Skip to main content
Log in

Response to Letter to Reply to the authors’ response to the letter to the editor concerning the article “Randomized control trial on the effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy”

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ikechebelu JI, Eleje GU, Joe-Ikechebelu NN et al (2021) Randomized control trial on effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 304(3):815–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05957-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad G, Baker J, Finnerty J, Phillips K, Watson A (2019) Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1(1):CD006583. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ikechebelu JI, Eleje GU, Joe-Ikechebelu NN et al (2022) Response to Letter to “Randomized control trial on the effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy.” Arch Gynecol Obstet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06428-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wynn-Hebden A, Bouch DC (2020) Anaesthesia for the obese patient. BJA Educ 20(11):388–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2020.07.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Phan K, Kim JS, Kim JH et al (2017) Anesthesia duration as an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications in adults undergoing elective ACDF. Global Spine J 7(8):727–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217701105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JII: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing. GUE: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing. NNJ: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing. CDO: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing. BCO: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing. EOU: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing. CEN: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing. CCO: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing. PCO: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Uchenna Eleje.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that there was no conflict of interest. This study did not receive any funding by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ikechebelu, J.I., Eleje, G.U., Joe‑Ikechebelu, N.N. et al. Response to Letter to Reply to the authors’ response to the letter to the editor concerning the article “Randomized control trial on the effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy”. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307, 1659–1660 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06716-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06716-9

Navigation