Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can endometrial thickness at baseline or maximum stimulated levels during IVF predict the presence of endometrial polyps in women with two failed embryo transfers?

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether different measurements of endometrial thickness pre-IVF cycle and during the IVF cycles as measured by transvaginal ultrasound are associated with the absence or presence of endometrial polyps.

Design

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a university-affiliated fertility center. Patients were women who underwent two embryo transfer cycles and failed to conceive. Interventions: hysteroscopic evaluation and resection of any masses.

Results

There was no difference on comparing the groups with and without polyps in the mean endometrial thicknesses at baseline scans pre-treatment or during IVF cycle. For women who failed two embryo transfer cycles, at any given endometrial thickness the probability of the presence of a polyp was 30–40%. ROC curves failed to detect an actionable relationship with different endometrial thicknesses and the relationship with an endometrial polyp, with most areas under the curve being just above 0.5. However, once the maximum stimulated endometrial thickness was ≥ 13 mm, there was a 70% chance of a polyp being noted at hysteroscopy. This was a statistical difference in the probability of a polyp being present as compared to the lesser thicknesses (p = 0.05).

Conclusion

Baseline or maximum stimulated endometrial thickness at IVF fails to predict with accuracy the presence of a polyp. However, if the maximum stimulated thickness was at least 13 mm, there was a higher probability of a uterine polyp being present. Such a cutoff would nevertheless miss most polyps. At any baseline thickness on CD 2–5, a polyp has a 30–40% probability of being present in women who failed two embryo transfers. ROC curves suggest that at baseline, or maximum stimulated endometrial thickness, the ability to predict a polyp is no better than flipping a coin. As such, endometrial cavity evaluation for polyps is legitimate in women with two embryo transfers irrelevant of the baseline or stimulated thickness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Dreisler E, Stampe Sorensen S, Ibsen PH, Lose G (2009) Prevalence of endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20–74 years. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(1):102–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hinckley MD, Milki AA (2004) 1000 office-based hysteroscopies prior to in vitro fertilization: feasibility and findings. JSLS 8(2):103–107

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fatemi HM, Kasius JC, Timmermans A et al (2010) Prevalence of unsuspected uterine cavity abnormalities diagnosed by office hysteroscopy prior to in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 25(8):1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Al Chami A, Saridogan E (2017) Endometrial Polyps and Subfertility. J Obstet Gynaecol India 67(1):9–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0929-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rackow BW, Jorgensen E, Taylor HS (2011) Endometrial polyps affect uterine receptivity. Fertil Steril 95(8):2690–2692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.12.034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Munro MG (2019) Uterine polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 111(4):629–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shokeir TA, Shalan HM, El-Shafei MM (2004) Significance of endometrial polyps detected hysteroscopically in eumenorrheic infertile women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 30(2):84–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2003.00163.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lőrincz J, Molnár S, Jakab A, Herman T, Jashanjeet S, Török P (2019) The effect of localization and histological verification of endometrial polyps on infertility. Arch Gynecol Obstet 300(1):217–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05155-3 (Epub 2019 Apr 11. PMID: 30976969; PMCID: PMC6560005)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pérez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, Salazar F et al (2005) Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod 20(6):1632–1635. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bosteels J, Kasius J, Weyers S, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW, D’Hooghe TM (2013) Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009461.pub2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gökçe A, Şükür YE, Özmen B, Sönmezer M, Berker B, Aytaç R, Atabekoğlu CS (2021) The association between operative hysteroscopy prior to assisted reproductive technology and cervical insufficiency in second trimester. Arch Gynecol Obstet 303(5):1347–1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05863-1 (Epub 2020 Nov 20 PMID: 33219481)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim KR, Peng R, Ro JY, Robboy SJ (2004) A diagnostically useful histopathologic feature of endometrial polyp: the long axis of endometrial glands arranged parallel to surface epithelium. Am J Surg Pathol 28(8):1057–1062. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000128659.73944.f3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dahan MH, Agdi M, Shehata F, Son W, Tan SL (2014) A comparison of outcomes from in vitro fertilization cycles stimulated with either recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) or human chorionic gonadotropin acting as an LH analogue delivered as human menopausal gonadotropins, in subjects with good or poor ovarian reserve: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shalev J, Meizner I, Bar-Hava I, Dicker D, Mashiach R, Ben-Rafael Z (2000) Predictive value of transvaginal sonography performed before routine diagnostic hysteroscopy for evaluation of infertility. Fertil Steril 73(2):412–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00533-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. El-Mazny A, Abou-Salem N, El-Sherbiny W, Saber W (2011) Outpatient hysteroscopy: a routine investigation before assisted reproductive techniques? Fertil Steril 95(1):272–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bozdag G, Aksan G, Esinler I, Yarali H (2008) What is the role of office hysteroscopy in women with failed IVF cycles? Reprod Biomed Online 17(3):410–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60226-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cenksoy P, Ficicioglu C, Yıldırım G, Yesiladali M (2013) Hysteroscopic findings in women with recurrent IVF failures and the effect of correction of hysteroscopic findings on subsequent pregnancy rates. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287(2):357–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2627-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smit JG, Kasius JC, Eijkemans MJC, Koks CAM, van Golde R, Nap AW, Scheffer GJ, Manger PAP, Hoek A, Schoot BC, van Heusden AM, Kuchenbecker WKH, Perquin DAM, Fleischer K, Kaaijk EM, Sluijmer A, Friederich J, Dykgraaf RHM, van Hooff M, Louwe LA, Kwee J, de Koning CH, Janssen ICAH, Mol F, Mol BWJ, Broekmans FJM, Torrance HL (2016) Hysteroscopy before in-vitro fertilisation (inSIGHT): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387(10038):2622–2629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00231-2 (Erratum in: Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2394. PMID: 27132052)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pirtea P, De Ziegler D, Tao X et al (2021) Rate of true recurrent implantation failure is low: results of three successive frozen euploid single embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 115(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Franasiak JM, Scott RT (2017) Contribution of immunology to implantation failure of euploid embryos. Fertil Steril 107(6):1279–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.04.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

REB approval of the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) Committee: 12-382-SDR and renewal 2022-8409.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H3A 0G4, Canada

    Sofia Hussaini & Michael H. Dahan

  2. The Reproductive Care Center Clinic, and Medical Director, The Fertility Partners, Vaughan, ON, Canada

    Dan Nayot

  3. Generation Fertility Clinic, Vaughan, ON, Canada

    Michael Hartman

Authors
  1. Sofia Hussaini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dan Nayot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Hartman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael H. Dahan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Dr MD, Dr DN and Dr MH contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Dr MD and Dr SH. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Dr SH and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofia Hussaini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussaini, S., Nayot, D., Hartman, M. et al. Can endometrial thickness at baseline or maximum stimulated levels during IVF predict the presence of endometrial polyps in women with two failed embryo transfers?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307, 1645–1653 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06646-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06646-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation