Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 298, Issue 1, pp 223–229 | Cite as

Can a quality-of-life assessment assist in identifying women at risk of prematurely discontinuing IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study utilizing the FertiQoL questionnaire

  • Kay Neumann
  • Janna Kayser
  • Marion Depenbusch
  • Askan Schultze-Mosgau
  • Georg Griesinger
Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine



This study aimed at assessing quality of life (QoL) by means of a validated measurement tool (FertiQoL) in German infertile patients before a first IVF/ICSI cycle with ancillary assessment of changes in FertiQoL scores after a failed first cycle and the predictive capacity of FertiQoL scores for treatment discontinuation.


The validated FertiQoL tool consisting of 24 questions regarding fertility-specific aspects of QoL was used for this prospective cohort study conducted at a university affiliated IVF center in Germany. Female patients (n = 119) filled out the FertiQoL form and questionnaire on sociodemographic variables on initiation of a first- and second-cycle IVF/ICSI treatment, respectively.


On initiation of a first IVF/ICSI cycle, the mean scores (± standard deviation) for subscales emotional, mind–body, relational, and social items were 62 (± 19), 75 (± 17), 82 (± 13), and 78 (± 14), respectively; the total FertiQoL score was 73 (± 12). The mean total FertiQoL score at initiation of a first treatment cycle did not differ between patients who continued vs. discontinued treatment in case of no pregnancy achievement in the first cycle (73) (± 10) vs. 74 (± 14), p = 0.46). Furthermore, the mean total FertiQoL score did not change after an unsuccessful first IVF cycle (74 vs. 76, p = 0.46).


There was no statistical difference in a small sample size for FertiQoL scores between all groups. In this study, FertiQoL scores were, therefore, not usable to predict withdrawal from infertility treatment.


IVF/ICSI Assisted reproductive techniques Quality of life FertiQoL 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

KN., M.D., A.SM., and J.K. have nothing to disclose; G.G. has received personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, Ferring, Merck-Serono, Finox, TEVA, IBSA, Glycotope, as well as personal fees from VitroLife, NMC Healthcare LLC, ReprodWissen LLC, and ZIVA LLC.

Research involving human and animal participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


  1. 1.
    World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (1995) (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organisation. Soc Sci Med 41:1403–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Verhaak CM, Smeenk JMJ, Evers AWM, Kremer JAM, Kraaimaat FW, Braat DDM (2007) Women’s emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Hum Reprod Update 13:27–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greil AL (1997) Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 45:1679–1704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boivin J, Schmidt L (2005) Infertility-related stress in men and women predicts treatment outcome one year later. Fertil Steril 83:1745–1752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drosdzol A, Skrzypulec V (2008) Quality of life and sexual functioning of Polish infertile couples. Eur J Contracept Reprod Care 13:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chachamovich J, Chachamovich E, Ezer H, Fleck M, Knauth D, Passos E (2010) Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 31:101–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A (2011) The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 26(8):2084–2091. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kitchen H, Aldhouse N, Trigg A, Palencia R, Mitchell S (2017) A review of patient-reported outcome measures to assess female infertility-related quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 15(1):86. (Review) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pinborg A, Hougaard CO, Nyboe Andersen A, Molbo D, Schmidt L (2009) Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1338 couples initiating infertility treatment. Hum Reprod 24(4):991–999. (Epub 2009 Jan 9) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brandes M, Hamilton CJ, de Bruin JP, Nelen WL, Kremer JA (2010) The relative contribution of IVF to the total ongoing pregnancy rate in a subfertile cohort. Hum Reprod 25(1):118–126. (Epub 2009 Oct 24) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Domar AD, Smith K, Conboy L, Iannone M, Alper M (2010) A prospective investigation into the reasons why insured United States patients drop out of in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 94(4):1457–1459CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huppelschoten AG, van Dongen AJ, Philipse IC, Hamilton CJ, Verhaak CM, Nelen WL, Kremer JA (2013) Predicting dropout in fertility care: a longitudinal study on patient-centredness. Hum Reprod 28(8):2177–2186. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gameiro S, Boivin J, Peronace L, Verhaak CM. Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(6):652–69.
  14. 14.
    Eisenberg ML, Smith JF, Millstein SG, Nachtigall RD, Adler NE, Pasch LA, Katz PP; Infertility Outcomes Program Project Group. Predictors of not pursuing infertility treatment after an infertility diagnosis: examination of a prospective U.S. cohort. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2369–71. Epub 2010 May 14
  15. 15.
    Olivius C, Friden B, Borg G, Bergh C (2004) Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? A cohort study. Fertil Steril 81(2):258–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cardiff University. Quality of Life tool scoring. Accessed 23 Mai 2017
  17. 17.
    Aarts JW, van Empel IW, Boivin J, Nelen WL, Kremer JA, Verhaak CM (2011) Relationship between quality of life and distress in infertility: a validation study of the Dutch FertiQoL. Hum Reprod 26(5):1112–1118. (Epub 2011 Mar 3 PubMed PMID: 21372046)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Penzias AS (2004) When and why does the dream die? Or does it? Fertil Steril 81(2):274–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Malchau SS, Henningsen AA, Loft A, Rasmussen S, Forman J, Nyboe Andersen A, Pinborg A (2017) The long-term prognosis for live birth in couples initiating fertility treatments. Hum Reprod 32(7):1439–1449. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jordan C, Revenson TA (1999) Gender differences in coping with infertility: a meta-analysis. J Behav Med 22(4):341–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pedro J, Sobral MP, Mesquita-Guimarães J, Leal C, Costa ME, Martins MV (2017) Couples’ discontinuation of fertility treatments: a longitudinal study on demographic, biomedical, and psychosocial risk factors. J Assist Reprod Genet 34(2):217–224. (Epub 2016 Nov 29) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kahyaoglu Sut H, Balkanli Kaplan P (2014) Quality of life in women with infertility via the FertiQoL and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales. Nurs Health Sci. (Epub ahead of print) PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive MedicineUniversity Hospital of Schleswig-HolsteinLuebeckGermany

Personalised recommendations