Skip to main content
Log in

Uterine angiomyolipoma: a clinical analysis of 8 cases and literature review

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Uterine angiomyolipoma (AML) is a rare condition involving benign tumors composed of varying proportions of blood vessels, fat, and epithelioid or spindled smooth muscle cells. We analyzed the clinicopathological features, diagnosis and treatment methods, and prognosis of uterine AML.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical-pathological data of eight patients with pathologically diagnosed uterine AML at a single center from January 2008 to July 2020.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 50 years (range, 41–62). One patient was asymptomatic; the main clinical manifestations of the others included vaginal bleeding (3), menorrhagia (2), abdominal pain (1), and dysmenorrhea with adenomyosis (1). In one case, fat components observed via abdominal computed tomography led to a diagnosis of uterine leiomyolipoma; the rest were diagnosed as uterine leiomyoma (4), uterine fibroid degeneration (2), and pelvic mass (1). The lesions were in the body of the uterus (6), the fundus of the uterus (1), and the broad ligament (1). Seven patients had a focal soft tumor texture, and one had a tough texture; the lesions were yellow (3), yellow-white (3), and pinkish white (2). Surgeries included transabdominal myomectomy (2), transabdominal hysterectomy (2), transabdominal hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (2), and laparoscopic total hysterectomy/bilateral salpingectomy (2). The median follow-up time was 72 months. No relapses were reported.

Conclusion

Uterine AML has a low incidence rate and is most likely to occur in perimenopausal women. The clinical manifestations are similar to those of uterine leiomyomas, but AML should be suspected if the internal echo of the uterine tumor is uneven and contains adipose tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All data and material are fully available without restriction.

References

  1. Folpe AL, Kwiatkowski DJ (2010) Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms: pathology and pathogenesis. Hum Pathol 41(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2009.05.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lam H, Nijmeh J, Henske E (2017) New developments in the genetics and pathogenesis of tumours in tuberous sclerosis complex. J Pathol 241(2):219–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thway K, Fisher C (2015) PEComa: morphology and genetics of a complex tumor family. Ann Diagn Pathol 19(5):359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cil A, Haberal A, Hucumenoglu S, Kovalak E, Gunes M (2004) Angiomyolipoma of the uterus associated with tuberous sclerosis: case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 94(2):593–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulchandani NJ, Vimala R (2020) Uterine angiomyolipoma: a case report and review of literature. Indian J Gynecol Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-020-00426-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Henske E, Jóźwiak S, Kingswood J, Sampson J, Thiele E (2016) Tuberous sclerosis complex. Nature Rev Dis Prim 2:16035. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Giannella L, Delli Carpini G, Montik N, Verdecchia V, Puccio F, Di Giuseppe J, Tsiroglou D, Goteri G, Ciavattini A (2020) Ultrasound features of a uterine perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa): case report and literature review. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10080553

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen J, Ghandehari H, Parra-Herran C, Vicus D (2020) Uterine rupture: an unusual presentation of a uterine perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa). Int J Gynecol Cancer . https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Braun H, Wheelock J, Amaker B, Seeds J (2002) Sonographic evaluation of a uterine angiolipoleiomyoma. J Clin Ultrasound 30(4):241–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.10057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bennett J, Braga A, Pinto A, Van de Vijver K, Cornejo K, Pesci A, Zhang L, Morales-Oyarvide V, Kiyokawa T, Zannoni G, Carlson J, Slavik T, Tornos C, Antonescu C, Oliva E (2018) Uterine PEComas: A morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 32 tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 42(10):1370–1383. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000001119

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Conlon N, Soslow R, Murali R (2015) Perivascular epithelioid tumours (PEComas) of the gynaecological tract. J Clin Pathol 68(6):418–426. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2015-202945

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Parra-Herran C, Howitt B (2019) Uterine mesenchymal tumors: update on classification, staging, and molecular features. Surg Pathol Clin 12(2):363–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.path.2019.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawauchi S, Nawata H, Yamagata Y, Yaegashi H, Fukunaga M, Moriya T, Furuya T, Sugino N, Sasaki K (2010) Chromosomal imbalances detected by comparative genomic hybridization provide evidence that HMB-45-negative uterine angiomyolipomas belong to the PEComa family. Histopathology 56(7):974–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03567.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yaegashi H, Moriya T, Soeda S, Yonemoto Y, Nagura H, Sasano H (2001) Uterine angiomyolipoma: case report and review of the literature. Pathol Int 51(11):896–901. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1827.2001.01289.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81872125), and the local Technology and Development Key Program of Liaoning Province (No. 2019416020).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81872125), and the local Technology and Development Key Program of Liaoning Province (No. 2019416020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Jiao Wang, Qing Yang and Ningning Zhang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jiao Wang, Dandan Wang was responsible for critical revision of the manuscript and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dandan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all the patients.

Consent for publication

Informed consent to publish was obtained from all the patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Yang, Q., Zhang, N. et al. Uterine angiomyolipoma: a clinical analysis of 8 cases and literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 304, 171–177 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-05992-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-05992-1

Keywords

Navigation