Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perineal suture to maintain pessary for pelvic organ prolapse: some questions

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

References

  1. Pérez-Febles M, De-Miguel-Manso S, García-García E, López-País M, Cuaresma-González M, Ibañez-Nieto M (2022) Pessary with perineal suture for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: description and benefit of the technique. Arch Gynecol Obstet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06739-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsubara S, Ohki Y (2010) Can a ring pessary have a lasting effect to reverse uterine prolapse even after its removal? J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36(2):459–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Handa VL, Jones M (2002) Do pessaries prevent the progression of pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13(6):349–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was obtained for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan

    Shigeki Matsubara & Yuji Takei

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koga Red Cross Hospital, 1150 Shimoyama, Koga, Ibaraki, 306-0014, Japan

    Shigeki Matsubara

Authors
  1. Shigeki Matsubara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuji Takei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SM: identification of the significance, manuscript writing. YT: manuscript revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeki Matsubara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Approval of institutional review board

Not needed.

Patient anonymity

Not applicable.

Ethical approval

Not needed.

Human participants or animal experiments

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsubara, S., Takei, Y. Perineal suture to maintain pessary for pelvic organ prolapse: some questions. Arch Gynecol Obstet 308, 1909–1910 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06904-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06904-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation