Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prognostic value of serum HE4 in patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In this study, the prognostic value of serum HE4 was investigated in patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma.

Methods

Serum HE4 and CA125 levels were measured in both patients and controls, and the response of treatment and the detection of recurrence were evaluated by serum HE4 and CA125 levels in the patients.

Results

The results showed that the levels of serum HE4 and CA125 were significantly higher in advanced patients than those seen in benign disease controls (p < 0.001). Compared with CA125, HE4 had higher specificity, but lower sensitivity. Furthermore, serum HE4 was closely associated with the response of treatment and recurrence, the effective response rate for therapy treatment showed by HE4 was higher than CA125, and a serum HE4 level was correlated with a sensitivity of 82.8% and a specificity of 99%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.7%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 77.9% to show the presence of recurrence; the accuracy of HE4 for recurrence prediction after treatment was 88.6%.

Conclusions

Our study indicated that serum HE4 levels are effective for diagnosis, evaluating the response of treatment and predicting recurrence in patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59:225–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitra R, Chen X, Greenawalt EJ, Maulik U, Jiang W, Zhao Z et al (2017) Decoding critical long non-coding RNA in ovarian cancer epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Nat Commun 8:1604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T et al (2008) Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58:71–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Levanon K, Crum C, Drapkin R (2008) New insights into the pathogenesis of serous ovarian cancer and its clinical impact. J Clin Oncol 26:5284–5293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson JW, Miron A, Jarboe EA, Parast MM, Hirsch MS, Lee Y et al (2008) Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: its potential role in primary peritoneal serous carcinoma and serous cancer prevention. J Clin Oncol 26:4160–4165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kindelberger DW, Lee Y, Miron A, Hirsch MS, Feltmate C, Medeiros F et al (2007) Intraepithelial carcinoma of the fimbria and pelvic serous carcinoma: evidence for a causal relationship. Am J Surg Pathol 31:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubeau L, Drapkin R (2013) Coming into focus: the nonovarian origins of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 24:28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fader AN, Rose PG (2007) Role of surgery in ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 25:2873–2883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gu P, Pan LL, Wu SQ, Sun L, Huang G (2009) CA 125, PET alone, PET-CT, CT and MRI in diagnosing recurrent ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 71:164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Levy T, Weiser R, Boaz M, Ben Shem E, Golan A, Menczer J (2013) The significance of the pattern of serum CA125 level ascent to above the normal range in epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal and tubal carcinoma patients. Gynecol Oncol 129:165–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miralles C, Orea M, Espana P, Provencio M, Sánchez A, Cantos B et al (2003) Cancer antigen 125 associated with multiple benign and malignant pathologies. Ann Surg Oncol 10:150–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Havrilesky LJ, Whitehead CM, Rubatt JM, Cheek RL, Groelke J, He Q et al (2008) Evaluation of biomarker panels for early stage ovarian cancer detection and monitoring for disease recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 110:374–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Karlsen MA, Sandhu N, Høgdall C, Christensen IJ, Nedergaard L, Lundvall L et al (2012) Evaluation of HE4, CA125, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) and risk of malignancy index (RMI) as diagnostic tools of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol 127:379–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Scaletta G, Plotti F, Luvero D, Capriglione S, Montera R, Miranda A et al (2017) The role of novel biomarker HE4 in the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 17:827–839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Knific T, Osredkar J, Smrkolj Š, Tonin I, Vouk K, Blejec A et al (2017) Novel algorithm including CA-125, HE4 and body mass index in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 147:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Qu W, Gao Q, Chen H, Tang Z, Zhu X, Jiang SW (2017) HE4-test of urine and body fluids for diagnosis of gynecologic cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 17:239–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mi D, Zhang YX, Wang CJ, Feng Q, Qi P, Chen SQ (2016) Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum human epididymis protein 4 in patients with primary fallopian tube carcinoma. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 42:1326–1335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mi D, Zhang Y (2018) Diagnostic and prognostic value of HE4 in female patients with primary peritoneal carcinoma. Int J Bio Markers 33:395–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rustin GJ, Vergote I, Eisenhauer E, Pujade-Lauraine E, Quinn M, Thigpen T et al (2011) Definitions for response and progression in ovarian cancer clinical trials incorporating RECIST 11 and CA 125 agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:419–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Romagnolo C, Leon AE, Fabricio AS, Taborelli M, Polesel J, Del Pup L et al (2016) HE4, CA125 and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) as diagnostic tools for ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass: an Italian multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol 141:303–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chudecka-Głaz A, Rzepka-Go´rska I, Wojciechowska I (2012) Human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) is a novel biomarker and promising prognostic factor in ovarian cancer patients. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 33:382–390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Capriglione S, Luvero D, Plotti F, Terranova C, Montera R, Scaletta G (2017) Ovarian cancer recurrence and early detection: may HE4 play a key role in this open challenge? A systematic review of literature. Med Oncol 34:164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vallius T, Hynninen J, Auranen A, Carpen O, Matomaki J, Oksa S et al (2014) Serum HE4 and CA 125 as predictors of response and outcome during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Tumor Biol 35:12389–12395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferraro S, Robbiano C, Tosca N, Panzeri A, Paganoni AM, Panteghini M (2018) Serum human epididymis protein 4 vs carbohydrate antigen 125 in ovarian cancer follow-up. Clin biochem 60:84–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Manganaro L, Michienzi S, Vinci V, Falzarano R, Saldari M, Granato T et al (2013) Serum HE4 levels combined with CE CT imaging improve the management of monitoring women affected by epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep 30:2481–2487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Trudel D, Tetu B, Gregoire J, Plante M, Renaud MC, Bacharov D et al (2012) Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and ovarian cancer prognosis. Gynecol Oncol 127:511–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Steffensen KD, Waldstrom M, Brandslund I, Petzold M, Jakobsen A (2012) The prognostic and predictive value of combined HE4 and CA 125 in ovarian cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22:1474–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Braicu EI, Chekerov R, Richter R, Pop C, Nassir M, Loefgren H et al (2014) HE4 expression in plasma correlates with surgical outcome and overall survival in patients with first ovarian cancer relapse. Ann Surg Oncol 21:955–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Steffensen KD, Waldstrøm M, Brandslund I, Lund B, Sørensen SM, Petzold M et al (2016) Identification of high-risk patients by human epididymis protein 4 levels during follow-up of ovarian cancer. Oncol Lett 11:3967–3974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang Z, Luo Z, Zhang W, Zhang J, Li Z, Li L (2013) Diagnosis and preoperative value of serum HE4 concentrations for optimal debulking in epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Lett 6:28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank the women participated in our study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, No. 156, Nankai Three Road, Tianjin, China

    Dong Mi & Yuexiang Zhang

Authors
  1. Dong Mi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuexiang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.Mi: project design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing. Y.Z: data collection. All authors read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Mi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mi, D., Zhang, Y. Prognostic value of serum HE4 in patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 301, 779–785 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05447-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05447-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation