Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 298, Issue 1, pp 103–110 | Cite as

Analysis of factors affecting outcomes of pregnancy complicated by Echinococcus: an algorithm for approach and management

  • Sebahattin Celik
  • Ozan Okyay
  • Erbil Karaman
  • Özlem Z. Sert
  • Numan Cim
  • Tuba Y. Okyay
Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

The management of hydatid disease (HD) co-occurring with pregnancy remains a challenge for physicians. We aimed to determine factors that were related to fetal and maternal outcomes in HD complicated pregnancies and then develop an approach/treatment algorithm.

Method

All patients at the participating hospitals were first analyzed to determine whether they had HD. Only patients diagnosed with HD during the course of their pregnancy were included. Certain cyst-related factors (diameter, localization, increase in size, and viability) and certain pregnancy-related factors (treatments, gestational week, maternal co-morbidities, and delivery type) were investigated. Nonlinear principal component analysis (NPCA) was performed to determine the relationships between the categories of variables.

Results

Out of 12,926 pregnancies, 27 cases were diagnosed with HD. In 13 cases, each developed at least one fetal problem. Using Albendazol in first trimester, presence of an active cyst, increased diameter by more than 1 cm during pregnancy and a cyst diagnosed in the second trimester were associated with at least one fetal problem. According to the NPCA results, cyst diameter when first diagnosed was related to fetal outcomes; a cyst greater than 10 cm was associated with “at least one fetal problem”. Cysts 5–10 cm in diameter were in a neutral position, while 2–5 cm in diameter were in the “no problems” group.

Conclusions

HD mostly affects fetus. If cyst-related and pregnancy-related variables are optimal, close follow-up on a monthly is the best course of action. However, in high-risk conditions, percutaneous interventions or surgery should be considered.

Keywords

Echinococcus granulosus Pregnancy Treatment Fetal outcomes 

Notes

Authors’ contribution

SC: Protocol/project development, Data analysis, Manuscript writing/editing. OO Data collection or management, Data Analysis. EK Data collection or management, Manuscript writing/editing. NC Data collection or management, Project Development, Data Analysis. OZS Data collecting or management, Manuscript writing/editing. OT Data collecting or management, Data analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statements

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of Yuzuncu Yıl University Faculty of Medicine (date: 28 February 2017; reference: 08) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Lewis JW Jr, Koss N, Kerstein MD (1975) A review of echinococcal disease. Ann Surg 181:390–396CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tunger O (2013) Epidemiology of cystic echinococcosis in the world. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 37:47–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kain KC, Keystone JS (1988) Recurrent hydatid disease during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:1216–1217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Montes H, Soetkino R, Carr-Locke DL (2002) Hydatid disease in pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1553–1555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sahin E, Nayki U, Sadik S et al (2005) Abdominal and pelvic hydatid disease during pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273:58–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rodrigues G, Seetharam P (2008) Management of hydatid disease (echinococcosis) in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 63:116–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gharbi HA, Hassine W, Abdesselem K (1985) Ultrasonography in abdominal hydatid-disease—comments and specific aspects (Echinococcus granulosus). Ann Radiol 28:31–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manterola C, Espinoza R, Munoz S et al (2004) Abdominal echinococcosis during pregnancy: clinical aspects and management of a series of cases in Chile. Trop Doct 34:171–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vuitton DA (2009) Benzimidazoles for the treatment of cystic and alveolar echinococcosis: what is the consensus? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 7:145–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-On J (2003) Benzimidazole treatment of cystic echinococcosis. Acta Trop 85:243–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Bhattacharyya SK, Bhattacharya S, Alam H et al (2013) Dilemmas encountered while dealing a pregnancy complicated by pelvic hydatid disease. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288:965–966CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zeybek BEAM, Yeniel AÖ, Ulukuş M (2010) Hepatic hydatid disease during pregnancy. Ege J Med 49:197–199Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Larrieu EJ, Frider B (2001) Human cystic echinococcosis: contributions to the natural history of the disease. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 95:679–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Can D, Oztekin O, Oztekin O et al (2003) Hepatic and splenic hydatid cyst during pregnancy: a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 268:239–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Faculty of MedicineYuzuncu Yıl UniversityVanTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of MedicineYuzuncu Yıl UniversityVanTurkey
  3. 3.General Surgery ClinicErcis State HospitalVanTurkey

Personalised recommendations