Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethnic differences in maternal near miss

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the association between ethnic differences and the occurrence of maternal near miss (MNM) in the Amazon and Northeast regions of Brazil.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of a national cross-sectional study focused on the assessment of care to pregnancy, childbirth, and infants under 1 year of age. Ethnicity was classified as white, black or indigenous. Ethnic distribution by state and region, the proportion of severe maternal complications and related procedures, and the prevalence of MNM and its criteria were calculated for the ethnic groups. Risks for MNM were estimated per sociodemographic characteristics and healthcare received by ethnic group, using prevalence ratios adjusted by all predictors and by the sampling method.

Results

76% of the 16.783 women were black, 20% white and 3.5% indigenous. Around 36% reported any complication related to pregnancy and the most frequent were hemorrhage (27–31%), and infection (7.1–9.0%). The MNM ratio was higher among indigenous (53.1) and black (28.4) than in white women (25.7). For black women, the risks of MNM were lower for private prenatal care and hospital admission for conditions other than hypertension, while higher for cesarean section and peregrination. For indigenous, the risks of MNM were lower for private prenatal care, and higher for a longer time to reach the hospital. For white women, only the low number of prenatal visits increased the risk of MNM.

Conclusions

The occurrence of MNM was higher for indigenous and black than for white women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (1999) Reduction of maternal mortality: a joint WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank statement. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/9789241561952/en/. Accessed 15 Sept 2017

  2. Paxton A, Maine D, Freedman L, Fry D, Lobis S (2005) The evidence for emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 88(2):181–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tucker MJ, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM, Hsia J (2007) The black–white disparity in pregnancy-related mortality from 5 conditions: differences in prevalence and case-fatality rates. Am J Public Health 97(2):247–251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nair M, Kurinczuk JJ, Knight M (2014) Ethnic variations in severe maternal morbidity in the UK—a case–control study. PLoS One 9(4):e95086

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Martins AL (2006) Maternal mortality among black women in Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 22(11):2473–2479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brazilian Ministry of Health (2013) Assessment of prenatal care, care to childbirth and to infants below 1 year of age in the Legal Amazon and Northeast, Brazil, 2010, 1st edn. Department of Science and Technology, Brasilia, pp 1–136. http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/livro_avaliacao_da_atencao_ao_pre-natal_web.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2017

  7. Souza JP, Cecatti JG, Faundes A et al (2010) Maternal near miss and maternal death in the World Health Organization’s 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health. Bull World Health Organ 88:113–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cecatti JG, Souza RT, Pacagnella RC, Leal MC, Moura EC, Santos LM (2015) Maternal near miss among women using the public health system in the Amazon and Northeast regions of Brazil. Rev Panam Salud Pública 37(4–5):232–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zanardi DM, Moura EC, Santos LP, Leal MC, Cecatti JG (2016) The effect of maternal near miss on adverse infant nutritional outcomes. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 71(10):593–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Viellas EF, Domingues RM, Dias MA et al (2014) Prenatal care in Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública 30:S85–S100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografi a e Estatística—IBGE (2011) Demographic Census: 2010. Characteristics of population and households: results from the universe. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro. http://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/93/cd_2010_caracteristicas_populacao_domicilios.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2017

  12. Anderson I, Robson B, Connolly M et al (2016) Indigenous and tribal peoples’ health (The Lancet-Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population study. Lancet 388(10040):131–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Montenegro RA, Stephens C (2006) Indigenous health in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet 367(9525):1859–1869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oladapo OT, Adetoro OO, Ekele BA et al (2016) When getting there is not enough: a nationwide cross-sectional study of 998 maternal deaths and 1451 near-misses in public tertiary hospitals in a low-income country. BJOG 123(6):928–938

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown HL, Small M, Taylor YJ, Chireau M, Howard DL (2011) Near miss maternal mortality in a multiethnic population. Ann Epidemiol 21(2):73–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lima MR, Nunes ML, Klüppel BL, Medeiros SM, Sá LD (2016) Nurses’ performance on indigenous and African-Brazilian health care practices. Rev Bras Enferm 69(5):840–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (1999) State-specific maternal mortality among black and white women—United States, 1987–1996. MMWR 48(23):492–496

    Google Scholar 

  18. Souza JP, Cecatti JG, Parpinelli MA, Sousa MH, Lago TG, Pacagnella RC, Camargo RS (2010) Maternal morbidity and near miss in the community: findings from the 2006 Brazilian demographic health survey. BJOG 117(13):1586–1592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cesar JA, Mano PS, Carlotto K, Gonzalez-Chica DA, Mendoza-Sassi RA (2011) Public versus private: assessing maternity care in the far South of Brazil. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant 11(3):257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pacagnella RC, Cecatti JG, Parpinelli MA et al (2014) Delays in receiving obstetric care and poor maternal outcomes: results from a national multicentre cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14(1):159

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Victora CG, Aquino EM, do Carmo Leal M, Monteiro CA, Barros FC, Szwarcwald CL (2011) Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges. Lancet 377(9780):1863–1876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Santos LM, Paes-Sousa R, Silva JB, Victora CG (2008) National Immunization Day: a strategy to monitor health and nutrition indicators. Bull World Health Organ 86(6):474–479

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tauil Mde C, Sato AP, Waldman EA (2016) Factors associated with incomplete or delayed vaccination across countries: a systematic review. Vaccine 34(24):2635–2643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our thanks to all people who participated in every phase of the study. The main study was financed by DECIT-MoH (the Department of Science and Technology from the Brazilian Ministry of Health). The current analysis was performed without any specific sponsorship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Protocol/project development: KGF, RTS, JGC. Data collection or management: MCL, ECM, LMS, JGC. Data analysis: ECM, KGF, JGC. Manuscript writing/editing: KGF, JGC, RTS. Commented, read and approved the final version: all the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose Guilherme Cecatti.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The main study was financed by DECIT-MoH (the Department of Science and Technology from the Brazilian Ministry of Health—no Grant number). The current analysis was performed without any specific sponsorship.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interests at all.

Ethical approval

The Neonatal Call study was assessed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Osvaldo Cruz Foundation (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil; FIOCRUZ, Letter of approval CEP/ENSP 56/10). Each woman signed an informed consent form after full explanation on the content of the study and before being enrolled. The study followed all ethical principles contained in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernandes, K.G., Souza, R.T., Leal, M.C. et al. Ethnic differences in maternal near miss. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296, 1063–1070 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4530-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4530-6

Keywords

Navigation