References
Hata K, Hata T, Maruyama R, Hirai M (1997) Uterine sarcoma: can it be differentiated from uterine leiomyoma with Doppler ultrasonography? A preliminary study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9:101–104
Exacoustos C, Romanini ME, Amadio A, Amoroso C, Szabolcs B, Zupi E, Arduini D (2007) Can gray-scale and color Doppler sonography differentiate between uterine leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoma? J Clin Ultrasound 35:449–457
Ami O, Lamazou F, Mabille M, Levaillant JM, Deffieux X, Frydman R (2009) Real-time transvaginal elastosonography of uterine fibroids. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:486–488
Hobson MA, Kiss MZ, Varghese T, Sommer AM, Kliewer MA, Zagzebski JA, Hall TJ, Harter J, Hartenbach EM, Madsen EL (2007) In vitro uterine strain imaging. Preliminary results. J Ultrasound Med 26:899–908
Tessarolo M, Bonino L, Camanni M, Deltetto F (2011) Elastography: a possible new tool for diagnosis of adenomyosis? Eur Radiol 21:1546–1552
Thomas A, Kümmel S, Gemeinhardt O, Fischer T (2007) Real-time sonoelastography of the cervix: tissue elasticity of the normal and abnormal cervix. Acad Radiol 14:193–200
Sun LT, Ning CP, Liu YJ, Wang ZZ, Wang LD, Kong XC, Tian JW (2012) Is transvaginal elastography useful in pre-operative diagnosis of cervical cancer? Eur J Radiol 81:e888–e892
Xie M, Zhang X, Zhan J, Hua K (2013) Application of real-time ultrasound elastography for discrimination of low- and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med 32:257–262
Acknowledgments
The work reported in this paper was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Constructive Developmental Science” (No. 24119004), and Research Grant (No. 25462561) from The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nitta, E., Kanenishi, K., Itabashi, N. et al. Real-time tissue elastography of uterine sarcoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289, 463–465 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2974-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2974-x