Skip to main content

Risk factors predicting an emergency cesarean delivery for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics volume 292, pages 531–536 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To investigate obstetrical risk factors predicting failure of vaginal delivery and an emergency cesarean section (CS) for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin. In addition, the study was aimed to define perinatal outcomes of the second twin.

Study design

A retrospective study was conducted, comparing all deliveries of twins in which CS was performed for the second twin to those in which both twins were delivered vaginally during the years 1988–2010. Women with multiple gestations in which a CS was performed for both twins were excluded from the study.

Results

During the study period, 1966 vaginal deliveries of the first twin were recorded; 192 involved emergency CS for the second twin. Risk factors for emergency CS of the second twin were preterm delivery, previous CS, placental abruption and breech presentation of the second twin. Perinatal outcomes did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion

Risk factors for emergency cesarean section of the second twin are preterm delivery, previous CS, placental abruption and breech presentation. Nevertheless, short-term perinatal outcomes are comparable to twins delivered vaginally.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Martin JA, Kung HC, Mathews TJ, Hoyert DL, Strobino DM, Guyer B, Sutton SR (2008) Annual summary of vital statistics: 2006. Pediatrics 121:788–801

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rao A, Shanthi S, Hassan S (2004) Obstetric complications of twin pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18(4):557

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee YM (2012) Delivery of twins. Semin Perinatol 36(3):195–200

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse D, Landon MB, Gilbert SA, Spong CY, Varner MW, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, O’Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Gabbe SG (2008) Cesarean delivery for the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 112(4):748–752

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feldman DM, Borgida AF, Grabo H, Bobrowski RA, Ingardia CJ (2006) Trends in mode of delivery of twins from 1999 to 2004. Obstet Gynecol 107(4):66S–67S

  6. Lee HC, Gould JB, Boscardin WJ, El-Sayed YY, Blumenfeld YJ (2011) Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995 to 2008. Obstet Gynecol 118(5):1095–1101

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Breathnach FM, McAuliffe FM, Geary M, Daly S, Higgins JR, Dornan J, Morrison JJ, Burke G, Higgins S, Dicker P, Manning F, Carroll S, Mallone FD (2011) Prediction of safe and successful vaginal twin birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:237.e1–237.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams KP, Galerneau F (2003) Intrapartum influences on cesarean delivery in multiple gestation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:241–245

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sullivan CA, Harkins D, Seago DP, Roberts WE, Morrison JC (1998) Cesarean delivery for the second twin in the vertex–vertex presentation: operative indications and predictability. South Med J 91:155–158

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Constantine G, Redman CW (1987) Caesarean delivery of the second twin. Lancet 329(8533):618–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wen SW, Fung KF, Oppenheimer L, Demissie K, Yang Q, Walker M (2004) Occurrence and predictors of cesarean delivery for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin. Obstet Gynecol 103(3):413–419

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Olofsson P, Rydhstrom H (1985) Twin delivery: how should the second twin be delivered? Am J Obstet Gynecol 153:479–481

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki S (2009) Risk factors for emergency cesarean delivery of the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 35(3):467–471

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Varner MW, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Moawad AH, Hauth JC, Landon MB, Leveno KJ, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman A, O’Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM, Gabbe SG (2005) The maternal-fetal medicine unit cesarean registry: trial of labor with a twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:135–140

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Persad VL, Baskett TF, O’Connell CM, Scott HM (2001) Combined vaginal–cesarean delivery of twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 98:1032–1037

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ (2001) The continuing value of the apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. N Engl J Med 344:467–471

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Adam C, Allen AC, Baskett TF (1991) Twin delivery: influence of the presentation and method of delivery on the second twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:23–27

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rabinovici J, Barkai G, Reichman B, Serr DM, Mashiach S (1987) Randomized management of the second nonvertex twin: vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:52–56

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wen SW, Fung KFK, Oppenheimer L, Demissie K, Yang Q, Walker M (2004) Neonatal mortality in second twin according to cause of death, gestational age, and mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:778–783

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kontopoulos EV, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM (2004) The impact of route of delivery and presentation on twin neonatal and infant mortality: a population-based study in the USA, 1995–97. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 15(4):219–224

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Atis A, Aydin Y, Donmez M, Sermet H (2011) Apgar scores in assessing morbidity of the second neonate of cephalic/non-cephalic twins in different delivery modes. J Obstet Gynaecol 31(1):43–47

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ananth CA, Joseph KS, Oyelese Y, Demissie K, Vintzileos AM (2005) Trends in preterm birth and perinatal mortality among singletons: United States, 1989 through 2000. Obstet Gynecol 105:1084–1091

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ginsberg NA, Levine EM (2005) Delivery of the second twin. Int J Obstet Gynecol 91:217–220

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

The Institutional Review Board in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki approved the study.

Author information

Author notes

    Affiliations

    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, POB 151, 84101, Beer-Sheva, Israel

      Efrat Spiegel, Roy Kessous & Eyal Sheiner

    2. Epidemiology and Health Services Evaluation, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel

      Ruslan Sergienko

    Authors
    1. Efrat Spiegel
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Roy Kessous
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Ruslan Sergienko
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Eyal Sheiner
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Efrat Spiegel.

    Additional information

    E. Spiegel and R. Kessous are equal contributors.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Spiegel, E., Kessous, R., Sergienko, R. et al. Risk factors predicting an emergency cesarean delivery for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292, 531–536 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3667-4

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3667-4

    Keywords

    • Cesarean Section
    • Second twin