Comparison of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with intraoperative findings in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) by means of the ENZIAN score.
This retrospective two-center study includes 63 patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis, who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2016 at both the University Hospital of Zurich and the Cantonal Hospital of Schaffhausen. Inclusion criteria were a preoperative pelvic MRI and intraoperative or bioptic confirmation of DIE. The preoperative MRI findings were compared with the intraoperative results by means of the ENZIAN score. Furthermore, the various MRI sequences were analyzed for their diagnostic value based on a Likert scale.
Sensitivity and negative predictive values of MRI confirmed by surgery were 95.2% and 91.7% (lesions in the vaginal/rectovaginal space), 78.4% and 56% (uterosacral ligaments), 91.4% and 89.7% (rectum/sigmoid colon), 57.1% and 94.1% (myometrium), 85.7% and 98.3% (bladder), and 73.3% and 92.2% (intestine), respectively. T2 axial and sagittal MRI sequences in combination with a T1 sequence were diagnostically sufficient.
The MRI-based ENZIAN score correlates well with the intraoperative findings, enabling a better planning of the surgical procedure for patients and physicians. However, considerable difficulty and a poorer comparability result from the variations in sequences used in the detection of this multifaceted disease. Therefore, a standardization of MRI protocols used in the detection of DIE will be a crucial step towards increased diagnostic validity and the ENZIAN score may be used as an anatomical land map and valuable communication tool between radiologists and gynecologists.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Giudice LC, Kao LC (2004) Endometriosis. Lancet. 364(9447):1789–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5
Burney RO, Giudice LC (2012) Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 98(3):511–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.029
Meuleman C, Vandenabeele B, Fieuws S, Spiessens C, Timmerman D, D'Hooghe T (2009) High prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women with normal ovulation and normospermic partners. Fertil Steril. 92(1):68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.056
Nnoaham KE, Hummelshoj L, Webster P, d'Hooghe T, de Cicco Nardone F, de Cicco Nardone C et al (2011) Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil Steril. 96(2):366–73.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.090
Chapron C, Dubuisson JB, Pansini V, Vieira M, Fauconnier A, Barakat H et al (2002) Routine clinical examination is not sufficient for diagnosing and locating deeply infiltrating endometriosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9(2):115–119.
Gauche Cazalis C, Koskas M, Martin B, Palazzo L, Madelenat P, Yazbeck C (2012) Preoperative imaging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. In: Transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 40(11), 634–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.09.014
Fraser MA, Agarwal S, Chen I, Singh SS (2015) Routine vs expert-guided transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a retrospective review. Abdom Imaging 40(3):587–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0243-5
Piessens S, Healey M, Maher P, Tsaltas J, Rombauts L (2014) Can anyone screen for deep infiltrating endometriosis with transvaginal ultrasound? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 54(5):462–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12242
Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PM, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Hull ML (2016) Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD009591. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858-CD009591-pub2
Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C, Kinkel K, Cunha TM, Guerra A et al (2016) European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z
Custódio Silva MP, Trovó de Marqui AB (1997) Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis 1996. Fertil Steril 67(5):817–821
Johnson NP, Hummelshoj L, Adamson GD, Keckstein J, Taylor HS, Abrao MS et al (2017) World endometriosis society consensus on the classification of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 32(2):315–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew293
Haas D, Wurm P, Shamiyeh A, Shebl O, Chvatal R, Oppelt P (2013) Efficacy of the revised Enzian classification: a retrospective analysis: Does the revised Enzian classification solve the problem of duplicate classification in rASRM and Enzian? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 287(5):941–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2647-1
Tuttlies F, Keckstein J, Ulrich U, Possover M, Schweppe KW, Wustlich M et al (2005) ENZIAN-score, a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Zentralbl Gynakol 127(5):275–281. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-836904
Haas D, Shebl O, Shamiyeh A, Oppelt P (2013) The rASRM score and the Enzian classification for endometriosis: their strengths and weaknesses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 92(1):3–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12026
Chamié LP, Blasbalg R, Gonçalves MO, Carvalho FM, Abrão MS, de Oliveira IS (2009) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and preoperative assessment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 106(3):198–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.04.013
Ito TE, Abi Khalil ED, Taffel M, Moawad GN (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging correlation to intraoperative findings of deeply infiltrative endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 107(2):e11–e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.024
Saba L, Sulcis R, Melis GB, Ibba G, Alcazar JL, Piga M et al (2014) Diagnostic confidence analysis in the magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian and deep endometriosis: comparison with surgical results. Eur Radiol. 24(2):335–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-3013-9
Haas D, Chvatal R, Habelsberger A, Schimetta W, Wayand W, Shamiyeh A et al (2013) Preoperative planning of surgery for deeply infiltrating endometriosis using the ENZIAN classification. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 166(1):99–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.012
Foti PV, Farina R, Palmucci S, Vizzini IAA, Libertini N, Coronella M et al (2018) Endometriosis: clinical features, MR imaging findings and pathologic correlation. Insights Imaging. 9(2):149–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0591-0
Schneider C, Oehmke F, Tinneberg HR, Krombach GA (2016) MRI technique for the preoperative evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: current status and protocol recommendation. Clin Radiol. 71(3):179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2015.09.014
Bis KG, Vrachliotis TG, Agrawal R, Shetty AN, Maximovich A, Hricak H (1997) Pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging spectrum with laparoscopic correlation and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics. 17(3):639–655. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.17.3.9153703
Jarlot C, Anglade E, Paillocher N, Moreau D, Catala L, Aubé C (2008) MR imaging features of deep pelvic endometriosis: correlation with laparoscopy. J Radiol. 89(11 Pt 1):1745–1754
Di Paola V, Manfredi R, Castelli F, Negrelli R, Mehrabi S, Pozzi Mucelli R (2015) Detection and localization of deep endometriosis by means of MRI and correlation with the ENZIAN score. Eur J Radiol. 84(4):568–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.017
Zanardi R, Del Frate C, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M (2003) Staging of pelvic endometriosis based on MRI findings versus laparoscopic classification according to the American Fertility Society. Abdom Imaging. 28(5):733–742
Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Mezzetti TP (2001) Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 21(1):193–216. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.21.1.g01ja14193
The authors thank Burkhardt Seifert for statistical consulting.
Conflict of interest
The author Laurin Burla declares that he has no conflict of interest. The author David Scheiner declares that he has no conflict of interest. The author Eleftherios Pierre Samartzis declares that he has no conflict of interest. The author Stefan Seidel declares that he has no conflict of interest. The author Markus Eberhard declares that he has no conflict of interest. The author Daniel Fink declares that he has no conflict of interest. The author Andreas Boss declares that he has no conflict of interest. The author Patrick Imesch declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved prior to its initiation by the cantonal ethics committee of Zurich (2016–00613).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Burla, L., Scheiner, D., Samartzis, E.P. et al. The ENZIAN score as a preoperative MRI-based classification instrument for deep infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 300, 109–116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05157-1
- Preoperative planning in deep infiltrating endometriosis
- Deep infiltrating endometriosis
- ENZIAN score