (2018) Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage. Fertil Steril 110:896–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mizobe Y, Kuwatsuru Y, Kuroki Y, Fukumoto Y, Tokudome M, Moewaki H, Watanabe M, Iwakawa T, Takeuchi K (2022) A novel trophectoderm biopsy technique for all blastocyst stages. Reprod Med Biol 21:e12418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Takeuchi K (2021) Pre-implantation genetic testing: past, present, future. Reprod Med Biol 20:27–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mizobe Y, Kuwatsuru Y, Kuroki Y, Fukumoto Y, Tokudome M, Moewaki H, Watanabe M, Tabira T, Iwakawa T, Takeuchi K (2021) The effect of repeated cryopreservation and thawing using CryoTip on the clinical outcomes of embryos. Reprod Med Biol 20:176–181

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Viotti M, Victor AR, Barnes FL, Zouves CG, Besser AG, Grifo JA, Cheng EH, Lee MS, Horcajadas JA, Corti L, Fiorentino F, Spinella F, Minasi MG, Greco E, Munné S (2021) Using outcome data from one thousand mosaic embryo transfers to formulate an embryo ranking system for clinical use. Fertil Steril 115:1212–1224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dal Canto M, Guglielmo MC, Mignini Renzini M, Fadini R, Moutier C, Merola M, De Ponti E, Coticchio G (2017) Dysmorphic patterns are associated with cytoskeletal alterations in human oocytes. Hum Reprod 32:750–757

    Google Scholar 

  22. Otsuki J, Iwasaki T, Katada Y, Tsutsumi Y, Tsuji Y, Furuhashi K, Kokeguchi S, Shiotani M (2018) A higher incidence of cleavage failure in oocytes containing smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters. J Assist Reprod Genet 35:899–905

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Saito H, Otsuki J, Takahashi H, Hirata R, Habara T, Hayashi N (2019) A higher incidence of smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters with aromatase inhibitors. Reprod Med Biol 18:384–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by YM, MT, and YK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YM and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yamato Mizobe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

The study was performed with the approval of the institutional review board of the Takeuchi Ladies Clinic (approval number 22–1). Opt-out information was posted on a hospital bulletin board.

Human and animal rights

All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standard of the responsible committees on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mizobe, Y., Kuwatsuru, Y., Kuroki, Y. et al. Smooth endoplasmic reticulum cluster presence does not affect embryo ploidy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307, 1607–1612 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-06969-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-06969-y

Keywords

Navigation