Abstract
Purpose
Opioid use during labour can interfere with cardiotocography patterns. Heart rate variability indirectly reflects a fluctuation in the autonomic nervous system and can be monitored through time and spectral analyses. This experimental study aimed to evaluate the impact of nalbuphine administration on the gasometric, cardiovascular, and autonomic nervous system responses in fetal sheep.
Methods
This was an experimental study on chronically instrumented sheep fetuses (surgery at 128 ± 2 days of gestational age, term = 145 days). The model was based on a maternal intravenous bolus injection of nalbuphine, a semisynthetic opioid used as an analgesic during delivery. Fetal gasometric parameters (pH, pO2, pCO2, and lactates), hemodynamic parameters (fetal heart rate and mean arterial pressure), and autonomic nervous system tone (short-term and long-term variation, low-frequency domain, high-frequency domain, and fetal stress index) were recorded. Data obtained at 30–60 min after nalbuphine injection were compared to those recorded at baseline.
Results
Eleven experiments were performed. Fetal heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and activities at low and high frequencies were stable after injection. Short-term variation decreased at T30 min (P = 0.02), and long-term variation decreased at T60 min (P = 0.02). Fetal stress index gradually increased and reached significance at T60 min (P = 0.02). Fetal gasometric parameters and lactate levels remained stable.
Conclusion
Maternal nalbuphine use during labour may lead to fetal heart changes that are caused by the effect of opioid on the autonomic nervous system; these fluctuations do not reflect acidosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Anderson D (2011) A review of systemic opioids commonly used for labor pain relief [published correction appears in J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;56:411–8]. J Midwifery Womens Health 56:222–239
Ducloy-Bouthors AS, Keita-Meyer H, Bouvet L, Bonnin M, Morau E (2020) Accouchement normal: accompagnement de la physiologie et interventions médicales. Recommandations de la Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) avec la collaboration du Collège National des Gynécologues Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF) et du Collège National des Sages-Femmes de France (CNSF): Bien être maternel et prise en charge médicamenteuse de la douleur [Normal delivery. Guidelines of the French National Authority for Health (HAS) with the collaboration of the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) and the French College of Midwives (CNSF): Mother's wellbeing and regional or systemic analgesia for labor]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 48:891–906
Jansson LM, Velez M, McConnell K et al (2017) Maternal buprenorphine treatment and fetal neurobehavioral development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216:529.e1-529.e8
Romano M, Iuppariello L, Ponsiglione AM, Improta G, Bifulco P, Cesarelli M (2016) Frequency and time domainanalysis of foetal heart rate variability with traditional indexes:a critical survey. Comput Math Methods Med 2016:1–12
Chaffin DG, Goldberg CC, Reed KL (1991) The dimension of chaos in the fetal heart rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:1425–1429
Shaw CJ, Allison BJ, Itani N et al (2018) Altered autonomic control of heart rate variability in the chronically hypoxic fetus. J Physiol 596:6105–6119
Heart rate variability (1997) Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task force of the European society of cardiology and the North American society of pacing and electrophysiology. Eur Heart J 17:354–381
Van Laar JOEH, Porath MM, Peters CHL, Oei SG (2008) Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability for fetal surveillance: review of the literature. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:300–306
Van Laar JOEH, Peters CHL, Vullings R, Houterman S, Bergmans JWM, Oei SG (2010) Fetal autonomic response to severe acidaemia during labour. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 117:429–437
Garabedian C, Champion C, Servan-Schreiber E et al (2017) A new analysis of heart rate variability in the assessment of fetal parasympathetic activity: an experimental study in a fetal sheep model. PLoS ONE 12:e0180653
Ghesquière L, De Jonckheere J, Drumez E et al (2019) Parasympathetic nervous system response to acidosis: evaluation in an experimental fetal sheep model. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 98:433–439
Jeanne M, Logier R, De Jonckheere J, Tavernier B (2009) Heart rate variability during total intravenous anesthesia: effects of nociception and analgesia. Auton Neurosci Basic Clin 147:91–96
Giannina G, Guzman ER, Lai YL, Lake MF, Cernadas M, Vintzileos AM (1995) Comparison of the effects of meperidine and nalbuphine on intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol 86:441–445
Frasch MG, Grasch MG, Frasch MG et al (2009) Measures of acidosis with repetitive umbilical cord occlusions leading to fetal asphyxia in the near-term ovine fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(200):e1-7
