Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Repeat caesarean: time to re-evaluate the current practice

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Christmann-Schmid C, Raio L, Scheibner K, Müller M, Surbek D (2016) Back to “once a caesarean: always a caesarean“? Arch Gynecol Obstet, A trend analysis in Switzerland. doi:10.1007/S00404-016-4055-4

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leone T, Padmadas SS, Mathews Z (2008) Community factors affecting rising caesarean section rates in developing countries: an analysis of six countries. Soc Sci Med 67:1236–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization (1985) Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 2(8452):436–437

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BSA Medical College and Hospital, Rohini, Delhi, India

    Ritu Khatuja

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BJRM Hospital, Delhi, India

    Sumita Mehta

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCMS and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India

    Sneha Shree & Nidhi Arora

Authors
  1. Ritu Khatuja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sumita Mehta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sneha Shree
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nidhi Arora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nidhi Arora.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khatuja, R., Mehta, S., Shree, S. et al. Repeat caesarean: time to re-evaluate the current practice. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294, 1337–1338 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4207-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4207-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation