Skip to main content
Log in

The prevalence of non-detectable chromosomal abnormalities by QF-PCR in amniocentesis for certain referral indications: experience at a mainland Chinese hospital

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study the prevalence of non-detectable chromosomal abnormalities by quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) in a Chinese population referred for amniocentesis.

Methods

The karyotype results were reviewed in 8,466 amniotic fluid cultures performed for positive fetal Down syndrome screening or advanced maternal age between January 2002 and June 2012. The karyotype results were classified as detectable or not detectable by QF-PCR, using the assumption that all tests were conducted by this rapid molecular method.

Results

Of the 8,466 karyotypes obtained, 211 abnormal karyotypes were found (2.5 %). Out of these, 168 cases of common aneuploidies were identified by QF-PCR, and 43 cases of chromosomal abnormalities were missed. The 43 cases missed by QF-PCR included 31 cases predicted to confer no increased risk and 12 with a potential clinical significance. When QF-PCR shows a normal result, the overall residual risk is 0.1 % for any clinically significant chromosomal abnormality.

Conclusions

A normal QF-PCR result predicts a very low residual risk for patients who are referred solely for an increased risk of a common trisomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mann K, Ogilvie CM (2012) QF-PCR: application, overview and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 32:309–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Langlois S, Duncan A (2011) Use of a DNA method, QF-PCR, in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 33:955–960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Faas BH, Cirigliano V, Bui TH (2011) Rapid methods for targeted prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 16:81–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaffer LG, Bui TH (2007) Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 145C:87–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicolini U, Lalatta F, Natacci F, Curcio C, Bui TH (2004) The introduction of QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: time for reconsideration. Hum Reprod Update 10:541–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leung WC, Lau ET, Lao TT, Tang MH (2003) Can amnio-polymerase chain reaction alone replace conventional cytogenetic study for women with positive biochemical screening for fetal Down syndrome? Obstet Gynecol 101:856–861

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Speevak MD, McGowan-Jordan J, Chun K (2011) The detection of chromosome anomalies by QF-PCR and residual risks as compared to G-banded analysis. Prenat Diagn 31:454–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Comas C, Echevarria M, Carrera M, Serra B (2010) Rapid aneuploidy testing versus traditional karyotyping in amniocentesis for certain referral indications. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 23:949–955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caine A, Maltby AE, Parkin CA et al (2005) Prenatal detection of Down’s syndrome by rapid aneuploidy testing for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 by FISH or PCR without a full karyotype: a cytogenetic risk assessment. Lancet 366:123–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gekas J, van den Berg DG, Durand A et al (2011) Rapid testing versus karyotyping in Down’s syndrome screening: cost-effectiveness and detection of clinically significant chromosome abnormalities. Eur J Hum Genet 19:3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ogilvie CM, Lashwood A, Chitty L, Waters JJ, Scriven PN, Flinter F (2005) The future of prenatal diagnosis: rapid testing or full karyotype? An audit of chromosome abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes for women referred for Down’s syndrome testing. BJOG 112:1369–1375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hills A, Donaghue C, Waters J et al (2010) QF-PCR as a stand-alone test for prenatal samples: the first 2 years’ experience in the London region. Prenat Diagn 30:509–517

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Papoulidis I, Siomou E, Sotiriadis A et al (2012) Dual testing with QF-PCR and karyotype analysis for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Evaluation of 13,500 cases with consideration of using QF-PCR as a stand-alone test according to referral indications. Prenat Diagn 32:680–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ried T, Landes G, Dackowski W, Klinger K, Ward DC (1992) Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization for the simultaneous detection of probe sets for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y in uncultured amniotic fluid cells. Hum Mol Genet 1:307–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leung WC, Lam YH, Wong Y, Lau ET, Tang MHY (2002) The effect of fast reporting by amnio-PCR on anxiety levels in women with positive biochemical screening for Down syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Prenat Diagn 22:256–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leung WC, Lau ET, Ngai C et al (2008) A prospective study on the effect of rapid aneuploidy testing (amnio-PCR) on anxiety levels and quality of life measures in women and their partners with positive Down screening result. Fetal Diagn Ther 24:165–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lam YH, Tang MH, Sin SY, Ghosh A (1998) Clinical significance of amniotic-fluid-cell culture failure. Prenat Diagn 18:343–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Zhi Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liao, C., Yi, CX., Li, FT. et al. The prevalence of non-detectable chromosomal abnormalities by QF-PCR in amniocentesis for certain referral indications: experience at a mainland Chinese hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289, 75–78 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2951-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2951-4

Keywords

Navigation