Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of visual impairment on pregnancy outcomes

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether visually impaired women are at higher risk for adverse maternal and perinatal complications, with an emphasis on visual impairment due to autoimmune etiology.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study compared obstetric, delivery complications and perinatal outcomes of patients with and without a diagnosis of visual impairment in one or both eyes. Multivariable models were conducted to control for confounders.

Results

During the study period (1988–2012), 265,741 deliveries were included; of these 80 (0.03 %) occurred in visually impaired patients. These patients were significantly older than the comparison group, and had higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and severe preeclampsia. Visually impaired women had higher rates of delivery prior to 37 weeks gestation and significantly higher rate of delivery by cesarean section (CS). A multivariable analysis model demonstrated that the risk factor for CS and packed cell transfusion in visually impaired women remained significantly high even after controlling for confounders such as maternal age, ethnicity, etc. (weighted OR = 2.04; 95 % CI 1.23–3.37; p = 0.006). However, visual impairment was not an independent risk factor for congenital malformations, using another multivariable model (weighted OR = 1.96; 95 % CI 0.99–3.85; p = 0.051). Perinatal outcome was comparable between the groups. The sub-group of visually impaired women due to possible autoimmune etiology was 19.4 % and they had higher rates of recurrent miscarriages and CS compared to the other sub-groups.

Conclusion

Visually impaired pregnant women are at high risk for CS and packed cell transfusion. Nevertheless, perinatal outcome is comparable to the general population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Resnikoff S, Keys TU (2012) Future trends in global blindness. Indian J Ophthalmol 60(5):387–395

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization (2009) Visual impairment and blindness fact sheet 282. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/…,2009

  3. World Health Organization, ICD-10, H53-H54 (2010). http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010/en

  4. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP (2012) Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 96:614–618. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmology-2011-300539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Skaat A, Chetrit A, Belkin M, Kinori M, Kalter-Leibovici O (2012) Time trends in the incidence and causes of blindness in Israel. Am J Ophthalmol 153(2):193–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ministry of Social Affairs and Social Services (2011) http://www.molsa.gov.il/Populations/Disabilities/Blindness/Blind Certificate/Pages/MT-05-04-01.aspx

  7. Gleicher N, Weiner R, Vietzke M (2006) The impact of abnormal autoimmune function on reproduction: maternal and fetal consequences. J Autoimmun 27:161–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tincani A, Rebaioli CB, Frassi M (2005) Pregnancy and autoimmunity: maternal treatment and maternal disease influence on pregnancy outcome. Autoimmun Rev 4:423–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaprara A, Krassas GE (2008) Thyroid autoimmunity and miscarriage. Hormones (Athens) 7(4):294–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan D (1986) Fetal wastage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 13:875–877

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ben-David G, Sheiner E, Hallak M (2008) Pregnancy outcome in women with psoriasis. J Reprod Med 53:183–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barnabe C, Faris PD, Quan H (2011) Canadian pregnancy outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Rheumatol 2011:345727

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clowse MEB, Jamison M, Myers E, James AH (2008) A national study of the complications of lupus in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(2):127.e1–127.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chakravarty EF, Nelson L, Krishnan E (2006) Obstetric hospitalizations in the United States for women with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 54(3):899–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reed SD, Vollan TA, Svec MA (2006) Pregnancy outcomes in women with rheumatoid arthritis in Washington State. Matern Child Hlth J 10(4):361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin HC, Chen SF, Lin HC, Chen YH (2010) Increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide population-based study. Ann Rheum Dis 69(4):715–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morton C, Le JT, Shahbandar L, Hammond C, Murphy EA, Kirschner KL (2013) Pregnancy outcomes of women with physical disabilities: a matched cohort study. PM&R 5(2):90–98. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Signore C, Spong CY, Krotoski D, Shinowara NL, Blackwell SC (2011) Pregnancy in women with physical disabilities. Obstet Gynecol 117(4):935–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exists in the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle Ofir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ofir, D., Kessous, R., Belfer, N. et al. The influence of visual impairment on pregnancy outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291, 519–523 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3412-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3412-4

Keywords

Navigation