Houfflin Debarge V, Bresson S, Jaillard S et al (2005) Development of a new model to investigate the fetal nociceptive pathways. Fetal Diagn Ther 20:415–419
Wassink G, Bennet L, Booth LC et al (2007) The ontogeny of hemodynamic responses to prolonged umbilical cord occlusion in fetal sheep. J Appl Physiol 103:1311–1317
Bennet L, Westgate JA, Liu Y-CJ, Wassink G, Gunn AJ (2005) Fetal acidosis and hypotension during repeated umbilical cord occlusions are associated with enhanced chemoreflex responses in near-term fetal sheep. J Appl Physiol 99:1477–1482
Garabedian C, Aubry E, Sharma D et al (2018) Exploring fetal response to acidosis in ewes: choosing an adequate experimental model. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 47:397–403
De Jonckheere J, Logier R, Dassonneville A, Delmar G, Vasseur C (2005) PhysioTrace: an efficient toolkit for biomedical signal processing. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf 7:6739–6741
Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW (1991) System 8000: computerized antenatal FHR analysis. J Perinat Med 19:47–51
Shaw CJ, Allison BJ, Itani N, Botting KJ, Niu Y, Lees CC, Giussani DA (2018) Altered autonomic control of heart rate variability in the chronically hypoxic fetus. J Physiol 596:6105–6119
Frasch MG, Müller T, Weiss C, Schwab K, Schubert H, Schwab M (2009) Heart rate variability analysis allows early asphyxia detection in ovine fetus. Reprod Sci 16:509–517
Butruille L, De Jonckheere J, Marcilly R et al (2015) Development of a pain monitoring device focused on newborn infant applications: The NeoDoloris project. IRBM 36(2):80–85
Nicolle E, Devillier P, Delanoy B, Durand C, Bessard G (1996) Therapeutic monitoring of nalbuphine: transplacental transfer and estimated pharmacokinetics in the neonate. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 49:485–489
Martin LV, Jurand A (1992) The absence of teratogenic effects of some analgesics used in anaesthesia. Additional evidence from a mouse model. Anaesthesia 47:473–476
Nezvalová-Henriksen K, Spigset O, Nordeng H (2011) Effects of codeine on pregnancy outcome: results from a large population-based cohort study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 67:1253–1261
Wilson SJ, Errick JK, Balkon J (1986) Pharmacokinetics of nalbuphine during parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:340–344
Wilson CM, McClean E, Moore J, Dundee JW (1986) A double-blind comparison of intramuscular pethidine and nalbuphine in labour. Anaesthesia 41:1207–1213
Holsey YS, Wu D, Soong Y, Omoniyi AT, Szeto HH (1999) Cardiovascular effects of a mu-selective opioid agonist (tyrosine-D-arginine-phenylalanine-lysine-NH2) in fetal sheep: sites and mechanisms of action. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:1127–1130
Sherer DM, Cooper EM, Spoor C, Serletti BL, Woods JR (1994) Resolution of marked intrapartum fetal tachycardia following intravenous nalbuphine hydrochloride. Am J Perinatol 11:367–368
Guillonneau M, Jacqz-Aigrain E, de Crepy A, Zeggout H (1990) Perinatal adverse effects of nalbuphine given during parturition. Lancet Lond Engl 335:1588
Szeto HH, Wu D, Cheng PY, Soong Y, Taylor CC, Yee J (1996) Cardiovascular and respiratory actions of U50,488H in the unanaesthetized ovine foetus. Eur J Pharmacol 297:77–82
Cohen S, Parvizi N, Mulder EJ et al (2001) Effects of morphine and naloxone on fetal heart rate and movement in the pig. J Appl Physiol 90:1577–1583
Kopecky EA, Ryan ML, Barrett JF et al (2000) Fetal response to maternally administered morphine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:424–430
Garabedian C, Clermont-Hama Y, Sharma D et al (2018) Correlation of a new index reflecting the fluctuation of parasympathetic tone and fetal acidosis in an experimental study in a sheep model. PLoS ONE 13:e0190463
Vicente-Sanchez A, Segura L, Pradhan AA (2016) The delta opioid receptor tool box. Neuroscience 338:145–159
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Editage (http://www.editage.cn) for English language editing of the manuscript.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MR: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. CG: protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. EA: protocol/project development, data collection or management. DS: protocol/project development, data collection or management. LB: data analysis. LS: protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. JDJ: protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethics approval
All animal procedures and protocols used in this study were reviewed and approved by an Institutional Ethical Committee for Experimental Research (CEEA # 2016121312148878).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Recher, M., Garabedian, C., Aubry, E. et al. Opioid effect on the autonomic nervous system in a fetal sheep model. Arch Gynecol Obstet 304, 73–80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05917-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05917-4