Abstract
Purpose
To investigate whether visually impaired women are at higher risk for adverse maternal and perinatal complications, with an emphasis on visual impairment due to autoimmune etiology.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study compared obstetric, delivery complications and perinatal outcomes of patients with and without a diagnosis of visual impairment in one or both eyes. Multivariable models were conducted to control for confounders.
Results
During the study period (1988–2012), 265,741 deliveries were included; of these 80 (0.03 %) occurred in visually impaired patients. These patients were significantly older than the comparison group, and had higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and severe preeclampsia. Visually impaired women had higher rates of delivery prior to 37 weeks gestation and significantly higher rate of delivery by cesarean section (CS). A multivariable analysis model demonstrated that the risk factor for CS and packed cell transfusion in visually impaired women remained significantly high even after controlling for confounders such as maternal age, ethnicity, etc. (weighted OR = 2.04; 95 % CI 1.23–3.37; p = 0.006). However, visual impairment was not an independent risk factor for congenital malformations, using another multivariable model (weighted OR = 1.96; 95 % CI 0.99–3.85; p = 0.051). Perinatal outcome was comparable between the groups. The sub-group of visually impaired women due to possible autoimmune etiology was 19.4 % and they had higher rates of recurrent miscarriages and CS compared to the other sub-groups.
Conclusion
Visually impaired pregnant women are at high risk for CS and packed cell transfusion. Nevertheless, perinatal outcome is comparable to the general population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Resnikoff S, Keys TU (2012) Future trends in global blindness. Indian J Ophthalmol 60(5):387–395
World Health Organization (2009) Visual impairment and blindness fact sheet 282. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/…,2009
World Health Organization, ICD-10, H53-H54 (2010). http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010/en
Pascolini D, Mariotti SP (2012) Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 96:614–618. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmology-2011-300539
Skaat A, Chetrit A, Belkin M, Kinori M, Kalter-Leibovici O (2012) Time trends in the incidence and causes of blindness in Israel. Am J Ophthalmol 153(2):193–195
Ministry of Social Affairs and Social Services (2011) http://www.molsa.gov.il/Populations/Disabilities/Blindness/Blind Certificate/Pages/MT-05-04-01.aspx
Gleicher N, Weiner R, Vietzke M (2006) The impact of abnormal autoimmune function on reproduction: maternal and fetal consequences. J Autoimmun 27:161–165
Tincani A, Rebaioli CB, Frassi M (2005) Pregnancy and autoimmunity: maternal treatment and maternal disease influence on pregnancy outcome. Autoimmun Rev 4:423–428
Kaprara A, Krassas GE (2008) Thyroid autoimmunity and miscarriage. Hormones (Athens) 7(4):294–302
Kaplan D (1986) Fetal wastage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 13:875–877
Ben-David G, Sheiner E, Hallak M (2008) Pregnancy outcome in women with psoriasis. J Reprod Med 53:183–187
Barnabe C, Faris PD, Quan H (2011) Canadian pregnancy outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Rheumatol 2011:345727
Clowse MEB, Jamison M, Myers E, James AH (2008) A national study of the complications of lupus in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(2):127.e1–127.e6
Chakravarty EF, Nelson L, Krishnan E (2006) Obstetric hospitalizations in the United States for women with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 54(3):899–907
Reed SD, Vollan TA, Svec MA (2006) Pregnancy outcomes in women with rheumatoid arthritis in Washington State. Matern Child Hlth J 10(4):361–366
Lin HC, Chen SF, Lin HC, Chen YH (2010) Increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide population-based study. Ann Rheum Dis 69(4):715–717
Morton C, Le JT, Shahbandar L, Hammond C, Murphy EA, Kirschner KL (2013) Pregnancy outcomes of women with physical disabilities: a matched cohort study. PM&R 5(2):90–98. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.10.011
Signore C, Spong CY, Krotoski D, Shinowara NL, Blackwell SC (2011) Pregnancy in women with physical disabilities. Obstet Gynecol 117(4):935–947
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exists in the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ofir, D., Kessous, R., Belfer, N. et al. The influence of visual impairment on pregnancy outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291, 519–523 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3412-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3412-4