Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 289, Issue 2, pp 429–432 | Cite as

A comparison of pregnancy rate before and after the administration of HCG in intrauterine insemination

  • Razieh Dehghani-Firouzabai
  • Abbas Aflatoonian
  • Robab Davar
  • Maryam Farid-MojtahediEmail author
Reproductive Medicine



Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is one of the first treatments of infertility. In natural cycles, women conceive when an intercourse takes place during a 6-day period ending on the day of ovulation. The current practice in IUI cycles is to perform IUI 24–36 h after the HCG administration, when the ovulation already took place. In this study, HCG was administered after IUI, which more closely resembles the fertilization process in natural cycles. The aim of the present study is to compare the fertility rates in an IUI protocol in women who took an HCG injection before and after the IUI.


This study was conducted on 100 infertile couples who referred to the infertility research center of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. They were divided into two groups: HCG injection before IUI and HCG injection after IUI. The main outcome measure was the result of a β HCG test that was done two weeks after the IUI; if it was positive, transvaginal sonography would be performed in the seventh week for clinical confirmation of pregnancy.


The analysis included 50 cycles with HCG administered before and 50 cycles with HCG administered after the IUI. The pregnancy rates were 10 and 12 % (P = 0.85), respectively. Independent factor affected the cycle outcome was the time of infertility.


HCG administration after IUI brought about no improvement in the pregnancy rate. Therefore, HCG can be administered either before or after IUI.


HCG IUI Pregnancy rate Infertility 



The authors would like to thank In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) group of Yazd Research and Clinical Center for Infertility.

Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Hughes EG (1997) The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 12(9):1865–1872PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guzick DS, Carson SA, Coutifaris C, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Steinkampf MP et al (1999) Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. N Engl J Med 340(3):177–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tuomivaara L, Juntunen K, Tomas C, Martikainen H (1997) Long gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist/human menopausal gonadotrophin protocol for ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 74(1):83–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verhulst SM, Cohlen BJ, Hughes E, Te Velde E, Heineman MJ (2006) Intra-uterine insemination for \unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (2009) Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod Update 15(3):265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD (1995) Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med 333(23):1517–1521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steures P, van der Steeg JW, Hompes PG, Habbema JD, Eijkemans MJ, Broekmans FJ et al (2006) Intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus expectant management for couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet 368(9531):216–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dain L, Auslander R, Dirnfeld M (2011) The effect of paternal age on assisted reproduction outcome. Fertil Steril 95(1):1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2011) Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: an American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 97(4):825–834Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Verhoeve HR et al (2007) In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med 357(1):9–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu J, Nagy Z, Joris H, Tournaye H, Smitz J, Camus M et al (1995) Analysis of 76 total fertilization failure cycles out of 2,732 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Hum Reprod 10(10):2630–2636PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Swain JE, Pool TB (2008) ART failure: oocyte contributions to unsuccessful fertilization. Hum Reprod Update 14(5):431–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guttmacher AF (1956) Factors affecting normal expectancy of conception. J Am Med Assoc 161(9):855–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bensdorp AJ, Cohlen BJ, Heineman MJ, Vandekerckhove P (2007) Intra-uterine insemination for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD000360PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Razieh Dehghani-Firouzabai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Abbas Aflatoonian
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robab Davar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maryam Farid-Mojtahedi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Research and Clinical Center for InfertilityShahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesYazdIran
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyShahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesYazdIran

Personalised recommendations