Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modified cesarean hysterectomy technique for management of cases of placenta increta and percreta at a tertiary referral hospital in Egypt

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of a modified type II radical hysterectomy on maternal morbidities and mortality in cases with abnormally invasive placenta (AIP).

Methods

63 cases with AIP were managed at one of the largest referral centers in Egypt in a prospective study design. This technique entails devascularization of the uterus laterally on both sides and to clamp the uterus at the lowest possible point just below the level of the placenta while sparing the ureters.

Results

The difference between pre- and post-operative hemoglobin was only about 1 gm/dl, and the mean blood loss was 1673 ± 958 ml. There was a significant drop in the post-operative need for blood and blood product replacement, packed red blood cells (p = 0.013), fresh red blood cells (p < 0.001), and plasma units (p = 0.012). Operative time (skin to skin) averaged 190 ± 58.2 min as the technique is slow and utilizes meticulous hemostatic steps. ICU admission was 4.8% with a mean total hospital stay of 8.6 ± 3.6 days. Histopathological examination revealed 58 cases of placenta increta and five percreta cases. We also had 16 bladder injuries (25.4%) and two ureteric injuries, and no maternal mortalities.

Conclusion

This technique reduces maternal morbidity and mortality while performing cesarean hysterectomy for cases with AIP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: i
Fig. 2: i
Fig. 3: i
Fig. 4: i
Fig. 5: i
Fig. 6: i

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AIP:

Abnormally invasive placenta

PAS:

Placenta accreta spectrum

PRBCs:

Packed red blood cells

RBCs:

Red blood cells

References

  1. Silver RM, Barbour KD (2015) Placenta accreta spectrum: accreta, increta, and percreta. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 42(2):381–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jauniaux E, Ayres-de-Campos D (2018) FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: introduction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 140(3):261–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alfirevic Z, Tang AW, Collins SL, Robson SC, Palacios-Jaraquemada J (2016) Pro forma for ultrasound reporting in suspected abnormally invasive placenta (AIP): an international consensus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 47(3):276–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins SL, Ashcroft A, Braun T, Calda P, Langhoff-Roos J, Morel O, Stefanovic V, Tutschek B, Chantraine F (2016) Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 47(3):271–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU (2005) Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(5):1458–1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jauniaux E, Collins SL, Jurkovic D, Burton GJ (2016) Accreta placentation: a systematic review of prenatal ultrasound imaging and grading of villous invasiveness. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215(6):712–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakhavar N, Heidari Z, Mahmoudzadeh-Sagheb H (2015) Cervical inversion as a novel technique for postpartum hemorrhage management during cesarean delivery for placenta previa accreta/increta. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 128(2):122–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.08.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hussein AM, Refaat Dakhly DM, Raslan AN, Kamel A, Hafeez AA, Moussa M, Hosny AS, Momtaz M (2018) The role of prophylactic internal iliac artery ligation in abnormally invasive placenta undergoing caesarean hysterectomy: a randomized control trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1463986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Benedetti-Panici P, Kohler C, Raspagliesi F, Querleu D, Morrow CP (2011) New classification system of radical hysterectomy: emphasis on a three-dimensional anatomic template for parametrial resection. Gynecol Oncol 122(2):264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Committee on Obstetric Practice (2012) Committee opinion no. 529: placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 120(1):207–211. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e318262e340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gielchinsky Y, Mankuta D, Rojansky N, Laufer N, Gielchinsky I, Ezra Y (2004) Perinatal outcome of pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 104(3):527–530. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000136084.92846.95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shih JC, Palacios Jaraquemada JM, Su YN, Shyu MK, Lin CH, Lin SY, Lee CN (2009) Role of three-dimensional power Doppler in the antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: comparison with gray-scale and color Doppler techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(2):193–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Asicioglu O, Sahbaz A, Gungorduk K, Yildirim G, Asicioglu BB, Ulker V (2014) Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with placenta praevia and accreta in teaching hospitals in Western Turkey. J Obstet Gynaecol 34(6):462–466. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2014.902040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamel A, El-Mazny A, Salah E, Ramadan W, Hussein AM, Hany A (2017) Manual removal versus spontaneous delivery of the placenta at cesarean section in developing countries: a randomized controlled trial and review of literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1369522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. (2015) Quantification of blood loss: AWHONN practice brief number 1. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 44(1):158–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/1552-6909.12519

  16. Warshak CR, Ramos GA, Eskander R, Benirschke K, Saenz CC, Kelly TF, Moore TR, Resnik R (2010) Effect of predelivery diagnosis in 99 consecutive cases of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 115(1):65–69. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c4f12a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Angstmann T, Gard G, Harrington T, Ward E, Thomson A, Giles W (2010) Surgical management of placenta accreta: a cohort series and suggested approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(1):38.e31–38.e39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark SL, Phelan JP, Yeh SY, Bruce SR, Paul RH (1985) Hypogastric artery ligation for obstetric hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 66(3):353–356

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Brien JM, Barton JR, Donaldson ES (1996) The management of placenta percreta: conservative and operative strategies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1632–1638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shamshirsaz AA, Fox KA, Salmanian B, Diaz-Arrastia CR, Lee W, Baker BW, Ballas J, Chen Q, Van Veen TR, Javadian P, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Zacharias N, Welty S, Cassady CI, Moaddab A, Popek EJ, Hui SK, Teruya J, Bandi V, Coburn M, Cunningham T, Martin SR, Belfort MA (2015) Maternal morbidity in patients with morbidly adherent placenta treated with and without a standardized multidisciplinary approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(2):218.e211–218.e219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Belfort MA, Shamshirsaz AA, Fox KA (2017) A technique to positively identify the vaginal fornices during complicated postpartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 217(2):222.e221–222.e223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Selman AE (2016) Caesarean hysterectomy for placenta praevia/accreta using an approach via the pouch of Douglas. BJOG 123(5):815–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rossetti D, Vitale SG, Bogani G, Rapisarda AM, Gulino FA, Frigerio L (2015) Usefulness of vessel-sealing devices for peripartum hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Updates Surg 67(3):301–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0289-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Washecka R, Behling A (2002) Urologic complications of placenta percreta invading the urinary bladder: a case report and review of the literature. Hawaii Med J 61(4):66–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Upson K, Silver RM, Greene R, Lutomski J, Holt VL (2014) Placenta accreta and maternal morbidity in the Republic of Ireland, 2005–2010. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 27(1):24–29. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.799654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brookfield KF, Goodnough LT, Lyell DJ, Butwick AJ (2014) Perioperative and transfusion outcomes in women undergoing cesarean hysterectomy for abnormal placentation. Transfusion 54(6):1530–1536. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.12483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weiniger CF, Kabiri D, Ginosar Y, Ezra Y, Shachar B, Lyell DJ (2016) Suspected placenta accreta and cesarean hysterectomy: observational cohort utilizing an intraoperative decision strategy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 198:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.12.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Eller AG, Porter TF, Soisson P, Silver RM (2009) Optimal management strategies for placenta accreta. BJOG 116(5):648–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02037.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Belfort MA (2010) Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(5):430–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mazouni C, Palacios-Jaraquemada JM, Deter R, Juhan V, Gamerre M, Bretelle F (2009) Differences in the management of suspected cases of placenta accreta in France and Argentina. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 107(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.04.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. El Behery MM, Rasha LE, El Alfy Y (2010) Cell-free placental mRNA in maternal plasma to predict placental invasion in patients with placenta accreta. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 109(1):30–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chantraine F, Blacher S, Berndt S, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Sarioglu N, Nisolle M, Braun T, Munaut C, Foidart JM (2012) Abnormal vascular architecture at the placental-maternal interface in placenta increta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(3):188.e181–188.e189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Hesham Torad M.D. (team’s on-call urologist), and Dr. Ahmed Hosny M.D. (team’s on-call vascular surgeon) for their hard work and continuous support throughout the duration of the study, and for their skills and dedication during the operative procedures when called upon.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or nonprofit sector.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AMH: Protocol/project development, obstetrics and gynecological surgery, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. AK: Protocol/project development, obstetrics and gynecological surgery, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. AR: Obstetrics and gynecological surgery, data collection or management, manuscript writing/editing. DMD: Obstetrics and gynecological surgery, data collection or management, manuscript writing/editing. AA: Obstetrics and gynecological surgery, data collection or management, manuscript writing/editing. MN: Obstetrics and gynecological surgery, data collection and management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. MM: Obstetrics and gynecological surgery, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Kamel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors of this study declare no conflict of interest and no competing interests with respect to the research, authorship and publication of this article.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 316 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (JPEG 212 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (JPEG 194 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (JPEG 211 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (JPEG 48 kb)

Supplementary material 6 (JPEG 246 kb)

Supplementary material 7 (JPEG 258 kb)

Supplementary material 8 (JPEG 176 kb)

Supplementary material 9 (JPEG 208 kb)

Supplementary material 10 (JPEG 369 kb)

Supplementary material 11 (JPEG 364 kb)

Supplementary material 12 (JPEG 90 kb)

Supplementary material 13 (JPEG 228 kb)

Supplementary material 14 (JPEG 199 kb)

Supplementary material 15 (JPEG 262 kb)

Supplementary material 16 (JPEG 79 kb)

Supplementary material 17 (JPEG 377 kb)

Supplementary material 18 (JPEG 293 kb)

Supplementary material 19 (JPEG 378 kb)

Supplementary material 20 (JPEG 264 kb)

Supplementary material 21 (JPEG 256 kb)

Supplementary material 22 (JPEG 256 kb)

Supplementary material 23 (JPEG 224 kb)

Supplementary material 24 (JPEG 246 kb)

Supplementary material 25 (JPEG 316 kb)

Supplementary material 26 (JPEG 233 kb)

Supplementary material 27 (JPEG 218 kb)

Supplementary material 28 (JPEG 305 kb)

Supplementary material 29 (JPEG 224 kb)

Supplementary material 30 (JPEG 251 kb)

Supplementary material 31 (JPEG 228 kb)

Supplementary material 32 (JPEG 217 kb)

Supplementary material 33 (JPEG 292 kb)

Supplementary material 34 (JPEG 242 kb)

Supplementary material 35 (JPEG 71 kb)

Supplementary material 36 (JPEG 213 kb)

Supplementary material 37 (JPEG 234 kb)

Supplementary material 38 (JPEG 344 kb)

Supplementary material 39 (JPEG 268 kb)

Supplementary material 40 (JPEG 310 kb)

Supplementary material 41 (JPEG 249 kb)

Supplementary material 42 (JPEG 301 kb)

Supplementary material 43 (JPEG 314 kb)

Supplementary material 44 (JPEG 235 kb)

Supplementary material 45 (JPEG 238 kb)

Supplementary material 46 (JPEG 323 kb)

Supplementary material 47 (JPEG 292 kb)

Supplementary material 48 (JPEG 290 kb)

Supplementary material 49 (JPEG 336 kb)

Supplementary material 50 (JPEG 254 kb)

Supplementary material 51 (JPEG 114 kb)

Supplementary material 52 (JPEG 241 kb)

Supplementary material 53 (JPEG 275 kb)

Supplementary material 54 (JPEG 281 kb)

Supplementary material 55 (JPEG 246 kb)

Supplementary material 56 (JPEG 329 kb)

Supplementary material 57 (JPEG 304 kb)

Supplementary material 58 (JPEG 431 kb)

Supplementary material 59 (JPEG 320 kb)

Supplementary material 60 (JPEG 282 kb)

Supplementary material 61 (JPEG 290 kb)

Supplementary material 62 (JPEG 387 kb)

Supplementary material 63 (JPEG 334 kb)

Video 1: Identification of the avascular plane in the posterior leaflet of the broad ligament (MOV 8039 kb)

Video 2: Dissecting the posterior leaflet of the broad ligament in the avascular plane (MOV 11376 kb)

Video 3: Identification of the ureter (MOV 3677 kb)

404_2018_5027_MOESM67_ESM.mov

Video 4: Demarcation of the level of placenta and clamping just below it. Videos 1 and 2 were filmed by A.K, videos 3 and 4 were filmed by M.N (MOV 8193 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussein, A.M., Kamel, A., Raslan, A. et al. Modified cesarean hysterectomy technique for management of cases of placenta increta and percreta at a tertiary referral hospital in Egypt. Arch Gynecol Obstet 299, 695–702 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-5027-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-5027-7

Keywords

Navigation