Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation during cesarean delivery

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shinar S, Blecher Y, Alpern S et al (2017) Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:1185–1189

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Danis RB, Della Badia CR, Richard SD (2016) Postpartum permanent sterilization: could bilateral salpingectomy replace bilateral tubal ligation? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:928–932

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ida T, Fujiwara H, Matsubara S, Taniguchi Y, Kohyama A (2017) Salpingectomy for tubal sterilization at cesarean section: no extra time and no extra bleeding compared with tubal ligation. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 44:879–881

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shinar S, Ashwal E, Blecher Y et al (2017) Bilateral salpingectomy vs tubal ligation for permanent sterilization during a cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216:S415–S416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganer Herman H, Gluck O, Keidar R et al (2017) Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 217(472):e1–e6

    Google Scholar 

  6. Powell CB, Alabaster A, Simmons S et al (2017) Salpingectomy for sterilization: change in practice in a large integrated health care system, 2011–2016. Obstet Gynecol 130:961–967

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia C, Moskowitz OM, Chisholm CA et al (2018) Salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 132:29–34

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Subramaniam A, Blanchard CT, Erickson BK et al (2018) Feasibility of complete salpingectomy compared with standard postpartum tubal ligation at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 132:20–27

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Parikh P, Kim S, Torbenson V et al (2018) Safety of salpingectomy at time of cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:S329–S330

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China

    Yongming Du

Authors
  1. Yongming Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YMD: manuscript writing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongming Du.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Yongming Du declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, Y. Salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation during cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 298, 1037–1038 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4907-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4907-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation