Cesarean section and the risk of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis
- 41 Downloads
To explore the association between cesarean section (CS) and the risk of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov database for studies related to the association between CS and the risk of neonatal RDS up to 25 August 2018. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model (REM).
A total of 26 studies from 25 available articles were included in this meta-analysis. For the association between CS and the risk of neonatal RDS, the pooled OR was 1.76 (95% CI 1.48–2.09). The pooled OR of the risk of neonatal RDS was 2.38 (95% CI 1.89–2.99) for elective CS and 1.85 (95% CI 1.34–2.56) for emergency CS.
This meta-analysis suggested that CS, elective CS, and emergency CS were associated with an increased risk of neonatal RDS.
KeywordsCesarean section Epidemiology studies Meta-analysis Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
YL: conceived the study, designed the study, drafted the manuscript, carried out the literature search and data extraction, interpreted the result of the analysis, and reviewed and revised the manuscript critically. CZ: carried out the literature search and data extraction, interpreted the result of the analysis, and reviewed and revised the manuscript critically. DZ: conceived the study, designed the study, drafted the manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript critically. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.De Luca D, van Kaam AH, Tingay DG, Courtney SE, Danhaive O, Carnielli VP, Zimmermann LJ, Kneyber MCJ, Tissieres P, Brierley J, Conti G, Pillow JJ, Rimensberger PC (2017) The Montreux definition of neonatal ARDS: biological and clinical background behind the description of a new entity. Lancet Respir Med 5:657–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Hermansen CL, Mahajan A (2015) Newborn respiratory distress. Am Fam Phys 92:994Google Scholar
- 4.Lewis S (1968) A follow-up study of the respiratory distress syndrome. Proc R Soc Med 61:771–773Google Scholar
- 16.Morley GM (2001) Mode of delivery and risk od respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol 97:439–442Google Scholar
- 28.Sangkomkamhang U, Pattanittum P, Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P (2011) Mode of delivery and outcomes in preterm births. J Med Assoc Thail 94: 415–420.Google Scholar
- 30.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Chin Integr Med 18:e123Google Scholar
- 41.Badran EF, Abdalgani MM, Al-Lawama MA, Al-Ammouri IA, Basha AS, Al Kazaleh FA, Saleh SS, Al-Katib FA, Khader YS (2012) Effects of perinatal risk factors on common neonatal respiratory morbidities beyond 36 weeks of gestation. Saudi Med J 33:1317–1323Google Scholar
- 43.Kreitchmann R, Cohen RA, Stoszek SK, Pinto JA, Losso M, Pierre R, Alarcon J, Succi R, Szyld E, Abreu T, Read JS (2011) Mode of delivery and neonatal respiratory morbidity among HIV-exposed newborns in Latin America and the Caribbean: NISDI Perinatal-LILAC Studies. Int J Gynecol Obstet 114:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar