Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in the Taiwanese population: a retrospective observational study

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to explore the risk factors for ectopic pregnancy (EP) in the Taiwanese population and to identify any unknown risk factors for EP that could assist awareness and diagnosis.

Methods

This retrospective case–control study utilizes Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Analysis was conducted with a one million sample database representative of the country’s population. The case group comprised of 6637 individuals in the database that coded for EP using the ICD-9 classification system from January 2003 to December 2011. The control group comprised of 13,270 females matched by age that were never diagnosed with EP during the study period.

Results

This study provides an analysis of the risk factors of EP utilizing NHIRD. Among the 6637 people diagnosed with EP, logistic regression with age adjustment showed that the highest risk factor was endometriosis (OR = 8.84, CI 5.13–15.23), followed by polycystic ovary (OR = 7.74, CI 3.37–17.79) and benign neoplasm of the ovary (6.01, CI 2.18–16.54). All odds ratios were determined to be statistically significant at p < 0.001.

Conclusion

This study has identified the diagnosis of endometriosis and polycystic ovaries as the two largest risk factors for EP in Taiwan, and has also newly identified benign neoplasm of ovary and uterine leiomyoma as risk factors for EP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chang MC (2006) Taiwan’s transition from high fertility to lowest low levels. Asian J Health Inf Sci 1(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang CJ, Shyue SW (2009) A study on the application of data mining to disadvantaged social classes in Taiwan’s population census. Expert Syst Appl 36(1):510–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marion LL, Meeks GR (2012) Ectopic pregnancy: history, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55(2):376–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnhart KT (2009) Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med 361(4):379–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamwendo F et al (2000) Epidemiology of ectopic pregnancy during a 28 year period and the role of pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex Transm Infect 76(1):28–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Herlihy C (2011) Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 118(11):1403–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sindos M, Togia A, Sergentanis TN, Kabagiannis A, Malamas F, Farfaras A, Sergentanis IN, Bassiotou V, Antoniou S (2009) Ruptured ectopic pregnancy: risk factors for a life-threatening condition. Arch Gynecol Obstet 279(5):621–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bouyer J et al (2003) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 157(3):185–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rana P et al (2013) Ectopic pregnancy: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288(4):747–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saraiya M et al (1998) Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178(3):493–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parashi S, Moukhah S, Ashrafi M (2014) Main risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study in a sample of iranian women. Int J Fertil Steril 8(2):147

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ankum W et al (1996) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 65(6):1093–1099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shavell VI, Abdallah M, Zakaria MA, Berman JM, Diamond MP, Puscheck EE (2012) Misdiagnosis of cervical ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(2):423–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stulberg DB et al (2014) Ectopic pregnancy rates and racial disparities in the Medicaid population, 2004–2008. Fertil Steril 102(6):1671–1676

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Stulberg DB et al (2013) Ectopic pregnancy rates in the Medicaid population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208(4):274. e1–274. e7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsing AW, Ioannidis JP (2015) Nationwide population science: lessons from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. JAMA Internal Med 175(9):1527–1529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Karaer A, Avsar FA, Batioglu S (2006) Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 46(6):521–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Perkins KM et al (2015) Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001–2011. Obstet Gynecol 125(1):70–78

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Schippert C, Soergel P, Staboulidou I, Bassler C, Gagalick S, Hillemanns P, Buehler K, Garcia-Rocha GJ (2012) The risk of ectopic pregnancy following tubal reconstructive microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology procedures. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(3):863–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang J et al (2013) The association between polycystic ovary syndrome and ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209(2):139. e1–139. e9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wittich A (1998) Recurrent cornual ectopic pregnancy in a patient with leiomyomata uteri. J Am Osteopath Assoc 98(6):332–333

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsu MI et al (2012) Primary and repeated surgeries for ectopic pregnancies and distribution by patient age, surgeon age, and hospital levels: an 11-year nationwide population-based descriptive study in Taiwan. J Minim invasive Gynecol 19(5):598–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tuomivaara L, Kauppila A (1998) Ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study of aetiological risk factors. Arch Gynecol Obstet 243(1):5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Furlong L (2002) Pregnancy risk when contraception fails. J Reprod Med 47(11):881–885

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study based on data from the National Health Insurance Research Database provided by the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health and managed by National Health Research Institutes. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of National Health Insurance Administration, Department of Health or National Health Research Institutes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shabbir Syed-Abdul.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This type of study was not required the Institutional Review Board review in accordance with the policy of National Health Research Institutes which provides the large computerized de-identified data. http://nhird.nhri.org.tw/en/.

Financial support and funding

This research is sponsored in part by Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) under grant MOST 103-2221-E-038-014-, MOST 103-2221-E-038-016-, MOST 104-2221-E-038-013, MOST 104-3011-E-038 -001, Health and welfare surcharge of tobacco products grant MOHW104-TDU-B-212-124-001, Ministry of Education, Taiwan, under grant TMUTOP103006‐6.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

A. Hwang and L. Chou are contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, A., Chou, L., Islam, M.M. et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in the Taiwanese population: a retrospective observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294, 779–783 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4117-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4117-7

Keywords

Navigation