Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hysterectomy versus continuing conservative management: which is better for disseminated intravascular coagulation?

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biele C, Kaufner L, Schwickert A, Nonnenmacher A, von Weizsacker K, Muallem MZ et al (2020) Conservative management of abnormally invasive placenta complicated by local hyperfibrinolysis and beginning disseminated intravascular coagulation. Arch Gynecol Obstet

  2. Matsuzaki S, Yoshino K, Endo M, Tomimatsu T, Takiuchi T, Mimura K et al (2017) Successful anticoagulant therapy for disseminated intravascular coagulation during conservative management of placenta percreta: a case report and literature review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17:443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schroder L, Potzsch B, Ruhl H, Gembruch U, Merz WM (2015) Tranexamic acid for hyperfibrinolytic hemorrhage during conservative management of placenta percreta. Obstet Gynecol 126:1012–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Romero R, Duffy TP, Berkowitz RL, Chang E, Hobbins JC (1984) Prolongation of a preterm pregnancy complicated by death of a single twin in utero and disseminated intravascular coagulation Effects of treatment with heparin. N Engl J Med. 310:772–774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsuzaki S, Grubbs BH, Matsuo K (2020) Delayed hysterectomy versus continuing conservative management for placenta percreta: which is better? Am J Obstet Gynecol 223:304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsuzaki S, Yoshino K, Endo M, Kakigano A, Takiuchi T, Kimura T (2018) Conservative management of placenta percreta. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 140:299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Licon E, Matsuzaki S, Opara KN, Machida H, Roman LD, Sasso EB et al (2020) treatment and outcome of placenta percreta: primary cesarean hysterectomy versus conservative management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 244:201–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barber JT Jr, Tressler TB, Willis GS, Martinez FJ, Peisner DB, Goodman JD et al (2011) Arteriovenous malformation identification after conservative management of placenta percreta with uterine artery embolization and adjunctive therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:e4-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank H. Abe and K. Sakiyama for administrative assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable for submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan

    Shinya Matsuzaki, Yoshikazu Nagase, Masayuki Endo & Tadashi Kimura

  2. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Shinya Matsuzaki

  3. Department of Health Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

    Masayuki Endo

Authors
  1. Shinya Matsuzaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoshikazu Nagase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masayuki Endo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tadashi Kimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SM, YN, and ME contributed to the discussion, study conception, and design. ME and TK helped in drafting the manuscript. TK conceived the study, provided general supervision, aided in drafting the manuscript, and gave final approval for the publication of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinya Matsuzaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the submitted work.

Disclosure statement

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical committee exemption

None.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsuzaki, S., Nagase, Y., Endo, M. et al. Hysterectomy versus continuing conservative management: which is better for disseminated intravascular coagulation?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 305, 537–538 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-05961-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-05961-8

Search

Navigation