Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Systematic use of carbetocin during cesarean delivery of multiple pregnancies: a before-and-after study

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 May 2013

Abstract

Purpose

Cesarean deliveries of multiple pregnancies are associated with a high risk of hemorrhage. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of carbetocin administered systematically during cesarean deliveries of multiple pregnancies.

Methods

Single-center retrospective before-and-after study comparing the use of carbetocin to that of oxytocin during cesareans during two consecutive 6-month periods. A composite variable was predefined as the principal endpoint: any one or more of bleeding ≥1,500 mL, transfusion, hemoglobin reduction of 4 g/dL or more or operative intervention (surgery, embolization).

Results

In an intention-to-treat analysis, the comparison of the two groups (n = 24 before and n = 39 after) showed no difference for the occurrence of the composite variable (16.7 vs. 15.4 %, p = 0.89). Nor did the per-protocol analysis (n = 24 before and n = 27 after) differ for it (16.7 vs. 14.8 %, p = 0.86). Moreover, none of the secondary outcome measures studied—moderate blood loss, prescription of sulprostone, cell-saver use, and intravenous iron infusion—differed significantly between the two periods.

Conclusion

In our population of multiple pregnancies delivered by cesarean, carbetocin did not appear more effective than oxytocin in preventing severe postpartum hemorrhage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International joint policy statement (2004) FIGO/ICM global initiative to prevent postpartum hemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 26(12):1100–2,8–11

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goffinet F (2000) Hemorrhage during delivery. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 28(2):141–151

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert L, Porter W, Brown VA (1987) Postpartum haemorrhage: a continuing problem. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94(1):67–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Subtil D, Somme A, Ardiet E, Depret-Mosser S (2004) Postpartum hemorrhage: frequency, consequences in terms of health status, and risk factors before delivery. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 33(8):4S9–4S16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouvier-Colle MH, Saucedo M, Deneux-Tharaux C (2011) The confidential enquiries into maternal deaths, 1996–2006 in France: what consequences for the obstetrical care? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 40:87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CNGOF (2004) Post-partum hemorrhage. Guidelines (short text). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 33(Suppl. no 8):4S130–4S136

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rath W (2009) Prevention of postpartum haemorrhage with the oxytocin analogue carbetocin. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 147(1):15–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wedisinghe L, Macleod M, Murphy DJ (2008) Use of ocytocin to prevent haemorrhage at caesarean section-a survey of practice in the United Kingdom. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Boil 137:27–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Engstrom T, Barth T, Melin P, Vilhardt H (1998) Oxytocin receptor binding and uterotonic activity of carbetocin and its metabolites following enzymatic degradation. Eur J Pharmacol 355(2–3):203–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Su LL, Chong YS, Samuel M (2007) Oxytocin agonists for preventing postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(3):CD005457

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reyal F, Deffarges J, Luton D, Blot P, Oury J-F, Sibony O (2002) Severe post-partum hemorrhage: descriptive study at the Robert-Debré Hospital maternity ward. J Gynécol Obstet Bio Reprod 31(4):358–364

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C (2001) Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. BMJ 322:1089–1094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boucher M, Horbay GLA, Griffin P et al (1998) Double-blind, randomized comparison of the effect of carbetocin and oxytocin on intraoperative blood loss and uterine tone of patients undergoing cesarean section. J Perinatol 18:202–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dansereau J, Joshi AK, Helewa ME et al (1999) Double-blind comparison of carbetocin versus oxytocin in prevention of uterine atony after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:670–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Attilakos G, Psaroudakis D, Ash J et al (2010) Carbetocin versus oxytocin for theprevention of postpartum haemorrhage following caesarean section: the results of a double-blind randomised trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 117:929–936

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Borruto F, Treisser A, Comparetto C (2009) Utilization of carbetocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280:707–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Triopon G, Goron A, Agenor J et al (2010) Use of carbetocin in prevention of uterine atony during cesarean section. Comparison with oxytocin. Gynécol Obstet Fertil 38:729–734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

D. Subtil is a member of the board of directors of the FERRING® laboratory, which markets carbetocin in France (PABAL®).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demetz Julie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Julie, D., Elodie, C., Anne, D. et al. Systematic use of carbetocin during cesarean delivery of multiple pregnancies: a before-and-after study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287, 875–880 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2646-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2646-2

Keywords

Navigation