Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The association between fetal head position prior to vacuum extraction and pregnancy outcome

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To estimate the association of fetal head position prior to vacuum extraction (VE) and pregnancy outcome.

Study design

A retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies who underwent VE. Pregnancy outcome of occipito-anterior (OA) position of the fetal head was compared to those with occipito-posterior (OP) position.

Results

Amongst overall 12,063 women undergoing trial of labor, there were 1118 (9.2 %) VE deliveries. Of them, 871 (77.9 %) had OA and 247 (22.1 %) had OP position of the fetal head. Except for a higher rate of nulliparity in the OA group, no significant differences between the groups regarding pregnancy complications and birthweight were noted. In the OP group, there were higher rates of prolonged 2nd-stage of labor as an indication for VE (49.8 vs. 36.5 %, p < 0.001) and single detachment of vacuum cup (11.3 vs. 6.7 %, p = 0.02) without any increased risk of failed extraction. Higher risks for sub-galeal hematoma (aOR = 4.36, p = 0.03) and low 5-min Apgar score (aOR = 4.63, p = 0.02) were observed in the OP group with otherwise similar rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion

Among women undergoing VE, OP position is associated with higher rate of vacuum cup detachment, low 5-min Apgar score and increased risk for sub-galeal hematoma with otherwise similar rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2011) Green-top guideline no. 26. Operative vaginal delivery. RCOG, London

  2. Keriakos R, Sugumar S, Hilal N (2013) Instrumental vaginal delivery—back to basics. J Obstet Gynaecol 33:781–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R (2001) Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet 358:1203–1207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Haroush A, Melamed N, Kaplan B, Yogev Y (2007) Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:308.e1–e5

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Caughey AB (2006) Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: a retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19:563–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O’Herlihy C (2001) Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 98:1027–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carseldine WJ, Phipps H, Zawada SF, Campbell NT, Ludlow JP, Krishnan SY et al (2013) Does occiput posterior position in the second stage of labour increase the operative delivery rate? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 53:265–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ponkey SE, Cohen AP, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E (2003) Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 101:915–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Floberg J, Belfrage P, Ohlsen H (1987) Influence of the pelvic outlet capacity on fetal head presentation at delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 66:127–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sizer AR, Nirmal D (2000) Occipitoposterior position: associated factors and obstetric outcomes in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 96:749–752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Senécal J, Xiong X, Fraser WD, For the PEOPLE Study Group (2005) Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome. Obstet Gynecol 105:763–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirsch E, Elue R, Wagner A Jr, Nelson K, Silver RK, Zhou Y et al (2014) Severe perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery: the impact of occiput posterior position. J Perinatol 34:898–900

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pearl ML, Roberts JM, Laros RK, Hurd WW (1993) Vaginal delivery from the persistent occiput posterior position. Influence on maternal and neonatal morbidity. J Reprod Med 38:955–961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu JM, Williams KS, Hundley AF, Connolly A, Visco AG (2005) Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:525–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2000) Operative vaginal delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin 17. ACOG, Washington DC

  16. Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Barbera A et al (2014) Occiput posterior position diagnosis: vaginal examination or intrapartum sonography? A clinical review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 27:520–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Johanson R, Menon V (2000) Soft versus rigid vacuum extractor cups for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD000446

  18. Al-Kadri H, Sabr Y, Al-Saif S, Abulaimoun B, Ba’Aqeel H, Saleh A (2003) Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:642–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides KH (2003) Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chou MR, Kreiser D, Taslimi MM, Druzin ML, El-Sayed YY (2004) Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:521–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R (2003) Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. BJOG 110:610–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ali UA, Norwitz ER (2009) Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2:5–17

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chadwick LM, Pemberton PJ, Kurinczuk JJ (1996) Neonatal subgaleal haematoma: associated risk factors, complications and outcome. J Paediatr Child Health 32:228–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Govaert P, Vanhaesebrouck P, De Praeter C, Moens K, Leroy J (1992) Vacuum extraction, bone injury and neonatal subgaleal bleeding. Eur J Pediatr 151:532–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Uchil D, Arulkumaran S (2003) Neonatal subgaleal hemorrhage and its relationship to delivery by vacuum extraction. Obstet Gynecol Surv 58:687–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Doumouchtsis SK, Arulkumaran S (2006) Head injuries after instrumental vaginal deliveries. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18:129–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Teng FY, Sayre JW (1997) Vacuum extraction: does duration predict scalp injury? Obstet Gynecol 89:281–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Groutz A, Hasson J, Wengier A et al (2011) Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears: prevalence and risk factors in the third millennium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sheiner E, Levy A, Walfisch A, Hallak M, Mazor M (2005) Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed. Arch Gynecol Obstet 271:307–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Melamed N, Gavish O, Eisner M, Wiznitzer A, Wasserberg N, Yogev Y (2013) Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears—incidence and risk factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 26:660–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. de Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HC (2001) Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG 108:383–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Williams A (2003) Third-degree perineal tears: risk factors and outcome after primary repair. J Obstet Gynaecol 23:611–614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jangö H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthøj S, Sakse A (2014) Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210:59.e1–e6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bharucha AE, Prichard D (2014) Mediolateral episiotomy significantly reduces the risk of obstetric-associated anal sphincter injury (OASIS) in women who deliver via vacuum extract. Evid Based Med 19:155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rognant S, Benoist G, Creveuil C, Dreyfus M (2012) Obstetrical situations with a high risk of anal sphincter laceration in vacuum-assisted deliveries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91:862–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wirapornsawan U, Suwanrath C, Pinjaroen S (2012) The effect of vacuum operator’s experience on Apgar scores. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:1413–1417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rabin Medical Center, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, 49100, Petach Tikva, Israel

    Eran Ashwal, Avital Wertheimer, Amir Aviram, Hudi Pauzner, Arnon Wiznitzer, Yariv Yogev & Liran Hiersch

  2. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Eran Ashwal, Avital Wertheimer, Amir Aviram, Hudi Pauzner, Arnon Wiznitzer, Yariv Yogev & Liran Hiersch

Authors
  1. Eran Ashwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Avital Wertheimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amir Aviram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hudi Pauzner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Arnon Wiznitzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yariv Yogev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Liran Hiersch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liran Hiersch.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashwal, E., Wertheimer, A., Aviram, A. et al. The association between fetal head position prior to vacuum extraction and pregnancy outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293, 567–573 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3884-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3884-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation