Skip to main content
Log in

The association between the number of vaginal examinations during labor and perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study the association between the number of vaginal examinations (VEs) performed during labor and subsequent severe perineal trauma.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study. We included all women admitted to the delivery ward between 2008 and 2017, in active labor. Exclusion criteria included preterm deliveries (< 37 weeks), Cesarean deliveries and episiotomy during delivery.

The primary outcome, severe perineal trauma, was defined as perineal tears grades 3–4.

The cohort was divided into 4 groups, based on the number of VEs performed during labor: Group 1—up to two VEs (n = 4588), Group 2—three to four VEs (n = 5815), Group 3—five to six VEs (n = 4687), and Group 4—seven or more VEs (n = 7297).

Results

Overall, 22,387 women were included in the study. The rate of severe perineal trauma in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 was 0.4%, 0.1%, 0.8%, and 0.4%, respectively (p < 0.001).

Performing five or more VEs during labor was associated with a higher risk of severe perineal trauma (0.26% vs. 0.53%, p < 0.01), as compared to four VEs or less.

Using a logistic regression model, we found that performing five or more VEs during labor (aOR = 1.72 CI 95% (1.21–2.47), p < 0.001) or performing an instrumental delivery (aOR = 2.65 CI 95% (1.72–4.07), p < 0.001) were directly associated with the risk for severe perineal trauma. Applying epidural anesthesia showed an inverse association with severe perineal trauma (aOR = 0.54 CI 95% (0.38–0.77), p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Performing five or more VEs during active labor is associated with an increased risk for severe perineal trauma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Downe S, Gyte GM, Dahlen HG, Singata M (2013) Routine vaginal examinations for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010088.pub2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Borders N, Lawton R, Martin SR (2012) A clinical audit of the number of vaginal examinations in labor: A NOVEL Idea. J Midwifery Womens Health 57:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00128.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Newton ER (1993) Chorioamnionitis and intraamniotic infection. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:795–808

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibbs RS, Duff P (1991) Progress in pathogenesis and management of clinical intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164:1317–1326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Duff P. Maternal and Perinatal Infection — Bacterial. Seventh Ed. Elsevier Inc.; 2012. 10.1016/B978-1-4377-1935-2.00051-X

  6. (UK) NCC for W and CH. Normal labour: first stage 2007

  7. de Klerk HW, Boere E, van Lunsen RH, Bakker JJH (2018) Women’s experiences with vaginal examinations during labor in the Netherlands. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 39:90–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2017.1291623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. 2018

  9. Shepherd A, Cheyne H (2013) The frequency and reasons for vaginal examinations in labour. Women Birth 26:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2012.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Soper DE, Glen Mayhall C, Dalton HP (1989) Risk factors for intraamniotic infection: A prospective epidemiologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:562–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(89)90356-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aasheim V, Nilsen ABV, Reinar LM, Lukasse M (2017) Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Update I (2018) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery. Obstet Gynecol 132:e87–102. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002841

  13. Ginath S, Mizrachi Y, Bar J, Condrea A, Kovo M (2017) Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) in Israel: a review of the incidence and risk factors. Rambam Maimonides Med J 8:e0018. https://doi.org/10.5041/rmmj.10295

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H, Berridge G, Winter C, Sames L et al (1998) A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:1262–1272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pergialiotis V, Vlachos D, Protopapas A, Pappa K, Vlachos G (2014) Risk factors for severe perineal lacerations during childbirth. Int J Gynecol Obstet 125:6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.09.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams A, Herron-Marx SCH (2002) Lower genital tract and anal sphincter trauma. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 16:99–115. https://doi.org/10.1053/beog.2002.0258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Landy HJ, Laughon SK, Bailit JL, Kominiarek MA, Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Ramirez M et al (2011) Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 117:627–635. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820afaf2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Steiner N, Weintraub AY, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, Sheiner E (2012) Episiotomy: The final cut? Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:1369–1373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zilberman A, Sheiner E, Barrett O, Hamou B, Silberstein T (2018) Once episiotomy, always episiotomy? Arch Gynecol Obstet 298:121–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4783-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Schaub AF, Litschgi M, Hoesli I, Holzgreve W, Bleul U, Geissbühler V (2008) Obstetric gel shortens second stage of labor and prevents perineal trauma in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial on labor facilitation. J Perinat Med 36:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2008.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Beckmann MM, Garrett AJ (2006) Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. In: Beckmann MM, (eds) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 10.1002/14651858.CD005123.pub2

  22. Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW (2006) Occult anal sphincter injuries-myth or reality? BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 113:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00799.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthy weight, overweight, and obesity among U.S. adults Defining healthy weight, overweight, and obesity in adults. 2000

Download references

Acknowledgements

Meir Azran, Computing and Information Systems, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel. Ela Smirin, archive, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel. Performing five or more VEs during active labor is associated with an increased risk for severe perineal trauma.

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

O. Gluck and E. Weiner: Project development and manuscript writing. H. Ganer Herman and O. Tal: Data collection and management. E. Grinstein: Data analysis and manuscript editing. J. Bar and M. Kovo: Literature review and concept development. S. Ginath: Manuscript editing and protocol development.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ohad Gluck.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gluck, O., Ganer Herman, H., Tal, O. et al. The association between the number of vaginal examinations during labor and perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 301, 1405–1410 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05552-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05552-z

Keywords

Navigation