Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter–intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the outcome of induced labor at term using sequential intracervical Foley catheter with intravaginal misoprostol versus intravaginal misoprostol alone.

Methods

A prospective matched case control study among parturient with prolonged pregnancy and unfavorable cervix at a tertiary hospital in Nigeria.

Results

The study population was 100 with a mean age of 29.46 ± 3.88 years. Parturient with prior cervical priming using intracervical Foley catheter had significantly lower oxytocin augmentation of uterine contractions in labor (44 vs. 64%, P = 0.045), shorter mean insertion to active phase labor duration (233 ± 98 vs. 354 ± 154 min, P = 0.0001), shorter insertion to delivery interval (514 ± 175 vs. 627 ± 268, P = 0.014), more vaginal delivery <12 h (92.5 vs. 60%, P = 0.001) and less delivery by caesarean section (20 vs. 40%, P = 0.029).

Conclusions

The sequential combination of intracervical Foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor appears to be a safe and more effective method compared to intravaginal misoprostol in parturient at term with unfavorable cervices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crane JM, Butler B, Young DC, Hannah ME (2006) Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 113(12):1366–1376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Owolabi AT, Kuti O, Ogunlola IO (2005) Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol 25(6):565–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. MacKenzie IZ, Burns E (1997) Randomised trial of one versus two doses of prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour: 1. Clinical outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(9):1062–1067

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Helen HY, Leaseburge L, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM (2001) A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(4):911–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Induction of labour. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2008 July, 32 p (Clinical guideline; no. 70)

  6. Delaney S, Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas J, Sparks TN, Paul K, Caughey AB (2010) Labor induction with a Foley balloon inflated to 30 mL compared with 60 mL: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 115(6):1239–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdellah MS, Hussien M, Aboalhassan A (2010) Intravaginal administration of isosorbide mononitrate and misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. doi:10.1007/s00404-010-1572-4

  8. Chung JH, Huang WH, Rumney PJ, Garite TJ, Nageotte MP (2003) A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-foley catheter for labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(4):1031–1035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kashanian M, Akbarian AR, Fekrat M (2006) Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and foley catheter cervical traction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 92(1):79–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crane JM, Butler B, Young DC, Hannah ME (2006) Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 113(12):1366–1376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aziken M, Omo-Aghoja L, Okonofua F (2007) Perceptions and attitudes of pregnant women towards caesarean section in urban Nigeria. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86(1):42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abramovici D, Goldwasser S, Mabie BC, Mercer BM, Goldwasser R, Sibai BM (1999) A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term. Am J obstet Gynecol 181(5 Pt 1):1108–1112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sciscione AC, Nguyen L, Manley J, Pollock M, Maas B, Colmorgen G (2001) A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol 97(4):603–607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hill JB, Thigpen BD, Bofill JA, Magann E, Moore LE, Martin JN Jr (2009) A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Perinatol 26(1):33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Culver J, Strauss RA, Brody S, Dorman K, Timlin S, McMahon MJ (2004) A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women. Am J Perinatol 21(3):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article exists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria

    A. Babatunde Ande, C. Michael Ezeanochie & N. Biodun Olagbuji

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Health Sciences, University of Benin, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria

    A. Babatunde Ande

Authors
  1. A. Babatunde Ande
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Michael Ezeanochie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. Biodun Olagbuji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Babatunde Ande.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ande, A.B., Ezeanochie, C.M. & Olagbuji, N.B. Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter–intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285, 967–971 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2094-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2094-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation