Skip to main content

Effect of types of placenta previa on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a 10-year retrospective cohort study

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics volume 304, pages 65–72 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Through this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of different types of placenta previa (PP) on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Methods

This study was conducted in The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and Tongji Hospital between January 2009 and 2019. PP was traditionally classified into four types, namely low-lying placenta, marginal, partial, and complete PP. Previous studies have classified PP into two types, namely low-lying placenta and PP. Based on our clinical experience, we proposed the classification of PP into three types, for the first time, which included low-lying placenta, “marpartial” (marginal and partial) PP, and complete PP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the effects of different types of PP on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Results

In total, 4490 singleton pregnancies were complicated with PP. In the four-classification method, compared with women with low-lying placenta, women with complete PP had a risk of placenta accrete spectrum disorders, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), hemorrhagic shock, severe PPH, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, puerperal infection, preterm labor, NICU admission, and low birth weight. There was no difference in maternal and neonatal outcomes between marginal and partial PP, except for increased chances of preterm labor and low birth weight in partial PP. In the two-classification method, PP was the risk factor for most of the adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, compared with low-lying placenta.

Conclusion

Complete PP and low-lying placenta were associated with the highest and lowest risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes, respectively, whereas clinically similar outcomes were observed between marginal and partial PP. The three-classification of PP may be practical from the clinical perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PP:

Placenta previa

PAS:

Placenta accrete spectrum

PPH:

Postpartum hemorrhage

ICU:

Intensive care unit

NICU:

Neonatal intensive care unit

AIUM:

American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

CI:

Confidence interval

aOR:

Adjusted odds ratios

ART:

Assisted reproductive technology

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

References

  1. Faiz AS, Ananth CV (2003) Etiology and risk factors for placenta previa: an overview and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 13:175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/jmf.13.3.175.190

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG, Belfort MA, Burton GJ, Collins SL, Dornan S, Jurkovic D, Kayem G, Kingdom J, Silver R, Sentilhes L, Royal College of O, Gynaecologists (2019) Placenta praevia and placenta accreta: diagnosis and management: green-top guideline No. 27a. BJOG 126:e1–e48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roustaei Z, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Tuomainen TP, Lamminpaa R, Heinonen S (2018) The effect of advanced maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes of placenta previa: a register-based cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 227:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.05.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu SCH, Cheng YKY, Tse WT, Sahota DS, Chung MY, Wong SSM, Chan OK, Leung TY (2020) Perioperative prophylactic internal iliac artery balloon occlusion in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in placenta previa: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.024

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumfeld Y, Herskovitz R, Niv ZB, Mastrolia SA, Weintraub AY (2017) Placenta associated pregnancy complications in pregnancies complicated with placenta previa. Taiwan J Obstetr Gynecol 56:331–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2017.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsuji M, Shibata E, Askew DJ et al (2019) Associations between metal concentrations in whole blood and placenta previa and placenta accreta: the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). Environ Health Prev Med 24:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-019-0795-7

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Walfisch A, Beharier O, Shoham-Vardi I, Sergienko R, Landau D, Sheiner E (2016) Placenta previa and long-term morbidity of the term offspring. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 203:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oyelese Y, Smulian JC (2006) Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 107:927–941. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000235893.09300.b7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garofalo A, Pilloni E, Alemanno MG, Garofalo G, Sciarrone A, Todros T, Viora E (2019) Ultrasound accuracy in prenatal diagnosis of abnormal placentation of posterior placenta previa. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 242:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.09.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, Saade GR, Invited FIW, P, (2014) Fetal imaging: executive summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging Workshop. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210:387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG, Burton GJ, Collins SL, Silver R, Royal College of O, Gynaecologists (2019) Vasa praevia: diagnosis and management: green-top guideline no. 27b. BJOG 126:e49–e61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tuzovic L (2006a) Complete versus incomplete placenta previa and obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 93:110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.02.006

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baba Y, Takahashi H, Ohkuchi A, Usui R, Matsubara S (2016) Which type of placenta previa requires blood transfusion more frequently? A new concept of indiscernible edge total previa. J Obstetr Gynaecol Res 42:1502–1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dola CP, Garite TJ, Dowling DD et al (2003) Placenta previa: does its type affect pregnancy outcome? Am J Perinatol 20:353–360. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-45282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Quant HS, Friedman AM, Wang E, Parry S, Schwartz N (2014) Transabdominal ultrasonography as a screening test for second-trimester placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 123:628–633. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jauniaux E, Ayres-de-Campos D, Langhoff-Roos J, Fox KA, Collins S, Diagnosis FPA, Management Expert Consensus P (2019) FIGO classification for the clinical diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 146:20–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lier H, Bernhard M, Hossfeld B (2018) Hypovolemic and hemorrhagic shock. Anaesthesist 67:225–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-018-0411-z

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gluck O, Mizrachi Y, Bar J, Barda G (2018) The impact of advanced maternal age on the outcome of twin pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297:891–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4656-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Feng Y, Li X-Y, Xiao J et al (2018) Risk factors and pregnancy outcomes: complete versus incomplete placenta previa in mid-pregnancy. Curr Med Sci 38:597–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-018-1919-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma L-k, Han N, Yang J-q, Bian X-m, Liu J-t (2012) Clinical analysis of placenta previa complicated with previous caesarean section. Chin Med Sci J 27:129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-9294(14)60044-4

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tuzovic L (2006b) Complete versus incomplete placenta previa and obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstetr Off Organ Int Feder Gynaecol Obstetr 93:110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.02.006

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Daskalakis G, Simou M, Zacharakis D, Detorakis S, Akrivos N, Papantoniou N, Fouskakis D, Antsaklis A (2011) Impact of placenta previa on obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstetr Off Organ Int Feder Gynaecol Obstetr 114:238–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gorodeski IG, Bahari CM (1987) The effect of placenta previa localization upon maternal and fetal-neonatal outcome. J Perinat Med 15:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpme.1987.15.2.169

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oppenheimer LW, Farine D, Ritchie JWK, Lewinsky RM, Telford J, Fairbanks LA (1991) What is a low-lying placenta? Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:1036–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(91)90465-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dashe JS, Dd Fau M, Ramus RM, Rm Fau R, Santos-Ramos R, Fau SRR, Twickler DM, Twickler DM (2002) Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection. Obstet Gynecol 99:692–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)01935-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2016YFC1000405, 2017YFC1001402, 2018YFC1004104, and 2018YFC10029002), Guangzhou clinical high-tech, major characteristic technology project - treatment optimization of placental percreta disease diagnosed based on 3D technology and the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 81830045, 81671533, 81971415, and 82071652).

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2016YFC1000405, 2017YFC1001402, 2018YFC1004104, and 2018YFC10029002), Guangzhou clinical high-tech, major characteristic technology project - treatment optimization of placental percreta disease diagnosed based on 3D technology and the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 81830045, 81671533, 81971415, and 82071652). The funding sources had no influence on the content of the study.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lizi Zhang, Shilei Bi, and Zhijian Wang contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China

    Shilei Bi, Jingsi Chen, Jingman Tang, Jingjin Gong, Sushan Xie, Lin Lin, Luwen Ren, Shanshan Zeng, Lijun Huang, Lili Du & Dunjin Chen

  2. Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China

    Jingsi Chen, Lili Du & Dunjin Chen

  3. Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China

    Jingsi Chen, Lili Du & Dunjin Chen

  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China

    Lizi Zhang & Zhijian Wang

  5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China

    Shaoshuai Wang

Authors
  1. Shilei Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lizi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhijian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jingsi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jingman Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jingjin Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sushan Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lin Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Luwen Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shanshan Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lijun Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Shaoshuai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Lili Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Dunjin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LZ, SB, and ZW contributed to the study design, data analysis, and manuscript writing and revision. JC, JT, JG, SX, and LL contributed to the data analysis and manuscript revision. LR, SZ, and LH contributed to data collection and management, SW, LD, and DC contributed to the manuscript revision and project development. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dunjin Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bi, S., Zhang, L., Wang, Z. et al. Effect of types of placenta previa on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a 10-year retrospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 304, 65–72 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05912-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05912-9

Keywords

  • Previa placenta
  • Classification
  • Ultrasound
  • Maternal outcome
  • Neonatal outcome