Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intrapartal pelvic floor protection: a pragmatic and interdisciplinary approach between obstetrics and urogynecology

  • News & Views
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pelvic floor protection is an issue of increasing relevance. This article sought to summarize the session at last year’s annual meeting of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) in Stuttgart (10/2016) called “Urogynecology 2020—what is the optimal rate of cesarean section—does urogynecology have to deal with Obstetrics?”. The main focus was set on the two important anatomical structures, the levator ani muscle and the anal sphincters. Operative vaginal delivery, epidural anesthesia, and episiotomy are subject to discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nygaard I et al (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300(11):1311–1316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. DeLancey JO et al (2003) The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 101(1):46–53

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. DeLancey JO et al (2007) Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 109(2 Pt 1):295–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lammers K et al (2012) Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: a systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect. Int Urogynecol J 23(12):1653–1664

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Morgan DM et al (2011) Vaginal support as determined by levator ani defect status 6 weeks after primary surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 114(2):141–144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tunn R (2002) Morphologie des Stressharninkontinenz-Kontrollsystems und seine pathomorphologischen Veränderungen bei Stressharninkontinenz. Habilitationsschrift, in Medizinische Fakultät Charité. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin

  7. Borello-France D et al (2006) Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstet Gynecol 108(4):863–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oberwalder M, Connor J, Wexner SD (2003) Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br J Surg 90(11):1333–1337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mous M, Muller SA, de Leeuw JW (2008) Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: faecal incontinence and sexual complaints. BJOG 115(2):234–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lenzen-Schulte M (2015) Zangen und andere Hilfsmittel: Eine Geburt ist nichts für grobe Handwerker. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (04.04.2015).

  11. Kearney R et al (2006) Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 107(1):144–149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Macarthur C et al (2005) Faecal incontinence and mode of first and subsequent delivery: a six-year longitudinal study. BJOG 112(8):1075–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Memon HU et al (2015) Comparison of levator ani muscle avulsion injury after forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted vaginal childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 125(5):1080–1087

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Michalec I et al (2015) Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery does not significantly contribute to the higher incidence of levator ani avulsion. Oftalmologicke Spolecnosti 80(1):37–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L (2011) Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):CD000331

    Google Scholar 

  16. Agrawal D et al (2014) The effect of epidural analgesia on labour, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome in nullipara of India, 2011–2014. J Clin Diagn Res 8(10):OC03–O6

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Low LK et al (2014) Predicting birth-related levator ani tear severity in primiparous women: evaluating maternal recovery from labor and delivery (EMRLD study). Open J Obstet Gynecol 4(6):266–278

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Jango H et al (2014) Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 59(1):e1–e6

    Google Scholar 

  19. DeLancey JO (2008) Episiotomy: what’s the angle? Int J Gynaecol Obstet 103(1):3–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bader W, Aigmueller T (2014) Leitlinie zum Management von Dammrissen III. und IV. Grades nach vaginaler Geburt. AWMF 015/079, pp 1–36

  21. Carroli G, Mignini L (2009) Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000081

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fodstad K, Staff AC, Laine K (2014) Effect of different episiotomy techniques on perineal pain and sexual activity 3 months after delivery. Int Urogynecol J 25(12):1629–1637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sultan AH, Editorial (1999) obstetrical perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk 5:193–196

    Google Scholar 

  24. Baghestan E et al (2012) Risk of recurrence and subsequent delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injuries. BJOG 119(1):62–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozyurt S et al (2015) Screening occult anal sphincter injuries in primigravid women after vaginal delivery with transperineal use of vaginal probe: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292(4):853–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson D et al (2014) UR-CHOICE: can we provide mothers-to-be with information about the risk of future pelvic floor dysfunction? Int Urogynecol J 25(11):1449–1452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

MH: project development, litsearch, and manuscript writing/editing. SYB: manuscript writing/editing. RT: manuscript writing/editing. GN: manuscript writing/editing. CR: manuscript writing/editing. HA: project development and manuscript writing/editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Huebner.

Ethics declarations

Funding

There is no funding.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huebner, M., Brucker, S.Y., Tunn, R. et al. Intrapartal pelvic floor protection: a pragmatic and interdisciplinary approach between obstetrics and urogynecology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295, 795–798 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4316-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4316-x

Keywords

Navigation