Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feasibility of a large multi-center translational research project for newly diagnosed breast and ovarian cancer patients with affiliated biobank: the BRandO biology and outcome (BiO)-project

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Large translational research projects may contribute to further progress in cancer treatment by exploring molecular biology, immunologic approaches and identification of new prognostic and predictive factors. Therefore, the BRandOBio-project combines a clinical registry for collection of patient and tumor characteristics with a biobank comprising tumor and liquid biopsies. In addition, sociodemographic, environmental and lifestyle factors of included patients with primary newly diagnosed breast or ovarian cancer, other rare malignant ovarian tumors or gestational trophoblastic disease are prospectively collected.

Methods

The target population includes the German “Alb-Allgäu-Bodensee Region” which constitutes the outreach area of the University Hospital Ulm with affiliated academic centers and private practices. Clinical data combined with primary tumor tissue samples and longitudinal repeatedly collected blood samples [before, 6 (in high-risk situations), 12, 36 and 60 months after treatment and at relapse] will be acquired from more than 4000 patients within the next years. Standardized questionnaires are given to patients of the University Hospital Ulm and eight selected external sites for assessing life style and cancer risk factors. Concomitantly, storage of paraffin-embedded tumor samples as well as liquid biopsy samples will allow translational research projects, for example in terms of investigating circulating DNA and germ line DNA from cell pellets.

Results

Starting in January 2016 at the University Hospital Ulm, 19 additional external sites started recruiting patients in March 2017. As of September 15th 2019, 2151 patients with newly diagnosed cancers could be recruited (2044 breast cancer; 107 ovarian cancer). Nearly all patients provided biological samples (tumor and liquid biopsy) and about 80% returned the standardized questionnaire. After 1 year follow-up, blood samples were available from more than 80% of the participating patients.

Conclusions

The BRandO BIO study is a large prospective cohort study with integrated comprehensive biobank and evaluation of sociodemographic and life style factors of gynecological cancer patients in a well-defined geographical area in the South West of Germany. Continuous high patient recruitment and stable rates over 80% for returned questionnaires as well as for repeated blood sampling show high acceptance of the BRandO study program and confirms feasibility of the project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harter P, Muallem ZM, Buhrmann C et al (2011) Impact of a structured quality management program on surgical outcome in primary advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 121(3):615–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Gostout BS et al (2009) Quality improvement in the surgical approach to advanced ovarian cancer: the mayo clinic experience. J Am Coll Surg 208(4):614–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harter P, Hauke J, Heitz F et al (2017) Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including BRCA1/2 in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1). PLoS ONE 12(10):e0186043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Robert Koch-Institut. Zentrum Für Krebsregisterdaten—Brustkrebs (2014) https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Krebsarten/Brustkrebs/brustkrebs_node.html. Accessed 2 Apr 2018

  5. Eiro N, Gonzalez LO, Fraile M, Cid S, Schneider J, Vizoso FJ (2019) Breast cancer tumor stroma: cellular components, phenotypic heterogeneity, intercellular communication, prognostic implications and therapeutic opportunities. Cancers (Basel) 11(5):664. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11050664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore K, Colombo N, Scambia G et al (2018) Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 379(26):2495–2505. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1810858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Litton JK, Rugo HS, Ettl J et al (2018) Talazoparib in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med 379(8):753–763. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1802905

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robson M, Im S-A, Senkus E et al (2017) Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med 377(6):523–533. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1706450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harter P, Johnson T, Berton-Rigaud D et al (2016) BRCA1/2 mutations associated with progression-free survival in ovarian cancer patients in the AGO-OVAR 16 study. Gynecol Oncol 140(3):443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406(6797):747–752. https://doi.org/10.1038/35021093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liedtke C, Jackisch C, Thill M et al (2018) AGO recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with early breast cancer: update 2018. Breast Care 13(3):196–208. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489329

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. André F, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G et al (2019) Alpelisib for PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 380(20):1929–1940. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1813904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Key TJ, Verkasalo PK, Banks E (2001) Epidemiology of breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2(3):133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00254-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kessel KA, Vogel MME, Kessel C et al (2018) Cancer clinical trials—survey evaluating patient participation and acceptance in a university-based comprehensive cancer center (CCC). Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 13:44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2018.10.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Moorcraft SY, Marriott C, Peckitt C et al (2016) Patients’ willingness to participate in clinical trials and their views on aspects of cancer research: results of a prospective patient survey. Trials 17(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1105-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients for participating in this study and donating their blood samples for research purposes.

Funding

External funding was provided by Celgene.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AdG: protocol/project development, data collection and management, manuscript writing; GN: project development, data collection, manuscript writing; PM: project development, data management; AR, ES, SF, FF, TK, FT, RF, FE, NdG, WJ: data collection; TWPF: project development, data management; LW: project development, sample and data management, manuscript editing; PK: data management, manuscript design; MS: data management, manuscript writing; DR: data management, manuscript editing; JH: protocol/project development, data collection and management, manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amelie De Gregorio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

JH: Celgene. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Study protocol and patient informed consent have been approved by the local ethic committee and are in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Variable

Part of the required cancer documentation report

Date of birth

×

Gender

×

Date of death

×

Death caused by cancer

×

Primary tumor ICD-code

×

Primary tumor ICD-version

×

Primary tumor topography ICD-O

×

Primary tumor topography ICD-O-version

×

Tumor date of diagnosis

×

Tumor localisation (left/right)

×

Previous history of cancer

×

Menopausal status

×

Height (at time of first diagnosis)

 

Weight (at time of first diagnosis)

 

Localisation of distant metastases (primary)

×

Date of histological confirmation of distant metastases

×

Histology date

×

Histology internal registration number

 

Responsible Pathological Institute

 

Morphology-code

×

Morphology ICD-O-version

×

Grading

×

TNM_VERSION

×

TNM T-category

×

TNM N-category

×

TNM M-category

×

TNM L-category

×

TNM V-category

×

R-status

×

Number of removed lymph nodes

×

Number of positive lymph nodes

×

Number of removed sentinel lymph nodes

×

Number of positive sentinel lymph nodes

×

ER-IRS

×

ER—%

 

PgR-IRS

×

PgR—%

 

Her2Neu-score

×

FISH

 

Ki67

 

Invasive tumor size

×

DCIS tumor size

×

Date of surgery

×

OPS-code

×

OPS-version

×

Intention of surgery (curative, palliative, etc.)

×

Intention of radiotherapy

×

Start date of radiotherapy

×

Stop date of radiotherapy

×

Localization of radiotherapy (e.g., breast, chest wall)

×

With/without lymph node region

×

Side of radiotherapy (left/right)

×

Intention of systemic therapy

×

Type of systemic therapy

×

Start date of systemic therapy

×

Stop date of systemic therapy

×

Treatment protocol for systemic therapy

×

Systemic therapy agents

×

Date of assessment of current tumor status

×

Current tumor status

×

Current status primary tumor

×

Current status lymph nodes

×

Current status distant metastases

×

Localisation of distant metastases

×

Date of histological confirmation of distant metastases

×

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Gregorio, A., Nagel, G., Möller, P. et al. Feasibility of a large multi-center translational research project for newly diagnosed breast and ovarian cancer patients with affiliated biobank: the BRandO biology and outcome (BiO)-project. Arch Gynecol Obstet 301, 273–281 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05395-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05395-3

Keywords

Navigation